# Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT ONE

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [December 19, 2008, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854 "2008-12-19T03:11:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 268

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hawkeyeop](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/958977/32.png) [@Hawkeyeop](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hawkeyeop)\
**Post date:** [December 25, 2008, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854/268 "2008-12-25T01:12:17Z")

</div>

> [@ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies](#):
>
> This statement sticks out to me like a sore thumb. With a single brush stroke you are a) dismissing argument quality as a variable to be considered during analysis and b) advocating instead for an analysis strategy that has a significant false positive rate.

Let me be clear. If player A accuses player B of being scum, the quality of A’s argument is important in determining whether player B is scum. I just don’t think it is terribly useful in determining if player A is scum.

> [@](#):
>
> I’d also be extremely curious as to how you are going to define “when players support other players” and “when they don’t”.

Funny (well probably not) you should ask. I’m almost positive you will come up as likely scum. I’ll try to get the full analysis with detailed explanation posted in the next day or two.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854)._