# Mafia Reunion - Day Two

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425>\
**Category:** Thread Games\
**Created:** [January 17, 2017, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425 "2017-01-17T22:20:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 230

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DiggitCamara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/df788c/32.png) [@DiggitCamara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DiggitCamara)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2017, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425/230 "2017-01-19T16:11:21Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_Bravo](#):
>
> (snip)
> 
> \*\*Diggit:
> 
> \*\*Vote: #249. Admits that it’s a weak vote, mirrors the same stuff about the “other team” slip.
> 
> Unvote: #264. Diggit takes offense at Snfaulkner’s defense of Colby. But the defense, as we know now, was legit. He says “defense of another player is usually given whenever the culprit actually has superior information about the other player.” That holds a lot more truth when there’s only one scum team. NOBODY in this game knows who is actually town except for the Masons. Weak switch.
> 
> (snip)

Counter: this is very weak analysis, actually. The fact that scum doesn’t have perfect information doesn’t preclude a weak defense of everyone who ISN’T on their team. It would be interesting if, while doing so, they would by chance vote for someone on the opposing team.

But still, this defense pings me. Not enough to change my

**vote for snfaulkner**

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425)._