# Mafia Reunion - Day Two **URL:** \ **Category:** Thread Games\ **Created:** [January 17, 2017, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425 "2017-01-17T22:20:08Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 61
**Author:** ![Captain\_Klutz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/captain_klutz/32/4993_2.png) [@Captain\_Klutz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Klutz)\ **Post date:** [January 18, 2017, 5:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425/61 "2017-01-18T05:49:35Z")
> [@Drain\_Bead](#): > > Reiterating my one-off vote from yesterDay. > > \*\* vote Captain Klutz\*\* > > I really think his vote timing on septimus was such that he realized he was voting for a Town power role when he did it, because it came an hour and a half after septimus mentioned that he wouldn’t be around at EoD and would need to claim early if still a lynch leader. Seems like something Scum would try to take advantage of. This ws my reply to your original vote on Day 1: > [@Mafia Reunion - Day One](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-one/776577/953): > > I did see the soft claim before voting, but are you saying that a soft claim is enough to unvote (or not vote)? A soft claim can’t be tested or countered. If all scum have to do to escape the noose is suggest that they are a town power, then we are not going to get very far. You did not respond to this. I’ll ask you again: does a soft claim mean that you would never vote for that person? --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425)._