# Mafia Reunion - Day Two

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425>\
**Category:** Thread Games\
**Created:** [January 17, 2017, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425 "2017-01-17T22:20:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 982

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lakai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/9de0a6/32.png) [@Lakai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lakai)\
**Post date:** [January 22, 2017, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425/982 "2017-01-22T15:31:40Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Klutz](#):
>
> I think that **brewha** is a terrible lynch for toDay. While “lynch all liars” is the best of the policy votes, it is not absolute. In this case he lied to conceal that he held a switch. That is not a totally unreasonable thing to do, but it has backfired rather badly.

I’m voting **brewha** because I don’t like his explanation for the lie. I don’t believe it was a mistake to lie like that. It was a deliberate lie for some reason and because \*\*brewha \*\*is claiming it’s a mistake I think he is trying to cover up the reason.

Why do you think it was not totally unreasonable for **brewha** to lie?

I was suspicious for \*\*Crys \*\*because she claimed to save **brewha** for very odd reasons, which she now claims was a mistake. I believe it was a mistake because I can’t think of any other scenario where a claim to save \*\*brewha \*\*would make sense.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mafia-reunion-day-two/777425)._
