# Man of Steel is going to rock your freaking socks off

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [April 11, 2013, 5:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382 "2013-04-11T05:52:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 5:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/81 "2013-04-13T17:41:21Z")

</div>

> [@drastic\_quench](#):
>
> That’s a false dilemma. The film can be thematically darker while Superman keeps his moral code. In fact, his goodness resonates more when he’s part of a darker, more cynical world.

Agreed. Have you seen the animated Superman vs. The Elite? Yes, it’s aimed at kids, but this is the exact point it makes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/82 "2013-04-13T17:47:54Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> It would be difficult for a lot of casual moviegoers to take “Brainiac” seriously. I tried reading Kevin Smith’s proposed Superman script, and I was laughing at parts that were not meant to be taken as funny.
> 
> If they’re going to reboot the franchise, the two most logical foes for Superman are the same ones from the first go at this; Lex Luthor and Zod. Zod is an interesting foes because he abilities are the same as Superman’s. Luthor’s an interesting foe because his abilities are precisely NOT Superman’s.

When I think of Brainiac, I think of alien sentient android with extremely advanced technology, capable of telepathy and mind control, and multiple bodies subject to a central intelligence far away from danger, and not just some green dude that puts cities in bottles. With a good script (of course) I see him as a bigger, more interesting threat than Luthor. Zod is merely an evil version of Superman. We’ve already had evil versions of Spider-Man, Hulk and Iron Man recently: I favor a little variety.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Justin\_Bailey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/justin_bailey/32/8792_2.png) [@Justin\_Bailey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Justin_Bailey)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/83 "2013-04-13T17:51:50Z")

</div>

> [@bienville](#):
>
> If the canon from the first movie is changed, the second movie ain’t part of the same series.  
> [Besides which, no one involved with the second film considers it a sequel to the first.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incredible_Hulk_(film)#Development)

ProTip: When looking for a quote from the creator to prove someone wrong about a piece of media, don’t use a quote that proves me right.

“It’s kind of a reboot and it’s kind of sequel” supports my argument, not yours.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 5:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/84 "2013-04-13T17:56:15Z")

</div>

> [@Justin\_Bailey](#):
>
> This is wrong. The Incredible Hulk is a sequel to Hulk the same way Evil Dead 2 is a sequel to Evil Dead. The canon of what actually happened in the first movie is slightly changed, but the first movie still happened.
> 
> Hulk ends with Banner running to South America and The Incredible Hulk opens with Hulk hiding in South America.

> [@bienville](#):
>
> If the canon from the first movie is changed, the second movie ain’t part of the same series.  
> [Besides which, no one involved with the second film considers it a sequel to the first.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incredible_Hulk_(film)#Development)

Why do you both (and some others) keep talking about a movie that doesn’t exist because it was never made and even if it had been made it would have been destroyed, utterly and completely, so that history would not have such an abhorrent blemish?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Justin\_Bailey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/justin_bailey/32/8792_2.png) [@Justin\_Bailey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Justin_Bailey)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/85 "2013-04-13T18:02:19Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> Why do you both (and some others) keep talking about a movie that doesn’t exist because it was never made and even if it had been made it would have been destroyed, utterly and completely, so that history would not have such an abhorrent blemish?

Are you talking about Hulk or The Incredible Hulk? Because one was much better than I was expecting and one was complete and total trash.

And anyone who doesn’t know which is which shouldn’t be participating in a discussion about comic book movies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bienville](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/4bbf92/32.png) [@bienville](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bienville)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/86 "2013-04-13T18:21:41Z")

</div>

> [@Justin\_Bailey](#):
>
> ProTip: When looking for a quote from the creator to prove someone wrong about a piece of media, don’t use a quote that proves me right.
> 
> “It’s kind of a reboot and it’s kind of sequel” supports my argument, not yours.

If it was a sequel, the answer to the question would have been simple: “It’s a sequel.”  
There’d be no hemming and hawing or creation of portmanteau or “crap, we don’t want people to think there’s no need to buy the DVD of the other film.”

