# Magnets

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 23, 2011, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708 "2011-01-23T22:54:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/1 "2011-01-23T22:54:22Z")

</div>

Is it possible for a magnet to have only one pole? Or greater than two?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OldGuy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/3bc359/32.png) [@OldGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/OldGuy)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/2 "2011-01-23T23:01:51Z")

</div>

Magnetic monopoles exist according to some theories, but none have ever been found.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/3 "2011-01-23T23:04:00Z")

</div>

How the \*\*\*\* do they work?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![x-ray\_vision](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/x-ray_vision/32/351_2.png) [@x-ray\_vision](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/x-ray_vision)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 11:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/4 "2011-01-23T23:09:45Z")

</div>

> **[Magnetic monopoles](https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=100304)**
>
> Magnets have a south and a north pole. Are there any physical theories that predict magnetic monopoles ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/5 "2011-01-23T23:38:17Z")

</div>

I like the way my old advisor put it: “Magnetic monopoles certainly exist. But the number of them in the Universe might be very small, possibly zero”.

That is to say, the laws of physics allow for the existence of monopoles, and current theories predict that under the right conditions, one (well, two) could be made. But the right conditions are very extreme, and it’s likely that they have never occurred, or that if they have, it was before inflation scattered them extremely far and wide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2011, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/6 "2011-01-23T23:46:20Z")

</div>

Oh, and the linked thread (which I didn’t see at the time, or I would have replied there) states that there is no observational evidence for monopoles. This isn’t quite correct: On February 14, 1982, an experiment set up by Stanford did in fact detect something which certainly seemed to have been a monopole. The detection has never been repeated, though, and nobody’s really sure what caused it, whether it was a genuine monopole that we were just lucky enough to detect, a weird quirky glitch in the apparatus that nobody’s yet explained, or an extremely elaborate hoax to which nobody has yet confessed. So it’s not _strong_ evidence, but it’s still evidence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Napier](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ce73a5/32.png) [@Napier](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Napier)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/7 "2011-01-24T00:26:51Z")

</div>

You can certainly have more than two poles on a magnet. Stepper motor cores can have hundreds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/8 "2011-01-24T01:37:17Z")

</div>

True, but those are each still one of the familiar two kinds of poles. It’s not like you introduce an east pole and a west pole, or anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/9 "2011-01-24T01:42:24Z")

</div>

If I allowed a monopole to stick to a conventional magnet, what would happen? Diminished field strength at that pole, but not the other one?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 3:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/10 "2011-01-24T03:17:52Z")

</div>

Probably.

Incidentally, this is part of the reason that you can’t get permanent electric dipoles, like you can with magnets: Free charges would accumulate at the poles and neutralize it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nametag](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nametag/32/406_2.png) [@Nametag](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nametag)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/11 "2011-01-24T03:28:43Z")

</div>

[Electrets](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret) are pretty close. Some molecules are permanent dipoles (like water).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/12 "2011-01-24T03:33:07Z")

</div>

True, I should have said “hard to get”, not “can’t get”. And I was leaving implicit that I meant on a macroscopic scale.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JWT\_Kottekoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3ec8ea/32.png) [@JWT\_Kottekoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JWT_Kottekoe)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 4:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/13 "2011-01-24T04:09:05Z")

</div>

The Valentine’s day monopole was certainly not a hoax. The PI is a very highly respected physicist. They saw a flux jump in a superconducting loop. This is exactly what would happen if a monopole traversed the loop. Decades earlier, P.A.M. Dirac had predicted the existence of monopoles with a specific charge. The amplitude of the 1982 event was just what was expected for a “Dirac” monopole.

There are many things that can cause flux jumps in superconducting loops. The event was tantalizing, especially since the amplitude was the right size, but it was always a leap of faith to accept this single event as a monopole.

An earlier monopole “discovery” was made by Buford Price in a cosmic ray experiment. Luis Alvarez gave a pretty convincing argument that the event could be more easily explained in a conventional way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wbeaty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/439d5e/32.png) [@wbeaty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wbeaty)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 8:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/14 "2011-01-24T08:33:28Z")

</div>

If you have a classroom bar magnet, you can use a small Neo magnet to change its polarity.

