Name one.
There’s also the depressing political aspect, where the Supreme Court has some ideological make-up, on the basis of Presidential appointments. It is horribly possible for the court to say Yes one day, and No the next. At least one Supreme Court Justice has publicly regretted a vote on a decision.
We have, in our history, been pretty lucky in our Justices; there haven’t been too many who were arrogantly ideological, in a kind of Humpty Dumpty fashion, decreeing that it means what they say it means. But there is, ultimately, no protection against that, any more than against a runaway Congress or a tyrannical President.
That’s one right there.
Moderator Note
Ascenray, Exapno Mapcase, and Trinopus, dial it back. I am not going to try to sort out who said what to whom, or who is accusing another poster of what. Stop making the discussion personal. No warnings issued.
Colibri
General Questions Moderator