# Loki TV series discussion (spoilers)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** disney-hulu\
**Created:** [January 27, 2021, 6:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625 "2021-01-27T18:06:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnoitall](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bb73d2/32.png) [@gnoitall](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gnoitall)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2021, 4:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/201 "2021-06-20T04:31:56Z")

</div>

> [@Taber](#):
>
> And of course, the Variant being a woman doesn’t rule out that it is this Loki

There’s an accidental spoiler that challenges that conclusion. It’s in the foreign-language credits of Ep 2.

One language credit accidentally gives a name to the Variant, and it isn’t “Loki”. In fact, it’s the name of another character from the comics entirely, abeit one with a lot of Loki interaction.

(Not my discovery; I saw it in some random Youtube about Ep 2, but it’s pretty interesting.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Reluctant\_A](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/839c29/32.png) [@Reluctant\_A](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Reluctant_A)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2021, 4:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/202 "2021-06-20T04:44:57Z")

</div>

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> My theory about the Sacred Timeline and Captain America:
> 
> The universe that the TVA establish as the Sacred Timeline is the one where the Avengers go back in time to stop Thanos.
> 
> If that’s the case, and the current Sacred Timeline is the one of the films, they need to allow Rogers to go back and live with Carter. Because in the baseline timeline Rogers returns as an old man and gives the shield to Falcon. In order for him to exist and give that shield, the Carter/Rogers timeline needs to exist at least as long as it takes for Rogers to port over to the Sacred Timeline and give the gift.
> 
> I’d think that Rogers probably turned that world into a God-damn utopia.

To me, it’s been obvious that this is exactly what happened, ever since I saw _Endgame_, and it took me months to grok that anybody could see it as happening any other way. Cap went back in time, to “get a life” with Peggy. He/they continued to be Big Damn Hero(es), and used Steve’s knowledge of the future to avert the atrocities that happened in the Sacred Timeline, and turned that divergent timeline into, as you said, a “God-damn utopia.” Then, after Peggy passed, he put the final stone back where it belonged, thereby collapsing the divergent timeline, and putting everything back like it’s supposed to be.

As to why the TVA let him get away with it? Because he’s Captain Fucking America, that’s why. And he gave them his word that he would set things right, and they believed him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Half\_Man\_Half\_Wit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/half_man_half_wit/32/21766_2.png) [@Half\_Man\_Half\_Wit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Half_Man_Half_Wit)\
**Post date:** [June 20, 2021, 7:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/203 "2021-06-20T07:32:50Z")

</div>

> [@Reluctant\_A](#):
>
> Then, after Peggy passed, he put the final stone back where it belonged, thereby collapsing the divergent timeline, and putting everything back like it’s supposed to be.

That sorta strikes me as more monstrous than Thanos’ plan—after all, he only intended to kill half the universe, but this effectively destroys a complete reality. I can more readily imagine that Cap decided to become a house-husband for the remainder of his life than that he’d first allow to come into being, then annihilate untold trillions of beings for the sake of his own happily ever after.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 2:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/204 "2021-06-21T14:40:03Z")

</div>

> [@Half\_Man\_Half\_Wit](#):
>
> > [@Reluctant\_A](#):
> >
> > Then, after Peggy passed, he put the final stone back where it belonged, thereby collapsing the divergent timeline, and putting everything back like it’s supposed to be.
> 
> That sorta strikes me as more monstrous than Thanos’ plan—after all, he only intended to kill half the universe, but this effectively destroys a complete reality.

Was it really real if it wasn’t supposed to happen and in the end didn’t? Sounds more like the destruction of a hypothesis. (Or, in other words, time travel is nonsensical. 😃 )

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sauron](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ce7236/32.png) [@Sauron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sauron)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 4:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/205 "2021-06-21T16:00:30Z")

</div>

Two episodes in, and I’m enjoying this show waaaay more than I did _Falcon and Winter Soldier_ and _WandaVision_. Primarily because Hiddleston is just such a fantastic actor – perfect casting for Loki.

