# Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT SEVEN **URL:** \ **Category:** The Game Room\ **Created:** [January 22, 2009, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-seven/482492 "2009-01-22T18:47:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 149
**Author:** ![special\_ed](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5ac83/32.png) [@special\_ed](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/special_ed)\ **Post date:** [January 27, 2009, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-seven/482492/149 "2009-01-27T16:38:32Z")
> [@Natlaw](#): > > I thought the point of the _confirmed_ voting together was that they were (semi) confirmed - and you’re not, but acting like you are. Not that it’s working to great in my opinion, but you seems to confuse it even more. > I can think of a reason, but since most seemed to be against a mass claim, but maybe the masons will consider a mason/not mason verdict on you? Since it is still Night that can wait till later in the Day, if needed at all of course. Yes, I’m aware I’m not confirmed. I’ve never claimed to be confirmed. I’ve attached a bit more validity to the arguements of the confirmed, and I’ve tried to increase the power of their voting block by voting with them, when they could be cohesive. Does that make me Town? No, of course not, as Scum I could be trying to hide in their shadow. But does it mean I’m Scum? no. > [@Natlaw](#): > > And, [you left out this post](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10678583&postcount=306) where I did detail my suspicions of Hal > > And didn’t you vote for [Hal](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10692581&postcount=106) [for](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10693904&postcount=165)[your](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10693703&postcount=139) [own](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10694050&postcount=177) [reasons](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10694069&postcount=181) and switched to MHaye because the confirmed did? But now you say you were lax with reasons to vote Hal. And, [you left out this post](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10678583&postcount=306) where I did detail my suspicions of Hal. (you’ll find the link to it in the first of your posts accusing me of not having reasons. However, you misrepresent what I said. I said I was lax in finding my own reason _since_ my vote for **Hal** , meaning, after the vote for **Hal**. I obviously had my reasons for voting for **Hal** , despite my departure from that to try to vote for \*\*MHaye \*\*when the confirmed Town were leaning that way. I went back to **Hal** , again for my own reasons, when the confirmed abandoned the \*\*MHaye \*\*lynch aftter his claim. I apologize if I’m not making myself clear. > [@Natlaw](#): > > On its own, voting 3 Scum, 1 PFK and 2 Town looks nice, but the scum votes were late and one town vote saved a scum. A point in favor is that you had a vote for Hal before MHaye was in danger. The first Scum vote ( **macey** ) wasn’t late and it was while the case was still close. The other 2 Scum votes were late, but, I can’t recall off the top of my head, didn’t I put both \*\*MHaye \*\*and \*\*JSexton \*\*over the top in getting them lynched when Town was split? Does it prove me to be Town? no. Do I think it’s odd that it’s being used as a basis of calling me Scum? Yes. > [@Natlaw](#): > > I’m not concentrating on you not just because of your voting record, but because you seem too eager to appear town. > Perhaps you did confuse **Hal** / **Mhaye** above and I would expect a scum to be a bit more subtle, but for now: How did I confuse them? Did I state something unclearly? What part don’t you understand. Also, I don’t feel like I’m eagrly trying to appear town. I’m trying to play for a town win, yes, and I’m defending myself from the case made against me, yes, but I don’t think I’m being overly eager --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-seven/482492)._