Naita, I was reading, and smilin’ with, Al capp when he was making fun of politicians. I had lost interest by Vietnam. Al was no longer funny, to me. In fact (don’t have a cite) our involvement in Vietnam probably marked the start of his slide toward irrelevance.
I was hoping for the naming of contemporary funnypersons, influenced by and cracking wise on the conditions that prevail today.
Dang, ran afoul of the five-minute edit limit. I’m slow on the keyboard, but now I’m getting a complex. I meant to add:
And Bryan, if Al seemed to be going after non-humerous lefties, it may have been because they were lefties, rather than their funny quotient.
Part of a humorist’s job description is to exaggerate, you know? I say that today’s liberal comedians have it hard; how could you exaggerate today’s newsfeeds? You just repeat them, and you can hold the smirkies.
The only reason I brought it up is that I remember Capp specifically calling his targets humorless in the book’s introduction, though I don’t know where my copy is and I can’t get you a specific quote at the moment.
Nevermind, Bryan - I find Al a perfectly believable source for what Al believed. As I recall, his humor was built on a pretty rough parodying of rubes, hicks, and hillbillies, stuff that would be considered very non-PC today, not least by the targets themselves.
Twain was very good at spotting the hypocrisy and illogic in other people’s beliefs. That doesn’t mean that he had a consistent set of beliefs of his own. Seeing the inconsistencies in some well-known religion/philosophy/science/whatever is fine, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that you have your own carefully thought out religion/philosophy/science/whatever. Twain is a great writer, but it’s hard to put together a single set of beliefs from his writings. Here’s some links to some comments on and collections of his writings about religion et al.: