# Logological discovery

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [March 8, 2021, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421 "2021-03-08T03:59:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/1 "2021-03-08T03:59:12Z")

</div>

Since I was a kid, I’ve always been fascinated by groups of words that differ only by changing the five vowels: bag, beg, big, bog and bug are all actual words.

Today, out of the blue, I discovered blander, blender, blinder, blonder and blunder.  
Whaddya know?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/2 "2021-03-08T04:02:47Z")

</div>

Tan ten tin ton tun!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![blabbermeister](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e9a140/32.png) [@blabbermeister](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/blabbermeister)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/3 "2021-03-08T06:53:36Z")

</div>

logological starts with “logo logi” but you already knew that

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![psychonaut](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/psychonaut/32/4655_2.png) [@psychonaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/psychonaut)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/4 "2021-03-08T14:26:49Z")

</div>

There’s also blynder, since “blynd” is an archaic spelling for “blind”, though that doesn’t add to your list a word with an entirely new meaning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scarlax](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/scarlax/32/2927_2.png) [@Scarlax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scarlax)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/5 "2021-03-08T14:47:54Z")

</div>

R\_d. I did have to look up rud, but supposedly it’s a valid scrabble word. I imagine there are a lot of 3 and 4 letter variants that qualify where one of the vowels forms an archaic word.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 2:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/6 "2021-03-08T14:52:18Z")

</div>

It turns out that someone who writes bots has a job title the same as a “Flat-bottomed Dutch sailing vessel,” so there’s always that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/7 "2021-03-08T15:30:22Z")

</div>

This is a job for … software!  
My quick & dirty script produced these 98 results.

amber ember imber omber umber  
an en in on un  
are ere ire ore ure  
as es is os us  
back beck bick bock buck  
bad bed bid bod bud  
bag beg big bog bug  
ball bell bill boll bull  
bally belly billy bolly bully  
ban ben bin bon bun  
band bend bind bond bund  
bander bender binder bonder bunder  
bang beng bing bong bung  
bat bet bit bot but  
brat bret brit brot brut  
chack check chick chock chuck  
chacker checker chicker chocker chucker  
clack cleck click clock cluck  
dab deb dib dob dub  
dacker decker dicker docker ducker  
dae dee die doe due  
daer deer dier doer duer  
dag deg dig dog dug  
dan den din don dun  
fad fed fid fod fud  
fally felly filly folly fully  
fat fet fit fot fut  
gad ged gid god gud  
gally gelly gilly golly gully  
gan gen gin gon gun  
gat get git got gut  
hack heck hick hock huck  
hall hell hill holl hull  
hap hep hip hop hup  
hat het hit hot hut  
lack leck lick lock luck  
lagger legger ligger logger lugger  
lane lene line lone lune  
last lest list lost lust  
lat let lit lot lut  
late lete lite lote lute  
ma me mi mo mu  
male mele mile mole mule  
malt melt milt molt mult  
man men min mon mun  
mang meng ming mong mung  
mare mere mire more mure  
mass mess miss moss muss  
massiness messiness missiness mossiness mussiness  
massy messy missy mossy mussy  
mate mete mite mote mute  
na ne ni no nu  
nab neb nib nob nub  
nat net nit not nut  
pack peck pick pock puck  
paddle peddle piddle poddle puddle  
pall pell pill poll pull  
pan pen pin pon pun  
pant pent pint pont punt  
pap pep pip pop pup  
pappy peppy pippy poppy puppy  
pass pess piss poss puss  
pat pet pit pot put  
patter petter pitter potter putter  
rab reb rib rob rub  
rack reck rick rock ruck  
rad red rid rod rud  
rag reg rig rog rug  
rat ret rit rot rut  
rax rex rix rox rux  
road roed roid rood roud  
sack seck sick sock suck  
san sen sin son sun  
sare sere sire sore sure  
slad sled slid slod slud  
snab sneb snib snob snub  
snack sneck snick snock snuck  
spat spet spit spot sput  
sprang spreng spring sprong sprung  
stang steng sting stong stung  
stark sterk stirk stork sturk  
strang streng string strong strung  
ta te ti to tu  
taa tae tai tao tau  
tack teck tick tock tuck  
tae tee tie toe tue  
tag teg tig tog tug  
tale tele tile tole tule  
tan ten tin ton tun  
tang teng ting tong tung  
tanner tenner tinner tonner tunner  
tate tete tite tote tute  
toa toe toi too tou  
unstack unsteck unstick unstock unstuck  
wad wed wid wod wud  
wan wen win won wun  
wat wet wit wot wut

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Exapno\_Mapcase](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/exapno_mapcase/32/1051_2.png) [@Exapno\_Mapcase](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Exapno_Mapcase)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/8 "2021-03-08T15:43:36Z")

</div>

I have a feeling that not all of those words would be allowed even in Scrabble. 🤓

daer?  
gud?  
roed?  
steng?  
taa?  
wod?  
and many more.

