# Mafia Reunion Day 4

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-4/778699>\
**Category:** Thread Games\
**Created:** [January 31, 2017, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-4/778699 "2017-01-31T21:14:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 674

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paulwhoisaghost](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e5b9ba/32.png) [@paulwhoisaghost](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/paulwhoisaghost)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2017, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-4/778699/674 "2017-02-11T23:57:02Z")

</div>

> [@Mafia Reunion Day 5](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-5/779271/406):
>
> The votes on D3 that I saw for ProfP that I remember were largely for him being fluffy (and frankly, I don’t think being low-post-count or fluffy is super vote-able–it’s a null tell to me, as long as they vote). I also didn’t really agree with Pleo’s characterization of his “lynch the cult” plan as fully pro-scum. As for why I switched my position and voted for him–and for some reason I thought I posted about this but clearly I did not– **once Pleo was revealed,** following the person he abruptly locked on to and voted for repeatedly seemed like a good way to nail a scum.

This is confusing to me. It sounds like an explanation for voting Prof P today, but it doesn’t explain your D4 vote. Pleo was still alive D4. Your reasoning for you D4 vote was

> [@Zeriel](#):
>
> On initial read of the day:
> 
> I was already previously happy with both the multilynch and the Prof as a scum candidate.
> 
> **vote Prof Pepperwinkle**

How can Pleo’s reveal be the missing gap between not understanding and being happy with the case when Pleo was still alive?

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-4/778699)._