I’m not a huge Owen Wilson fan, but he’s nailing this performance, in my opinion. He reminds me a lot of Wynn Duffy from _Justified_, both in looks and mannerisms (including speech patterns). The interplay between him and Hiddleston is great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/206 "2021-06-21T16:58:04Z")

</div>

> [@Reluctant\_A](#):
>
> To me, it’s been obvious that this is exactly what happened, ever since I saw _Endgame_, and it took me months to grok that anybody could see it as happening any other way. Cap went back in time, to “get a life” with Peggy. He/they continued to be Big Damn Hero(es), and used Steve’s knowledge of the future to avert the atrocities that happened in the Sacred Timeline, and turned that divergent timeline into, as you said, a “God-damn utopia.” Then, after Peggy passed, he put the final stone back where it belonged, thereby collapsing the divergent timeline, and putting everything back like it’s supposed to be.

Given how much the smart guys in the main timeline have managed to accomplish, you’d maybe think that thinkers in the “utopia” timeline would ably get to work on solving the, y’know, “collapsing” problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/207 "2021-06-21T17:23:34Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> Was it really real if it wasn’t supposed to happen and in the end didn’t? Sounds more like the destruction of a hypothesis. (Or, in other words, time travel is nonsensical. 😃 )

Except the people in that timeline weren’t “hypothetical,” they were real people with feelings, thoughts, hopes, etc. etc. If you do something to “collapse” that timeline, then everyone in it stops existing. I don’t really see how that’s different from just murdering them. I don’t think you can get around that by arguing, “Well, they were never supposed to exist in the first place, so it doesn’t matter what happens to them.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eburacum\_45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eburacum_45/32/3385_2.png) [@eburacum\_45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eburacum_45)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/208 "2021-06-21T17:31:13Z")

</div>

The ethical solution is that all timelines continue to exist, even if some of them are no longer accessible from the others. Even any hellish, evil ones created by (for instance) Thanos, Malkeith or Evil Loki exist somewhere out there, but you can’t get to them, so they effectively have been destroyed. Ditto the utopias.

But I have a strange feeling that is not the solution the TVA (or the MCU) are adopting. Time travel where entire universes wither and die because they are ‘wrong’, is unethical time travel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/209 "2021-06-21T18:17:59Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Except the people in that timeline weren’t “hypothetical,” they were real people with feelings, thoughts, hopes, etc. etc.

The tricky part is that they didn’t happen. Or, to put it another way, when a timeline is pruned, it never occurred.

Let’s use a show analogy. When a show is produced, the director records many takes of some scenes. There might even be some rewrites and reshoots. All that footage goes to the editor, who then cuts and combines them into a final product. The unused footage simply never happened within the context of that show. That footage is simply hypothetical versions of what could have happened, but never did.

When the TVA prunes timelines, it’s simply editing away unused versions of reality.

I’m being somewhat of a devil’s advocate here. I don’t really believe this argument, but I don’t think it can be simply dismissed. It also makes for an interesting philosophical discussion. Are multiverses equally real? What does real even mean when talking about multiverses?

Edited to add: how many times can one use “simply”? Answer: simply too many.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amarinth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3be4f8/32.png) [@amarinth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/amarinth)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/210 "2021-06-21T19:17:24Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Except the people in that timeline weren’t “hypothetical,” they were real people with feelings, thoughts, hopes, etc. etc.

Were they?  
Depending on the timeline splinter in question, many people would have nearly the same life, if not a wholly identical life, in both timelines. So are you really killing a person? If the version of me where some guy was late to work ends - while the version of me where that guy was on time goes on, both versions have (up to that point - and probably beyond) the same history, feelings, hopes, dreams thoughts… I’m not sure that’s actually killing me.

Multiverse ethics are odd.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/211 "2021-06-21T19:24:02Z")

</div>

> [@amarinth](#):
>
> I’m not sure that’s actually killing me.

It’s not killing you, but it’s definitely killing _them_.