And others are either abbreviations (deg), archaic ('pon), or prefixes (mult).

A fun list, but [dictionary.com](http://dictionary.com) is snobbish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/9 "2021-03-08T16:19:36Z")

</div>

> [@markn\_1](#):
>
> massiness messiness missiness mossiness mussiness

My favourite set.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/10 "2021-03-08T16:25:30Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> I have a feeling that not all of those words would be allowed even in Scrabble
> 
> gud?

Never been told to “git gud, newb”? 🙂

> [@](#):
>
> roed?

“Filled with roe” - perfectly cromulent

> [@](#):
>
> taa?

That one has [at least 3](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/taa) valid meanings

Although I agree that a lot of them don’t work. _Roed_ does, but _roud_ doesn’t, for example.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/11 "2021-03-08T16:33:39Z")

</div>

My word list does have a lot of obscure and archaic words, but the six you call out are all in the OED.

daer: A beast: usually a quadruped, as distinguished from birds and fishes; but sometimes, like _beast_ , applied to animals of lower orders. _Obsolete_ .

gud: A euphemistic for _god_ [n. and int.]

roed: Of a fish: carrying roe; full of spawn.

steng: dialectical for _sting_ and _stang_ in various senses

taa: archaic form of _take_

wod: variant of several words including _void_, _wood_, _weed_, _wit_, etc.

And “roud” is defined as  
_English regional_ ( _Norfolk_ ). Now _rare_ . _intransitive_ . Of a fish: to spawn.

You can consider this list to be a superset of an acceptable list.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/12 "2021-03-08T16:36:12Z")

</div>

So is there a formal term for this sort of wordplay?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jsc1953](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/5daacb/32.png) [@jsc1953](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jsc1953)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/13 "2021-03-08T17:07:09Z")

</div>

> [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](#):
>
> Today, out of the blue, I discovered blander, blender, **blinder** , blonder and blunder.

When I read this list, I pronounced the bolded word in my head as rhyming with “tinder”, and thought: “Blinnder?? That’s not a word!!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Treppenwitz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/treppenwitz/32/3445_2.png) [@Treppenwitz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Treppenwitz)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 5:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/14 "2021-03-08T17:07:28Z")

</div>

Mmmm - addictive. I feel the need have a Y word too:

Dane  
Dene  
Dine  
Done  
Dune  
Dyne

j

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/15 "2021-03-08T22:36:39Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> So is there a formal term for this sort of wordplay?

“Logology” was coined by [Dmitri A. Borgmann](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitri_Borgmann) to represent the study of recreational linguistics. He founded _Word Ways_, a magazine devoted to this pursuit, along with writing a couple of books on the subject.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/16 "2021-03-08T22:37:13Z")

</div>

> [@markn\_1](#):
>
> This is a job for … software!  
> My quick & dirty script produced these 98 results.

Thank you very much for this list. It’s going in my vade mecum now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/17 "2021-03-08T22:38:00Z")

</div>

> [@psychonaut](#):
>
> There’s also blynder, since “blynd” is an archaic spelling for “blind”, though that doesn’t add to your list a word with an entirely new meaning.

I don’t care about the new meaning bit. I’ve checked the OED and W2, and they agree with you. So, huzzah!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/18 "2021-03-08T22:42:55Z")

</div>

_Word Ways_ is still being produced quarterly by Butler University, IN. [Here](https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/wordways/) is its website complete with access to some free back issues.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 10:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/19 "2021-03-08T22:43:36Z")

</div>

> [@Treppenwitz](#):
>
> Mmmm - addictive. I feel the need have a Y word too:
> 
> Dane  
> Dene  
> Dine  
> Done  
> Dune  
> Dyne

Yeah, I always wanted to add “y” to the group, but they’re about as rare as hen’s teeth.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421/20 "2021-03-08T22:44:59Z")

</div>

> [@Exapno\_Mapcase](#):
>
> I have a feeling that not all of those words would be allowed even in Scrabble. 🤓
> 
> daer?  
> gud?  
> roed?  
> steng?  
> taa?  
> wod?  
> and many more.
> 
> And others are either abbreviations (deg), archaic ('pon), or prefixes (mult).
> 
> A fun list, but [dictionary.com](http://dictionary.com) is snobbish.

I’m a lot less picky than Scrabble or [dictionary.com](http://dictionary.com). Abolete archaisms are fine with me. 😀

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/logological-discovery/937421.md?page=2)