If the second was a sequel to the first then they’d either both be counted in the [Marvel Cinematic Universe](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvel_Cinematic_Universe) or neither would be counted.  
One is counted, the other is not. They’re not part of the same fictional universe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b2d939/32.png) [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/C_K_Dexter_Haven)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 7:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/87 "2013-04-13T19:53:57Z")

</div>

> [@drastic\_quench](#):
>
> That’s a false dilemma. The film can be thematically darker while Superman keeps his moral code. In fact, his goodness resonates more when he’s part of a darker, more cynical world.

A darker, more cynical world, that I got no problem with. A darker, more cynical Superman, that’s what I’m fretting. Batman can brood. Batman wants to bring fear to evil-doers. Batman is a creature of the night. A darker, nastier Batman, that’s fine.

Superman isn’t out to bring fear, but truth and justice. A morose, nasty Superman, that’s not fine. Not to me. An indecisive Clark Kent, facing prospective futures, that’s different from “dark” or "cynical.’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cayuga](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@Cayuga](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cayuga)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/88 "2013-04-13T21:10:38Z")

</div>

Wait? Superman without the spit curl? This movie is gonna suck.  
Sadly, I’m a little not-joking. Plus I HATE the rubber uniform.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![randwill](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a3d4f5/32.png) [@randwill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/randwill)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 9:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/89 "2013-04-13T21:11:21Z")

</div>

A few things from this week’s Entertainment Weekly article. Amy Adams’ Lois Lane will be blond. Laurence Fishburn’s Perry White will be black, presumably. Most interesting to me is the rational for the skin-tight costume. It is a customary Kryptonian garment meant to be worn under battle armor. Supes just doesn’t have the armor which is meant to be attached to it.

Most interesting, and possibly Spoiler territory:

On Krypton, children are genetically engineered test tube babies rather than being born in the conventional way, except for you-know-who.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AClockworkMelon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aclockworkmelon/32/10803_2.png) [@AClockworkMelon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AClockworkMelon)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/90 "2013-04-13T21:28:58Z")

</div>

> [@randwill](#):
>
> A few things from this week’s Entertainment Weekly article. Amy Adams’ Lois Lane will be blond. Laurence Fishburn’s Perry White will be black, presumably. Most interesting to me is the rational for the skin-tight costume. It is a customary Kryptonian garment meant to be worn under battle armor. Supes just doesn’t have the armor which is meant to be attached to it.
> 
> Most interesting, and possibly Spoiler territory:
> 
> On Krypton, children are genetically engineered test tube babies rather than being born in the conventional way, except for you-know-who.

Why does his traditional Kryptonian undergarment have an S on it?

I’m legitimately curious to know if the writers have come up for some crazy reason for it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![planetcory](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/planetcory/32/1032_2.png) [@planetcory](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/planetcory)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2013, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/91 "2013-04-13T21:56:08Z")

</div>

> [@AClockworkMelon](#):
>
> Why does his traditional Kryptonian undergarment have an S on it?
> 
> I’m legitimately curious to know if the writers have come up for some crazy reason for it.

They’re likely going to use the same reason they used in the first movie. It’s actually a Kryptonian symbol that resembles an S. Kind of a family crest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![planetcory](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/planetcory/32/1032_2.png) [@planetcory](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/planetcory)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/92 "2013-04-15T14:47:46Z")

</div>

They’re starting to ramp up on the viral stuff.

Zod is coming: [YOU ARE NOT ALONE - YouTube](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6g2ZSuWyM4)

Soon: [http://www.iwillfindhim.com/](http://www.iwillfindhim.com/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gagundathar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a183cd/32.png) [@Gagundathar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gagundathar)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/93 "2013-04-15T15:22:02Z")

</div>

My goodness, that is intriguing.  
I am not a fan-boy for Kal-El, but this made me really interested.  
Wouldn’t it be truly great the movie turns out to not be a disappointment?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/94 "2013-04-15T15:27:11Z")

</div>

> [@AClockworkMelon](#):
>
> Why does his traditional Kryptonian undergarment have an S on it?
> 
> I’m legitimately curious to know if the writers have come up for some crazy reason for it.

