# Maddow's Trump Tax Return announcement

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [March 15, 2017, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204 "2017-03-15T00:29:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TonySinclair](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/49beb7/32.png) [@TonySinclair](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TonySinclair)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/61 "2017-03-15T06:03:21Z")

</div>

> [@Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](#):
>
> If Fox News did what Maddow did, there would be Liberals squealing like stuck pigs.

If Fox News could ever hope to do what Maddow does, monkeys would fly out of my butt.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TonySinclair](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/49beb7/32.png) [@TonySinclair](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TonySinclair)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 6:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/62 "2017-03-15T06:10:26Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> Because he didn’t need to. All he needed to do is give this information to the IRS - which he did - and convince enough people that he should be President to be elected - which he also did. He was under no obligation to share confidential information about a private citizen with the media.

No\*\*\* legal\*\*\* obligation, just like all the other candidates who have voluntarily done it anyway. Because they are willing to let the voters see that they are not lying.

Of course, Trump voters quite obviously don’t care how much he lies. Orange is not the new black.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johnny\_Ace](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/6bbea6/32.png) [@Johnny\_Ace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johnny_Ace)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 6:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/63 "2017-03-15T06:57:27Z")

</div>

Something that jumps out at me immediately: line 21 under ‘Other Income.’ It’s over $100M in _losses_. So that $150M income for the year is actually more like $50M, as stated on line 22. As mentioned above, there’s no info as to what incurred the losses, though.

I’m no CPA, but I’m betting a lot of those taxes were on real estate deals.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Novelty\_Bobble](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a3d4f5/32.png) [@Novelty\_Bobble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Novelty_Bobble)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 8:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/64 "2017-03-15T08:36:28Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> The reporter for this story made that same point, since he has no clear idea where it came from. Could be, I suppose, release something innocuous and make a big deal about how innocuous it was, like that would prove something. Risk would be that it might whet our appetite rather than squelch investigation.
> 
> But what makes sense, when you are dealing with people who don’t make sense to begin with?

My thoughts too. If you had access to, and were of a mind to leak, any of Trump’s tax returns and had malice in mind why would you  
a) Release this year and only this year?  
b) Release these pages and only these pages?

cui bono?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 11:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/65 "2017-03-15T11:38:56Z")

</div>

> [@Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](#):
>
> If Fox News did what Maddow did, there would be Liberals squealing like stuck pigs.

Does this pig-squealing hypothetical involve Fox News releasing Trump’s tax returns, which we’ve all been clamoring for, or Hillary’s tax returns, which she has already made public?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jshore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b5e925/32.png) [@jshore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jshore)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 11:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/66 "2017-03-15T11:51:06Z")

</div>

> [@JKellyMap](#):
>
> To clarify, that’s 4% (not \*negative \*4) without the Alternative Minimum, but 25% with it (what he actually paid).

Yes, that was a hyphen, not a negative sign.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 11:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/67 "2017-03-15T11:54:59Z")

</div>

I think it’s quite likely that this was deliberately leaked by Dolt 45 himself. Reasons:

1- I get more publicity. There is no such thing as bad publicity.  
2- Hey, look at me! I’m rich!  
3- I paid taxes! Neener neener neener!  
4- Heh heh. While they’re fixating on my taxes, I can continue to gut the EPA and dismantle the safety net.  
By not leaking the schedules, we don’t see the juicier part of the return. Just cold numbers.

Under the BobLibDem government, all tax returns of all payers would be public information. Run for office, we have your tax returns. Want to know what your dipstick brother in law makes? Download it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/68 "2017-03-15T12:45:13Z")

</div>

> [@Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](#):
>
> If Fox News did what Maddow did, there would be Liberals squealing like stuck pigs.

But that’s different!

There’s a higher principle involved, and sometimes lesser considerations must be swept aside in pursuit of a greater good. Therefore the SDMB must respect the _summum bonum_ - the one and shining Truth that shapes all reality, and before which all other lesser considerations, like consistency and the rule of law, must give way.

IOKIADDI.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/69 "2017-03-15T12:55:41Z")

</div>

No, this wasn’t the biggest deal in the world, especially since all we have is the basic two pages, and none of the supporting schedules. And it’s still not so much his tax returns we need to see, but his business assets and liabilities. Especially those liabilities: who’s he in hock to?

But the AMT thing is at least a medium-sized deal, given his strong opposition to it.

The AMT, as others have noted in this thread, took him from paying 4% on his income - being taxed like a poor person - to paying 25% - being taxed like an upper middle class person.

This shows why it’s important that we know more than we do about his financial affairs, because even this little tidbit shows that he’d personally benefit from AMT repeal, to the tune of tens of millions of dollars per year.

