# little Dad time = gay son?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 5, 2006, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374 "2006-04-05T04:02:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arjuna34](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/eb8c5e/32.png) [@Arjuna34](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Arjuna34)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/1 "2006-04-05T04:02:20Z")

</div>

I’m in a debate with someone about the time a father spends with his son, and how it affects the odds of the son ending up gay. The claim is that if a father works too much (e.g. 55+ hrs per week), he can’t spend enough time with his son, and this lack of father time increases the odds of the son ending up gay. I’d like to refute that by debunking the source arguments, but unfortunately the source is “I read it somewhere …”, which is kind of hard to refute!

Does anyone know where this claim might be found?

Thanks,

Arjuna34

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scotandrsn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a4c791/32.png) [@scotandrsn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scotandrsn)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 4:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/2 "2006-04-05T04:32:40Z")

</div>

According to a “60 Minutes” segment from a couple of weeks ago, the strongest influence on homosexuality seems to be the number of older brothers a right-handed man has

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a9a28c/32.png) [@Blake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blake)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 4:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/3 "2006-04-05T04:38:25Z")

</div>

> [@scotandrsn](#):
>
> According to a “60 Minutes” segment from a couple of weeks ago, the strongest influence on homosexuality seems to be the number of older brothers a right-handed man has

Is the correlation supposed to be positive or negative?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bob55](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Bob55](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bob55)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/4 "2006-04-05T05:09:05Z")

</div>

Well according to [this site](http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/readings/homofinger/homo_finger.html)

> [@](#):
>
> The more older brothers a boy has, the more likely he is to develop a homosexual orientation

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bob55](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Bob55](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bob55)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 5:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/5 "2006-04-05T05:13:24Z")

</div>

Sorry forgot to add that they say they don’t think it’s necessarily older brother influence, but that because a mother has has several boys already, the younger boys are exposed to more androgen in the womb. And they state that homosexual men do have more androgen in their bodies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/6 "2006-04-05T05:14:08Z")

</div>

> [@Blake](#):
>
> Is the correlation supposed to be positive or negative?

The statement I have heard is that the odds of being gay increase by 1/3 for each older brother. I’ll try to find a cite.

The idea in the OP sounds pretty Freudian. I wonder what studies, if any, have been done on that topic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 5:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/7 "2006-04-05T05:19:19Z")

</div>

The previously mentioned theory is called the Fraternal Birth Order Effect. Blanchard and Bogaert did the relevant study in 1996.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 5:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/8 "2006-04-05T05:21:21Z")

</div>

I think you’re more likely to be gay if you’re born with a fabulousness gene, and if you have a lot of older STEPbrothers. But only if they’re hot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![levdrakon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/49beb7/32.png) [@levdrakon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/levdrakon)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 5:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/9 "2006-04-05T05:35:12Z")

</div>

There was the idea that the more older brothers you had, the greater your chances of being gay. More lately, the idea that the [sluttier](http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/mg18424690.800.html) your sisters are, the greater the odds you’re gay. It’s the “I really, really, REALLY like guys” gene.

So it’s women’s fault. Not Dad’s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![A.R.Cane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ee7513/32.png) [@A.R.Cane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/A.R.Cane)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 6:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/10 "2006-04-05T06:07:25Z")

</div>

The “maternal influence/paternal neglect” argument is just lame and has been  
discounted long ago. Anyone who presents this as a legitimate theory isn’t worth your  
time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chaoticbear](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f07891/32.png) [@chaoticbear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chaoticbear)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/11 "2006-04-05T14:30:53Z")

</div>

Wait until I tell my sister her eventual fate! (Her two older brothers are gay, although I don’t think that the younger will EVER come out of the closet.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mindfield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mindfield/32/19759_2.png) [@Mindfield](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mindfield)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/12 "2006-04-05T14:56:37Z")

</div>

The nature vs. nurture debate again? It seems like the OP assumes nature isn’t even involved – that the chances of becoming gay and the degree to which one does depends primarily on one’s environment, which I think is a steaming load. While the origins of homosexuality are far from being settled, there’s been strong evidence that genetics play a big part. The most significant debate right now is whether genetics alone are responsible or whether it is a combination of genetics, the chemical balance inside the womb, and possibly other contributing factors. None of these arguments leave much room for a “nurture” argument to be presented. Not that I’m an expert but I tend to agree: I don’t think nurture has anything to do with it, so any statistics that suggest the existence or degree of one’s “gayness” is proportional to the amount of time they spend with dear ol’ dad and/or the number of male siblings in the family are simply a reflection of the old “three types of lies” addage.

Furthermore, the whole “nurture” concept would mean that it is behavioral and thus can be “cured.” I think we’ve had ample evidence that this is completely bogus.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/13 "2006-04-05T15:00:49Z")

</div>

I have three sons, all solidly in the “hetero” column. I was in the military when they were growing up, and spent months at a time overseas. I know this is just a personal experience and not scientific, but there are many thousands of fathers who spend as much or more time away from their sons without having them all don Easter bonnets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/14 "2006-04-05T15:04:23Z")

</div>

> [@Chefguy](#):
>
> I have three sons, all solidly in the “hetero” column. I was in the military when they were growing up, and spent months at a time overseas. I know this is just a personal experience and not scientific, but there are many thousands of fathers who spend as much or more time away from their sons without having them all don Easter bonnets.

One would think that if this theory were true, much of the Western world would have been overrun by Judy Garland fans in the 50s, given that so many sons coming of age in that period had fathers who were away to fight the war - except in Ireland, Sweden and Spain, and other countries who sat it out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/15 "2006-04-05T15:07:26Z")

</div>

MY BROTHERS ARE GAY?

SHIT!

Ok, let’s not panic: nobody tell the sister in law, ok? Thanks.

Pst, **RickJay** , in the case of Spain lots of fathers had been in the war '36-'40 and lots of them were in exile or in hiding. But I really don’t think my dad and his elder brothers (eldest born in '32, 2nd in '34, Dad in '38) were gay. If Dad was gay he never figured it out 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/16 "2006-04-05T15:29:25Z")

</div>

Going back a half-century or so, the general belief was that homosexuality was due to a lack of a strong father figure while the boy was growing up. That’s probably where you friend is coming from.

The belief has been discredited for years – it does look like homosexuality is at least partially genetic – but some people probably were taught it as the cause and still believe it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/17 "2006-04-05T15:34:02Z")

</div>

> [@Chefguy](#):
>
> I have three sons, all solidly in the “hetero” column. I was in the military when they were growing up

Maybe you’re just in extremely deep denial. 😃

Anyway, I’m left-handed and I have no brothers. And I’m in the military.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZipperJJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zipperjj/32/211_2.png) [@ZipperJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZipperJJ)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/18 "2006-04-05T15:38:20Z")

</div>

Wait I thought a lack of father figure caused Gang Violence and general bad behavior at school.

Does this mean all the OGs are gay, too?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Antinor01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecae2f/32.png) [@Antinor01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Antinor01)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/19 "2006-04-05T15:44:49Z")

</div>

Hmm, I’m the first born in my family. Does that mean I’m not allowed to be gay anymore?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2006, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374/20 "2006-04-05T15:49:32Z")

</div>

> [@ZipperJJ](#):
>
> Wait I thought a lack of father figure caused Gang Violence and general bad behavior at school.

I thought that was video games. Or sitting too close to the television. Or something.

Man, science is _hard._

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/little-dad-time-gay-son/351374.md?page=2)