If someone showed up at your door and said, “Hey, turns out you’re an illegal clone. We’re going to have to kill you. But don’t worry, we got the original right here to take your house and all your stuff. Nobody will know the difference.” Would you just be like, “Okay, fair play. Do I have to sign something?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/212 "2021-06-21T19:48:57Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> If someone showed up at your door and said, “Hey, turns out you’re an illegal clone. We’re going to have to kill you. But don’t worry, we got the original right here to take your house and all your stuff.

A clone is an artificial twin, a separate individual person. A timeline that’s pruned has possibilities that never come to fruition.

Let’s say I imagine myself eating a ham sandwich for lunch tomorrow. When tomorrow comes, I eat a tuna sandwich. Have I killed my ham-sandwich-eating self?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/213 "2021-06-21T20:34:23Z")

</div>

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> Let’s say I imagine myself eating a ham sandwich for lunch tomorrow. When tomorrow comes, I eat a tuna sandwich. Have I killed my ham-sandwich-eating self?

No. However, if you invent a time machine, travel to the alternate reality where you ate a ham sandwich, and shoot your ham-sandwich-eating-self in the head, then yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/214 "2021-06-21T20:43:11Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> if you invent a time machine, travel to the alternate reality

That is the crux of the issue. Are the alternate timelines alternate realities or alternate hypotheticals? It’s not clear to me. What is the reasoning to call the alternate timelines “real”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikecurtis](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mikecurtis/32/3284_2.png) [@mikecurtis](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mikecurtis)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/215 "2021-06-21T20:43:37Z")

</div>

What if, after eating the ham sandwich, his timeline just ends? No death, just nothing? The timeline has been “pruned” from going any further.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ekedolphin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ekedolphin/32/10003_2.png) [@ekedolphin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ekedolphin)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 8:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/216 "2021-06-21T20:46:02Z")

</div>

I wonder if this Loki variant (I mean the protagonist of this series; the one played by Tom Hiddleston) will be allowed to continue existing at the conclusion of the series, or if he’ll be pruned. I would very much like to see Loki in another MCU movie, or perhaps in a season 2 of this series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 9:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/217 "2021-06-21T21:12:52Z")

</div>

> [@mikecurtis](#):
>
> What if, after eating the ham sandwich, his timeline just ends? No death, just nothing? The timeline has been “pruned” from going any further.

That still seems like death to me. The guy existed, then he didn’t. Isn’t that what death is? Why does it make a difference if he stops existing because someone put a .38 slug in his head, versus stopping existence because someone collapsed the time-space continuum?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/218 "2021-06-21T21:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@ekedolphin](#):
>
> I wonder if this Loki variant (I mean the protagonist of this series; the one played by Tom Hiddleston) will be allowed to continue existing at the conclusion of the series, or if he’ll be pruned.

I imagine that Marvel/Disney realize that he’s a very popular character, and played by an actor who’s become a favorite among fans (and who clearly loves the role). I’ll be stunned if they don’t leave some sort of route for Loki to return to MCU films at the end of the series.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/219 "2021-06-21T21:38:09Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Why does it make a difference if he stops existing because someone put a .38 slug in his head, versus stopping existence because someone collapsed the time-space continuum?

I’m in agreement with you that the actions of the TVA, as we seem to understand them so far, are… I’m not sure that there is a word that properly conveys just how horrible their actions are, but lets just say… bad.

However, those within the TVA probably have justifications for what they do, no one thinks that _they_ are the villain. Somehow the fact that the victim didn’t just stop existing, but never existed at all makes the act more ethical, in a way (that I personally don’t agree with.)

Let’s say that someone goes back in time and prevents your parents from meeting, did they actually _kill_ you in this new timeline?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [June 21, 2021, 9:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625/220 "2021-06-21T21:43:55Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> However, those within the TVA probably have justifications for what they do, no one thinks that _they_ are the villain. Somehow the fact that the victim didn’t just stop existing, but never existed at all makes the act more ethical, in a way (that I personally don’t agree with.)

Right. I’m interested in proving this point of view wrong.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/loki-tv-series-discussion-spoilers/931625.md?page=12)
