# Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT THREE

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-three/479484>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [January 1, 2009, 6:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-three/479484 "2009-01-01T18:31:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 52

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Natlaw](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/a88e57/32.png) [@Natlaw](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Natlaw)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2009, 12:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-three/479484/52 "2009-01-03T12:40:31Z")

</div>

> [@Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT TWO](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-two/478862/95):
>
> Here’s Diggit on the case for Chucara:
> 
> > [@Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT TWO](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-two/478862/95):
> >
> > I can’t answer for anyone else, but \*\*NAF \*\*(?) talked about a subtle fishing attempt on her(?) part.
> > 
> > I looked at her(?) posts from Day One and felt **NAF** was spot on. And that’s why I voted for her(?).
> > 
> > My vote remains on \*\*Chucara \*\*because **macey** ’s blatant fishing was proven to be fishing. And it makes \*\*Chucara \*\*a good candidate.
> 
> What kind of case is this? No quotes, no links. “Someone else said there was a case, and I agreed.”

That was his recap, his original case against **Chucara** (a while after **NAF** voted Chucara):

> [@Mafia: Evil Dead - DAY/NIGHT ONE](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-one/477854/189):
>
> I can’t say (s)he is really a strong candidate in my book, but for:
> 
> 1. Scarce participation
> 2. Pretty ugly participation (in her/his posts (s)he speaks only about potential outing of masons and about “A” and “B” power outings)  
> I’ll **vote Chucara**

Both DiggitCamara and Chucara have 11 posts in Day/Night One thread (though I think Chucara made more in the Night than Day). But there were about ten posters with less than Chucara.  
Chucara gave sensible reasons when masons should claim (and did not agree with them claiming Day one).  
Chucara did fish for a/b though, till pedescribe bit in Night One. If it is a mechanic the last PFK uses, Chucara could be that one. But a scum Diggit would only know he is not scum, so be OK to lynch him.

Now Chucara has claimed vanilla town with a random Alpha Beta and a lynch wish.  
Very odd, especially since he had at that point four votes and DiggitCamara two (3-3 now). If he counted on it that we would not lynch a townie to confirm NAF, it buys him a day for the investigation and if it returns FALSE he would say “Correct I’m Beta, no need to lynch me”.

I’ll let my vote stay on **Chucara** for now. If we do not lynch him, but do investigate, it _should_ be on “I’m vanilla town”, not with Alpha/Beta messing up the result.  
Personally, I would **investigate Zeriel** , because **dotchan** and **Chucara** posted more to analyze than **Zeriel** did (five posts, no votes so far). So we could use more information about him, but that is choice.  
Anyone thinks confirming vanilla is a good idea in principle (NAF seems to have). The extra claimed vanilla now kinda force us though.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-evil-dead-day-night-three/479484)._