Re-magnetize it so it has N poles at the two ends, and a big fuzzy S pole in the center.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/15 "2011-01-24T21:18:04Z")

</div>

Quoth **JWT Kottekoe** :

> [@](#):
>
> The Valentine’s day monopole was certainly not a hoax. The PI is a very highly respected physicist.

I didn’t say it was (or even might have been) a hoax _by the PI_. But for any given experiment (even a relatively simple one like this), there are always going to be many people involved in it, and many more who aren’t directly involved in it but who would have potentially had access to it. If it were a hoax, it could have been a grad student in the next lab over, whose keys open both lab rooms, for instance. Or an undergrad who talked the janitor into opening the door for them, or whatever.

And while there are many things that could cause a flux jump in a superconducting loop, are there any that could have caused a one-way jump, that didn’t jump back down?

Quoth **wbeaty** :

> [@](#):
>
> If you have a classroom bar magnet, you can use a small Neo magnet to change its polarity.
> 
> Re-magnetize it so it has N poles at the two ends, and a big fuzzy S pole in the center.

This is certainly possible (it’s called a linear quadrupole), but it’d probably be on the difficult side, in practice (and probably easier to do with electromagnets than with a fixed magnet). It’ll also weaken the magnet in the middle, since the souths will be trying to repel each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/16 "2011-01-24T22:33:14Z")

</div>

So if a monopole existed, would those lines of force used for illustration just reach out into the universe towards the nearest opposite pole?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gazpacho](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6f9a4e/32.png) [@gazpacho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gazpacho)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/17 "2011-01-24T22:41:28Z")

</div>

I was under the impression that all magnetic effects could be explained with moving changes and taking relativity into account. Am I mistaken?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 24, 2011, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/18 "2011-01-24T22:49:01Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> So if a monopole existed, would those lines of force used for illustration just reach out into the universe towards the nearest opposite pole?

The lines of field (which should not be called lines of force) of a monopole would behave in the same manner as those of an electric charge: Radiating out uniformly in all directions near the source (i.e., much closer to the source than to other monopoles), eventually veering in to converge on another monopole or monopoles of the opposite charge.

> [@](#):
>
> I was under the impression that all magnetic effects could be explained with moving changes and taking relativity into account. Am I mistaken?

All magnetic effects _which have been repeatably observed_ can be explained in that way. The situation gets more complicated if there are monopoles (which, for practical purposes, have not been observed).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gazpacho](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6f9a4e/32.png) [@gazpacho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gazpacho)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2011, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/19 "2011-01-25T01:07:27Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> All magnetic effects _which have been repeatably observed_ can be explained in that way. The situation gets more complicated if there are monopoles (which, for practical purposes, have not been observed).

Doesn’t that make the whole idea of magnetic monopoles something left over from an older less complete understanding of electricity and magnetism. Sort of like looking for the crystal spheres that controlled the movement of the planets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JWT\_Kottekoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3ec8ea/32.png) [@JWT\_Kottekoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JWT_Kottekoe)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2011, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708/20 "2011-01-25T02:50:42Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> And while there are many things that could cause a flux jump in a superconducting loop, are there any that could have caused a one-way jump, that didn’t jump back down?

Yes, most practical superconductors are type II, meaning that the magnetic flux penetrates the superconductors. The flux vortices are pinned in place, but the pinning forces can be small and a tiny disturbance can cause flux to move.

I favor a different explanation: I would guess that the current in the loop was read out with a SQUID (superconducting quantum interference device). The response of a SQUID is periodic and is usually linearized by feedback. The feedback loop will have a maximum slew rate. If a transient exceeds the slew rate, the feedback will momentarily lose lock and will restabilize at a value offset by an integral number of flux quanta in the readout circuit. The signal will appear as a sudden flux jump, just as if a monopole had passed through the loop. It would take a coincidence for the magnitude of the jump to be correct for a Dirac monopole.

P.S. Sorry I misinterpreted your comment about a possible hoax.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/magnets/568708.md?page=2)