I don’t know if this is the moviemakers’ take on it, but for a number of years now in the comics, the “S” is actually the symbol for the House of El (Kal-El, Jor-El, Whatthe-El).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pancakes3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ba9def/32.png) [@pancakes3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pancakes3)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/95 "2013-04-15T15:55:51Z")

</div>

> [@C\_K\_Dexter\_Haven](#):
>
> A darker, more cynical world, that I got no problem with. A darker, more cynical Superman, that’s what I’m fretting. Batman can brood. Batman wants to bring fear to evil-doers. Batman is a creature of the night. A darker, nastier Batman, that’s fine.
> 
> Superman isn’t out to bring fear, but truth and justice. A morose, nasty Superman, that’s not fine. Not to me. An indecisive Clark Kent, facing prospective futures, that’s different from “dark” or "cynical.’

I’m not a fan of the trend of gritty reboots either, ranging from Daniel Craig’s James Bond to all of the fairy tale story reboots.

However, I think Superman would be a good candidate for a gritty reboot, especially with his ambiguous origin story - the part from when he crashes to when he shows up in metropolis. Disclaimer: I didn’t read the comics, nor did I watch Smallville.

Plus Superman is a little too bland compared to other heroes. He has just as much angst, internal conflict, and inklings of alienation as anyone else - perhaps moreso. It’d be nice to see this on the big screen. I think Superman returns wanted to touch on that but it was just terribly executed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pancakes3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/ba9def/32.png) [@pancakes3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pancakes3)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/96 "2013-04-15T16:04:24Z")

</div>

> [@planetcory](#):
>
> They’re starting to ramp up on the viral stuff.
> 
> Zod is coming: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6g2ZSuWyM4](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6g2ZSuWyM4)
> 
> Soon: [http://www.iwillfindhim.com/](http://www.iwillfindhim.com/)

This is slightly disappointing.

I was hoping for more internal strife rather than a 3rd party maniac making the hero choose between himself and the world. We’ve seen that song and dance 3 times over in the Dark Knight movies for a cumulative of 9-10 hrs. Iron Man 3 looks to follow that formula too.

I was really hoping for old-school spidey-type conflict of what the alter ego wants vs what the hero is expected to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aquadementia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aquadementia/32/555_2.png) [@Aquadementia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aquadementia)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 4:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/97 "2013-04-15T16:21:39Z")

</div>

> [@Sitnam](#):
>
> Ok, the man is over worked. I think _you_ are missing the point. A hero is someone people aspire to be. A person who sacrifices and dares to great things.
> 
> Superman can’t be hurt and he can travel in space at will because he was born capable of doing it. How is he a hero? What has he achieved in spite of adversity though sheer force of will to be admired? Fuck admired, what has he achieved to make him worthy of being a protagonist in any good story?
> 
> Country bumpkin born capable of picking up cars falls in love with a Metropolis journalist, that is not a good story.

It might look that way because he always wins and his power level is through the roof. What you’re ignoring is all the beatings he has to take and that he’s the ultimate target for any mad scientist with a grudge or super alien.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gagundathar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a183cd/32.png) [@Gagundathar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gagundathar)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/98 "2013-04-15T16:22:22Z")

</div>

I suppose the idea of SUPERMAN (you know, the invulnerable guy, bastion of things good), might be sought as a fugitive from justice is rather compelling. Not just a physical threat but an essential threat to what him… him. Whoever, ‘him’ is. I always think of him as Kal-El. But, I am after all, a geek.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Scud](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/f08c70/32.png) [@Tom\_Scud](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Scud)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/99 "2013-04-15T16:25:14Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> It would be difficult for a lot of casual moviegoers to take “Brainiac” seriously. I tried reading Kevin Smith’s proposed Superman script, and I was laughing at parts that were not meant to be taken as funny.

> [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](#):
>
> When I think of Brainiac, I think of alien sentient android with extremely advanced technology, capable of telepathy and mind control, and multiple bodies subject to a central intelligence far away from danger, and not just some green dude that puts cities in bottles.

I think Rick’s just referring to the name; the character could work but I agree that the name is just not workable nowadays.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CandidGamera](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/candidgamera/32/2878_2.png) [@CandidGamera](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CandidGamera)\
**Post date:** [April 15, 2013, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382/100 "2013-04-15T17:10:48Z")

</div>

> [@pancakes3](#):
>
> I was really hoping for old-school spidey-type conflict of what the alter ego wants vs what the hero is expected to do.

Please, for the love of God, no. I have had enough of the whiny, conflicted school of super-“heroes”.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/man-of-steel-is-going-to-rock-your-freaking-socks-off/655382.md?page=6)
