# limiting searches

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [December 23, 2013, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050 "2013-12-23T23:26:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2013, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/1 "2013-12-23T23:26:20Z")

</div>

What is the reason that searches are limited on these boards so that you have to wait 120 seconds between them? Sometimes when I search I have a typo or realize my search wasn’t specific enough and get too many hits. Why must I then wait to try again?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![janeslogin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/df788c/32.png) [@janeslogin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/janeslogin)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/2 "2013-12-24T00:00:49Z")

</div>

I’ve a tendency to double click if the page is a bit slow loading and it is as annoying as all hell for about 119 seconds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/3 "2013-12-24T00:02:04Z")

</div>

Back in the old days, the hamsters running this place were too weak and feeble to manage something as big as a search without a good nap and a three-course meal between attempts. I suspect the current setup could probably survive without the limitation, but no one’s bothered to change it. I could be wrong. It also provides a brake on malicious people who could try to bring the place to a halt by running zillions of searches.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaffan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leaffan/32/299_2.png) [@Leaffan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaffan)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/4 "2013-12-24T00:34:58Z")

</div>

I search the SDMB using Google. Seems to be a much faster and accurate way of doing things.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/5 "2013-12-24T00:35:02Z")

</div>

Here’s a link to how to use Google to search SDMB much faster and with more specificity than the board’s own search engine can ever hope to do: [Google search of SDMB](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=638051)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EmilyG](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/emilyg/32/364_2.png) [@EmilyG](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EmilyG)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/6 "2013-12-24T00:40:44Z")

</div>

> [@Leaffan](#):
>
> I search the SDMB using Google. Seems to be a much faster and accurate way of doing things.

I did that once and discovered the Giraffe boards and what the people there thought of me…:dubious: 😉

> [@janeslogin](#):
>
> I’ve a tendency to double click if the page is a bit slow loading and it is as annoying as all hell for about 119 seconds.

Happens to me often too!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 12:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/7 "2013-12-24T00:43:33Z")

</div>

> [@Smeghead](#):
>
> Back in the old days, the hamsters running this place were too weak and feeble to manage something as big as a search without a good nap and a three-course meal between attempts. I suspect the current setup could probably survive without the limitation, but no one’s bothered to change it. I could be wrong. It also provides a brake on malicious people who could try to bring the place to a halt by running zillions of searches.

When I became a moderator about 10 years ago, I used to run IP searches on trolls. A search shut down the board for about 45 seconds at that time. Now, that doesn’t mean it would shut down the board for a poster doing a search, but I think that was indicative of how limited the board capability was at that point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siam\_Sam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d78d45/32.png) [@Siam\_Sam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Siam_Sam)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 2:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/8 "2013-12-24T02:47:45Z")

</div>

Popping in with the obligatory reminder that waiting time between searches used to be five minutes until a few years ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 4:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/9 "2013-12-24T04:34:03Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](#):
>
> Here’s a link to how to use Google to search SDMB much faster and with more specificity than the board’s own search engine can ever hope to do: [Google search of SDMB](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=638051)

Since the topic has come up again, could someone repost the great SD/Google hacks that two smart Dopers came up with?

Then I could use it to find the hacks if I had a time machine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2013, 6:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/10 "2013-12-24T06:24:44Z")

</div>

> [@Siam\_Sam](#):
>
> Popping in with the obligatory reminder that waiting time between searches used to be five minutes until a few years ago.

And we _liked it_!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [December 25, 2013, 11:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/11 "2013-12-25T23:07:06Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](#):
>
> Here’s a link to how to use Google to search SDMB much faster and with more specificity than the board’s own search engine can ever hope to do: [Google search of SDMB](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=638051)

The problem with Google is that it can’t search for posts by a particular user. Which is what most of my searches involve. Only the native search function knows how to do that. To Google, “posts by Cheshire Human” (using my name as an example) is meaningless. It _won’t_ give you useful results.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Digital\_is\_the\_new\_Analog](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a88e4f/32.png) [@Digital\_is\_the\_new\_Analog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Digital_is_the_new_Analog)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2013, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/12 "2013-12-26T02:23:30Z")

</div>

> [@Cheshire\_Human](#):
>
> The problem with Google is that it can’t search for posts by a particular user. Which is what most of my searches involve. Only the native search function knows how to do that. To Google, “posts by Cheshire Human” (using my name as an example) is meaningless. It _won’t_ give you useful results.

According to this thread of [Google search tricks](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11650034), you can do:

```auto

site:boards.straightdope.com "Find all posts by Cheshire Human"

```

I got [this](https://www.google.com/#q=site%3Aboards.straightdope.com+%22Find+all+posts+by+Cheshire+Human%22&safe=off)result, which seems to work. I didn’t click on all the links to verify, but the few I checked popped right to posted by you.  
Actually, I just found one where it gave me the post AFTER yours…so it seems like it’s close, but not quite accurate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2013, 3:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/13 "2013-12-26T15:09:56Z")

</div>

Cool! Thanks, I’ll try that next time and compare results to the native search function.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kayaker](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kayaker/32/441_2.png) [@kayaker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kayaker)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2013, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/14 "2013-12-26T19:48:09Z")

</div>

> [@Siam\_Sam](#):
>
> Popping in with the obligatory reminder that waiting time between searches used to be five minutes until a few years ago.

> [@Thudlow\_Boink](#):
>
> And we _liked it_!

Back in the day, searches involved climbing up and down rolling ladders, copious note taking, oil lamps, and penny candy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pork\_Rind](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pork_rind/32/111_2.png) [@Pork\_Rind](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pork_Rind)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2013, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/15 "2013-12-26T20:10:38Z")

</div>

> [@kayaker](#):
>
> Back in the day, searches involved climbing up and down rolling ladders, copious note taking, oil lamps, and penny candy.

Today, that same search still involves climbing up and down rolling ladders, copious note taking, and oil lamps. But the candy costs about $1.99 these days.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![spinky](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@spinky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/spinky)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2013, 10:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/16 "2013-12-26T22:46:24Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](#):
>
> Here’s a link to how to use Google to search SDMB much faster and with more specificity than the board’s own search engine can ever hope to do: [Google search of SDMB](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=638051)

Obligatory complaint that Google actually misses a lot of semantic information, as the text is all just words on a page to google. There is no way to find only posts/threads where a specific person said a specific thing, for example. The only reason google can even find posts from a specific person at all is a hack that relies on the fact that the string “find all posts by \<username\>” appears in the HTML at the top of each post. If I include the phrase “find all posts by Cecil Adams” in my post, then using the Google-fu others have come up with, this thread will come up in a search for posts by Cecil Adams. Note also that the google solution sucks if you have your “posts per page” set to a higher number than the default, because if google thinks a post is on anything but the first page of a thread, the link is going to be wrong (e.g. if google thinks a post is on page 10, it’s probably on page 4 for me).

Using google is hokey and shitty and makes me kind of embarrassed that the administration thinks it’s a substitute for a working search function. It has its benefits, but it’s not correct to act, as many do, like it’s got no drawbacks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiveCatUmbrellaNegroTeller](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/cab0a1/32.png) [@TubaDiveCatUmbrellaNegroTeller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiveCatUmbrellaNegroTeller)\
**Post date:** [December 27, 2013, 4:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/17 "2013-12-27T04:54:59Z")

</div>

It’s an engineering job. Outsource it to Marley. Or kick the brownie back to India.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2013, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/limiting-searches/677050/18 "2013-12-29T06:03:09Z")

</div>

Be grateful: the time limit used to be _5 minutes_.
