Would the SS step in and stop her if she was smoking something more dangerous than just the weed? What if she was smoking the methamphetamines?
I presume everyone who seeks to approach her is subjected to some kind of risk assessment, which factors in the characteristics of the person approaching her and the nature and context of the approach.
The options open to the SS are not a simple binary between doing nothing, and prevent the approach by every measure up to and including lethal force. People with SS protection don’t live in a bubble; they are routinely approached by those who have business with them, and that could certainly include an LEO. The SS are more likely to monitor and regulate such an approach than prevent it outright, I would have thought.
In the eyes of (federal) law, those are both the same, and in some cases (say, she was ‘smoking’ Rx ampheatmines, it would actually be less illegal than smoking pot. At that point, you’re getting into judgement calls and possibly stepping on some parenting toes. Don’t get me wrong, if they saw her shooting up (heroin), yes, I could see them stopping her, but I’m really not sure what the answer is. I wonder if there’s a protocol here. There might be, seems like there is for everything else.
So, you’re saying they do an ocular pat down?
Wait… are you saying that Jill Smith was also smoking pot at Lollapalooza? Holy crap; that is news! Was she with Malia Obama?
More people that put their pants on ,just like the rest of us, who cares.
I’m saying they make a judgment about whether and how to intervene.
Worked out well for The Gang.
Well, I hope theirs work more like Country Mac’s ocular pat downs than City Mac’s.
I’m curious – does this new Chicago law actually forbid smoking by those who are 18-20 as well, or just furnishing them tobacco inside the city? I couldn’t tell from the articles I read.