# Lizzie Borden did she or did she not??

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [December 17, 2002, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263 "2002-12-17T05:09:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CaptMurdock](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/captmurdock/32/11736_2.png) [@CaptMurdock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CaptMurdock)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/1 "2002-12-17T05:09:05Z")

</div>

I was wondering anyone has any thoughts about the case. If so what are they and why.

Do you think Lizzie really took an ax to stepmom and dad???

Why do you think she did it?

How did she get rid of the blood and bits of matter?

What do you think happened to ax?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RobertTB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ed655f/32.png) [@RobertTB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RobertTB)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 5:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/2 "2002-12-17T05:11:04Z")

</div>

From my understanding, she gave her mother 40 whacks. Or so has been reported. Not sure what happened to her father.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Blalron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/35a633/32.png) [@Blalron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Blalron)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 5:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/3 "2002-12-17T05:14:47Z")

</div>

**Lizzie Borden took an axe, and gave her mother forty wacks. When she saw what she had done, she gave her father forty one.**

Or so the saying goes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duckster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duckster/32/1244_2.png) [@Duckster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duckster)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 5:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/4 "2002-12-17T05:21:55Z")

</div>

See

- [http://www.crimelibrary.com/lizzie/lizziemain.htm](http://www.crimelibrary.com/lizzie/lizziemain.htm)

- [http://www.lawbuzz.com/famous\_trials/lizzie\_borden/lizzie\_borden.htm](http://www.lawbuzz.com/famous_trials/lizzie_borden/lizzie_borden.htm)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lee/32/7455_2.png) [@lee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lee)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/5 "2002-12-17T13:05:40Z")

</div>

It could have been the housekeeper, at least from what I read.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ficer67](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c57346/32.png) [@Ficer67](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ficer67)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 7:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/6 "2002-12-17T19:47:19Z")

</div>

They found the axe that was used, the defense attorney had it hidden in his basement.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Corrado](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a88e4f/32.png) [@John\_Corrado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Corrado)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 8:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/7 "2002-12-17T20:01:22Z")

</div>

[I think I’ve made my opinion clear.](http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mlizzieborden.html)

**Ficer67** - from whence the info that the defense attorney had it in his basement? As far as I knew, the prosecutor had the ax in question, but the confused testimony by the police officers raised questions as to whether it really was the murder weapon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IzzyR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/2acd7d/32.png) [@IzzyR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IzzyR)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/8 "2002-12-17T20:29:31Z")

</div>

**John** , you appear to have made a minor error is saying that John Morse was Abby’s brother. He was not related to her at all - he was the brother of Lizzie’s mother (Andrew’s first wife).

Also, for your statement that:

> [@](#):
>
> But I can’t find any evidence that Lizzie was ever named in a divorce suit. Given the publicity that followed her arrest for shoplifting, it’s hard to imagine a lid could have been kept on scandals involving divorce and lesbianism.

[Here’s](http://www.lizzieandrewborden.com/Lizzie%27sSexuality.htm) what I’ve found:

> [@](#):
>
> In Agnes deMille’s Lizzie Borden, a Dance of Death we read the following: “New England novelist Esther Forbes told Agnes deMille that her father, William Trowbridge Forbes, Judge of Probate Court in Worchester County [Massachusetts], had a curious case at the turn of the century, of a man divorcing his wife on charges of lesbianism. The co-respondent named in the proceeding was Miss Lizzie A. Borden of Fall River. Judge Forbes dismissed the charges as frivolous . . .” (p. 84). Len Rebello informs me that this occurred in 1909, but that he is unable to verify the charges; one would have to have the man who filed the charges.

Not much to go by, of course, but this is probably the source of the rumor.

As compared to what I’ve read, your article is most lacking in that it leaves out the most damning evidence against Lizzie; that being her attempts to purchase poison in the week prior to the murders, and her inconsistent statements at the inquest. Both of these were not admitted at the trial which helped her beat the rap, but in considering who really did it these are of paramount significance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bosda_di_chi_of_tricor/32/16845_2.png) [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 8:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/9 "2002-12-17T20:44:24Z")

</div>

Yes, she did!

She did, she did, she did!

She **dyed her hair!**

None of this “only her hairdresser knows for sure” stuff for the Straight Dope, nossiree!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/10 "2002-12-17T21:10:14Z")

</div>

I still think it was the half brother.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vivalostwages](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/d07c76/32.png) [@vivalostwages](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vivalostwages)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/11 "2002-12-17T22:19:58Z")

</div>

In their book **The Cases That Haunt Us** , John Douglas and Mark Olshaker conclude that Lizzie most certainly did it.  
Why? She had motive, and her relationship with the fam wasn’t too good at the time. They give a much more detailed account, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Corrado](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/a88e4f/32.png) [@John\_Corrado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Corrado)\
**Post date:** [December 17, 2002, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/12 "2002-12-17T22:33:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by IzzyR \*  
> \*\ ***John** , you appear to have made a minor error is saying that John Morse was Abby’s brother. He was not related to her at all - he was the brother of Lizzie’s mother (Andrew’s first wife).

Got it. Thanks for the catch.

> [@](#):
>
> _Izzy said_  
> Also, for your statement that: [Here’s](http://www.lizzieandrewborden.com/Lizzie%27sSexuality.htm) what I’ve found:Not much to go by, of course, but this is probably the source of the rumor.

Good find- I wasn’t able to find that reference previously. Still, it’s one person making a statement with no corroboration. Great gossip, but not anything we can really consider proof.