The problem is there’s so much more we \*\*don’t \*\*know about what he might do as President that would benefit him personally. We need to know what he owns, and what he owes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/70 "2017-03-15T13:00:00Z")

</div>

What exactly would be the equivalent from Fox News? All the Democratic candidates recently have released their tax records.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/71 "2017-03-15T13:00:07Z")

</div>

> [@Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](#):
>
> If Fox News did what Maddow did, there would be Liberals squealing like stuck pigs.

If Fox News ever releases the tax returns of a candidate for President, Congress, or governor of a state, I’ll say: good for them.

If they want to release Hillary Clinton’s or Barack Obama’s or Bernie Sanders’ 2005 tax returns tomorrow, they should go for it. No complaints from me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grumman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/43a26b/32.png) [@Grumman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grumman)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/72 "2017-03-15T13:11:18Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> What exactly would be the equivalent from Fox News?

That’s easy: releasing Hillary’s medical records.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/73 "2017-03-15T13:16:04Z")

</div>

> [@Grumman](#):
>
> That’s easy: releasing Hillary’s medical records.

While I don’t think they’re equivalent (and I think she did release some medical records), I doubt liberals would be particularly upset if Fox News did that during the campaign. If CNN or MSNBC got them they’d probably publish them too. It would be news, after all, just as Trump’s tax records are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wesley\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wesley_clark/32/20581_2.png) [@Wesley\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wesley_Clark)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/74 "2017-03-15T13:17:40Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> I never understood this obsession with tax returns. I can’t imagine a situational where it would make a difference for whom I voted.

We don’t know to what degree his income is dependent on hostile nations or a handful of wealthy individuals like Russian and Chinese investors.

I’m listening to a podcast of Maddow, nothing spectacular about this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Clothahump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/51bf81/32.png) [@Clothahump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Clothahump)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/75 "2017-03-15T13:47:05Z")

</div>

> [@ckalli1998](#):
>
> The only thing that Maddow’s announcement revealed is that Trump is, yes, a wealthy and successful businessman who made over $150 million in 2005, and then legally paid the IRS $38 million in taxes—as he was supposed to do.
> 
> There’s nothing illegal or untoward about this revelation, at all. But it is fodder for Maddow’s liberal viewers who are obsessed with Mr. Trump’s tax returns and might help them keep their ratings, I suppose, which appears to have been the goal of this segment.

The other thing it revealed is that Maddow is a barking idiot. Well, not revealed as much as reinforced. And it will be interesting to see if there is any legal action taken over this. I believe that tax returns are confidential, and if so, it would be amusing to see Trump sue her and NBC for illegally revealing the return.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/76 "2017-03-15T13:56:44Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> The other thing it revealed is that Maddow is a barking idiot. Well, not revealed as much as reinforced. And it will be interesting to see if there is any legal action taken over this. I believe that tax returns are confidential, and if so, it would be amusing to see Trump sue her and NBC for illegally revealing the return.

NBC’s legal team must have determined that they are on solid legal ground before allowing the report to air. There will be no suit and it wasn’t illegal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DoctorJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctorj/32/2904_2.png) [@DoctorJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DoctorJ)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 1:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/77 "2017-03-15T13:58:46Z")

</div>

A friend of mine put it very well: this was a compelling infomercial for leaking more of Trump’s tax returns to the Rachel Maddow Show (or, preferably, to David Cay Johnston).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jshore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/b5e925/32.png) [@jshore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/jshore)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/78 "2017-03-15T14:06:38Z")

</div>

> [@Clothahump](#):
>
> The other thing it revealed is that Maddow is a barking idiot. Well, not revealed as much as reinforced. And it will be interesting to see if there is any legal action taken over this. I believe that tax returns are confidential, and if so, it would be amusing to see Trump sue her and NBC for illegally revealing the return.

Unfortunately for Republican authoritarians like yourself, we still live in a democracy that has strong protections for freedom of the press. While the individual who leaked these might be subject to legal prosecution, the news media won’t be.

As for Maddow, what specifically what idiotic about what she said?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Martin\_Hyde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/47e85d/32.png) [@Martin\_Hyde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Martin_Hyde)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 2:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/79 "2017-03-15T14:15:24Z")

</div>

FWIW David Cay Johnston has been deep-diving in Trump’s finances for _years_, and basically takes the position that Trump is a crook. Not the rule bending kind, but the outright criminal kind, with ties to organized crime and all kinds of other illegality. Johnston at least thinks it’s entirely possible Trump is the one who sent him the tax returns, and it’d be in line with the kind of media manipulations Trump has engaged in in the past.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [March 15, 2017, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204/80 "2017-03-15T14:30:50Z")

</div>

> [@jshore](#):
>
> Unfortunately for Republican authoritarians like yourself, we still live in a democracy that has strong protections for freedom of the press. While the individual who leaked these might be subject to legal prosecution, the news media won’t be.
> 
> As for Maddow, what specifically what idiotic about what she said?

Well, she’s no Sean Hannity. Right, **Clot**?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/maddows-trump-tax-return-announcement/782204.md?page=5)
