Limiting Sex Offender Registry to Rape and Child Molestation.

These.

One problem, however, is determining what convicts are significantly dangerous and which are not. One major problem is political - even if a politician wants to sponsor or sign a more sensible registry bill, they know that it’s not always perfect - and if their opponent can place the blame for releasing Johnny B. UsedToDiddleKids who went on to reoffend on the new policy, then bye bye career. There’s much more hell to pay for releasing one offender who goes on to reoffend than imprisoning or registering ten who wouldn’t have offended even if they had been released.

What criteria do you use for dangerousness? I know that there has been some statistical research - but do you then trust a number that’s based on only a dozen or so variables? “Oh yeah, #24601, your risk assessment comes out to 33%, you need a 30% or below to get off the registry, bummer, man! I know you took that class in ethics last spring, but they took that variable out the risk protocol as of last month. Sucks to be you!”