> [@](#):
>
> _Izzy said_  
> As compared to what I’ve read, your article is most lacking in that it leaves out the most damning evidence against Lizzie; that being her attempts to purchase poison in the week prior to the murders, and her inconsistent statements at the inquest.

On the poison- really, it’s circumstantial at best. Yes, the Borden family was very ill immediately before the murders… but no evidence of poisoning was ever found, either by the autopsy or by the local doctor who had been summoned. The fact that she was trying to buy rat poison a week before her parents were butchered by an ax-murderer is not a really strong connection.

> [@](#):
>
> _From my Staff Report:_  
> And as for Lizzie–well, at first she said she had been in her room. Then she said she had been in the basement.  
> Finally, at the inquest, she stated that, after A.J. had returned home, she had spent forty minutes out in the barn looking for fishing line  
> sinkers and eating pears.

Perhaps not in much depth, but I _do_ cover her inconsistent story. Keep in mind, I was trying to write a Staff Report- there’s only so much I can say before the reader starts glazing over.

[grumble] And I _did_ say that the evidence points to her as the most likely candidate, dagummit.[/grumble]

> [@](#):
>
> Both of these were not admitted at the trial which helped her beat the rap, but in considering who really did it these are of paramount significance.

I don’t agree… again, the poison doesn’t _prove_ a thing. And her poor testimony… several police officers and witnesses _also_ gave confused, contradictory testimony. Does that mean that _they_ did it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IzzyR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/2acd7d/32.png) [@IzzyR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IzzyR)\
**Post date:** [December 18, 2002, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/13 "2002-12-18T15:52:45Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by John Corrado \*  
> On the poison- really, it’s circumstantial at best. Yes, the Borden family was very ill immediately before the murders… but no evidence of poisoning was ever found, either by the autopsy or by the local doctor who had been summoned. The fact that she was trying to buy rat poison a week before her parents were butchered by an ax-murderer is not a really strong connection.

There’s less to this than meets the eye. The “local doctor who had been summoned” did not run any medical tests to see if Abby was being poisoned. The symptoms of food poisoning are similar to those of arsenic poisoning, and the normal response is to assume that a person showing such symptoms is suffering from the former (this also appears to have been the assumption of Andrew Borden). It is only in retrospect, with the knowledge that Abby was right - there _was_ someone out to kill her - and Lizzie’s attempted purchase, that the illnesses become significant. But the doctor’s judgement in the absence of this knowledge is meaningless.

The autopsy might mean a bit more, but not much, IMHO. The autopsy did not find prussic acid, but Lizzie was unsuccessful at purchasing it (the day before the murders). The suggestion is that she might have been previously attempting to poison them with some other poison, say arsenic, which was apparently widely available. The arsenic would no longer have been in their stomachs by the time of the murders in any event.

(It is a bit misleading to refer to the prussic acid as “rat poison” - it’s not like it was being sold as a prepackaged rat poison - best I can tell it was sold as plain prussic acid. Lizzie said she needed it to get rid of moths from some article of clothing she had.)

In any event, Lizzie herself seemed to think it was significant, as she specifically denied at the inquest having attempted to purchase it. (This was contradicted by several witnesses). The fact that she apparently gave inconsistent versions of her whereabouts on the morning of the purchase does not help her case either.

Of course, this is not conclusive in and of itself. (This is true of all evidence in the case.) Still, the most likely explanation is that Lizzie resolved kill her parents with arsenic, but only succeeded in making them ill and arousing Abby’s suspicions. Then she turned to the stronger prussic acid, but was stymied in her attempts at acquiring it. Thus frustrated, she took a more direct approach.

> [@](#):
>
> Perhaps not in much depth, but I _do_ cover her inconsistent story. Keep in mind, I was trying to write a Staff Report- there’s only so much I can say before the reader starts glazing over.

> [@](#):
>
> I don’t agree… again, the poison doesn’t _prove_ a thing. And her poor testimony… several police officers and witnesses _also_ gave confused, contradictory testimony. Does that mean that _they_ did it?

Understood. But there’s inconsistencies and inconsistencies. Standard procedure in trials is for the lawyers to pick at inconsistencies in the testimony of witnesses. How successful they are is crucial in determining whether the witnesses are unreliable, liars, or merely failing to remember relatively insignificant details. In the case of Lizzie, her testimony at the [inquest](http://www.lizzieandrewborden.com/pdf%20files/Lizzie%27sInquest.pdf) was apparently inconsistent enough - about matters such as her motivation for going up to the barn (her alibi) and her whereabouts when her father came home - to be one of the causes of her being prosecuted. Keeping this testimony out of the trial was one of the key victories of the defense.

I should also add with regard to your article that while you note that some neighborhood boys said the loft was very cool, Lizzie herself agreed at the inquest that the loft was the hottest place on the premises. So either the prosecution theory (Lizzie opened a window) is correct or Lizzie had no idea how hot it was in the loft, having never been there in the first place.

Again, there’s no one piece of conclusive evidence in this case. But if you add everything up, it all points in one direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sampiro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/2acd7d/32.png) [@Sampiro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sampiro)\
**Post date:** [December 18, 2002, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/lizzie-borden-did-she-or-did-she-not/143263/14 "2002-12-18T20:56:18Z")

</div>

Hijack, but has anybody stayed in the bed & breakfast? I’m thinking of going there this summer.

> **[Lizzie Borden - Welcome To The Lizzie Borden House](https://lizzie-borden.com/)**
>
> The place of two of America’s greatest unsolved mysteries on August 4, 1892 which coined the term “Ax Murderer”. Today, the Lizzie Borden compound is many...
