# Mafia Reunion - Day One **URL:** \ **Category:** Thread Games\ **Created:** [January 7, 2017, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-one/776577 "2017-01-07T22:01:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 953
**Author:** ![Captain\_Klutz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/captain_klutz/32/4993_2.png) [@Captain\_Klutz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Klutz)\ **Post date:** [January 14, 2017, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-one/776577/953 "2017-01-14T05:46:32Z")
> [@Drain\_Bead](#): > > Moving on, the next vote for **septimus** was two posts after his “soft claim,” in 347. > > Speaking of weak vote, this one’s pretty weak to me. First off, reasonable minds may disagree on just how weak the vote for **Colby** is. He’s been the consistent lynch leader all Day for a potential slip, which is probably more than most early Day One votes have to go on (I’m already on record as disagreeing about the nature of most of these types of “slips”, but I can see the other side of that argument and don’t have a problem with it). The unvote was for weaker reasons than the vote, for sure, but I don’t necessarily think that the vote itself was weak. I did see the soft claim before voting, but are you saying that a soft claim is enough to unvote (or not vote)? A soft claim can’t be tested or countered. If all scum have to do to escape the noose is suggest that they are a town power, then we are not going to get very far. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-one/776577)._