# Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT ONE

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [December 19, 2008, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854 "2008-12-19T03:11:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 294

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stanislaus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stanislaus/32/3391_2.png) [@Stanislaus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stanislaus)\
**Post date:** [December 26, 2008, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854/294 "2008-12-26T16:11:47Z")

</div>

> [@dotchan](#):
>
> **amrussel** , the reason Thing Fish fell under suspicion was to suggest that the lynch pool was only two candidates (in fact, his words were remarkably similar to yours :dubious: ), but don’t take our word for it, read Day One for yourself.

I find this post a little smudgy:

1. What exactly did I say that was so similar to the highly suspicious thing said by the vote leader? A quote would be nice, because it feels like you’re trying to throw me into the same boat without offering any evidence.

2. Again, if you want to accuse me of skimming, you can come right out and say so. I wanted the people voting for Thing Fish to restate the case because a) carry-over votes should come with a carry-over case; b) townie voters are the best people to summarise the case and c) any scum voters will be reluctant or less able to give a neat précis because their reasoning is by definition spurious.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854)._