# Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT ONE **URL:** \ **Category:** The Game Room\ **Created:** [December 19, 2008, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854 "2008-12-19T03:11:59Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 302
**Author:** ![Thing\_Fish](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ecb155/32.png) [@Thing\_Fish](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thing_Fish)\ **Post date:** [December 26, 2008, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854/302 "2008-12-26T21:32:14Z")
Actually, I wouldn’t call **Hawk’s** case against **NAF** strong. It basically boils down to that\*\* NAF\*\* considered voting for either of two people, and chose the one who is still unconfirmed over the one who is known scum. I don’t see **Hawk’s** long posts above as being scummy, but they are pretty much what **Cookies** predicted they would be: putting people who voted for **macey** mostly into the pro-Town pile, those who didn’t into the neutral or pro-scum pile, and those who argued against it into the scum pile, with a few exceptions that seem very subjective. It does seem like **amrussell** argued much more forcefully than **Cookies** did against the **macey** lynch, so I’m mildly curious why **Hawk** voted for **Cookies**. But he did say he would be happy to vote for\*\* amrussell\*\*, so I don’t see it as being suspicious. I don’t know that any of the above was very helpful…I just felt like writing a post in this game that didn’t mention **Pleonast.** --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854)._