# Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT FOUR **URL:** \ **Category:** The Game Room\ **Created:** [January 6, 2009, 11:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-four/480155 "2009-01-06T23:54:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 13
**Author:** ![Natlaw](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a88e57/32.png) [@Natlaw](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Natlaw)\ **Post date:** [January 7, 2009, 11:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-four/480155/13 "2009-01-07T11:48:55Z")
Farewell, **DiggitCamara** , now you can talk with the death without knocks :(. Only one Night kill probably means out vigilante is careful and doesn’t want to reduce our current numbers advantage. It could be no vigilante and a scum double kill on Night One (but **macey** the Strongman was dead), so that seems unlikely. > [@Millit\_the\_Frail](#): > > I was also wondering whether the scum would play chicken with the Doc(s) and try to take out a power role or head in the other direction and whittle down the claimed vanillas. We know the answer to that one now too. It looks too me they did both: **Diggit** s power was easiest to verify with the knocks and his power don’t makes much sense for scum or PFK. So that would have made him semi-confirmed as town. So Scum took out a semi-confirmed town power role, who most likely wouldn’t be protected (we only got the knocks this morning, while scum already knew he wasn’t scum). **Diggit** might have had others powers as well: **Story** remained pretty vague and I asked Diggit to post his role PM, but he didn’t do that. So his loss might hurt more than it seems (his ask-questions-of-the-dead power isn’t that useful without an dead investigator with info). > [@Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT THREE](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-three/479484/63): > > > [@Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT THREE](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-three/479484/58): > > > > Rereading **Hawk** / **Cookies** now we know Hawk is town, I couldn’t find much that is useful now. A lot depends what Cookies’ alignment is, so for future reference, since votes for **peekercpa** hide a lot: > > > > If Cookies is town, I would expect scum to support Hawk. > > Why? I would assume scum might just try to push for more interaction between Cookie/Hawk but without really supporting either. If we did have a Town on Town-situation, scum could have been encouraging the dicussing without blatant support of either one of them. I missed this Yesterday, but you’re right: it would be true only if Hawk scum / Cookies town. I already noticed I was missing the ignoring-both card pile, so I’ll have to recheck that analysis anyway when we know more about **Cookies** alignment. **peekercpa** did give a perfect excuse to smudge either without voting. [QUOTE=JSexton] I don’t recall that. Who’s been attacking him [_amrussell_]? [/QUOTE] **Hawkeyeop** had him scummy for defending **macey** and **NAF** named him Yesterday as well. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-four/480155)._