# Mafia Reunion - Day Three **URL:** \ **Category:** Thread Games\ **Created:** [January 24, 2017, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-three/778068 "2017-01-24T20:43:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 183
**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\ **Post date:** [January 25, 2017, 8:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-three/778068/183 "2017-01-25T20:31:22Z")
> [@LightFoot](#): > > > [@Pleonast](#): > > > > **Thing Fish** said “It reads to me like you could be scum advising your teammates on how to play and/or hinting to them that you are that seventh guy who didn’t show up to chat”. That implicitly states that Scum do not learn the identity of all their teammates on their secret board. Otherwise, why would a Scum player need to hint they were the seventh guy who didn’t show up to chat? > > > > Only a player who has read a secret board would know it doesn’t reveal all their teammates. It’s not stated anywhere in the rules. Thus, **Thing Fish** has revealed they’ve read a Scum secret board, and so must be Scum. This is a slam-dunk case of perfect information slippage. > > > > Of course I started the conversation! That’s the whole point of discussing Scum–so that they inadvertently make mistakes when discussing themselves. > > He was talking about what You said.YOU Yes, **Thing Fish** was talking about what I said, but gave information that I did not. Information that only someone who’s been reading a Scum board would know. > [@LightFoot](#): > > Not down play but if they did things AFTER that one post D1 that you find suspect- explain away. If not then you are discounting the rest of the Days. I’m not discounting anything. I am making my cases based on Day One reads. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-three/778068)._