# Mafia Reunion - Day 9 **URL:** \ **Category:** Thread Games\ **Created:** [March 7, 2017, 9:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-9/781651 "2017-03-07T21:58:59Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 77
**Author:** ![Captain\_Klutz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/captain_klutz/32/4993_2.png) [@Captain\_Klutz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Klutz)\ **Post date:** [March 9, 2017, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-9/781651/77 "2017-03-09T03:00:37Z")
> [@Hawkeyeop](#): > > The first two cultists revealed were the first deacon and second deacon. My assumption (perhaps not everyone else’s) was that the rest would be 3-5. One of the surprising parts of Koldanar’s claim was that he didn’t have a # and had a different power then the revealed cultists. Sinjin, if we take things at face value, also has no # and has a different power. So for this to work the scum would have needed to know that not all cultists were the same. I’m not sure why they would know that. Exactly. **Sinjin** , how could scum possibly have that knowledge? I made this same point yesterDay: > [@Mafia Reunion: Day Eight](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-eight/781068/63): > > Prior to **Koldanar’s** claim, the cult was regarded as comprising 5 deacons, numbered 1 to 5. For someone to false claim to be a different type of cultist is a rather high risk gamble. If there were indeed 5 deacons, then number 5 would surely have spoken up by now. For these reasons I think that Koldanar is indeed a cultist. > > If there are any other deacons left, I suggest investigating Koldanar toNight and coming forward toMorrow. (Come forward toMorrow rather than toDay, as Mafia have shown they want to interfere with any confirmation attempt) --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-9/781651)._