# Martin/Zimmerman: humble opinions and speculation thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [April 18, 2012, 4:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125 "2012-04-18T04:41:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 619

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jack\_Batty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jack_batty/32/3201_2.png) [@Jack\_Batty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jack_Batty)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12364 "2013-07-12T14:23:24Z")

</div>

Isn’t it amazing: If Zimmerman forgot he had his gun with him, it’s proof that he had no intent to do any harm; on the other hand, if Zimmerman did know he had his gun with him, it’s proof that he had no intent to do any harm.

It’s like the perfect defense!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12365 "2013-07-12T14:24:13Z")

</div>

> [@Zyanthia](#):
>
> Yes 🙂 That’s why I preceded with IMO, which I thought was in my opinion. If I were writing laws, I would definitely push for something that makes him responsible.

So…say I realize that I can’t find my shotgun. I search the whole house. Turns out it was locked in my safe the whole time, but for seven minutes, I didn’t know where it was.

I should go to prison for that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12366 "2013-07-12T14:27:22Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> Isn’t it amazing: If Zimmerman forgot he had his gun with him, it’s proof that he had no intent to do any harm; on the other hand, if Zimmerman did know he had his gun with him, it’s proof that he had not intent to do any harm.
> 
> It’s like the perfect defense!

Where’d you get that? It’s just not a claim that requires being “incredibly gullible” to find plausible, if you’ve actually carried a pistol and thus might know what you’re talking about.

Zimmerman firing when he did is evidence that he showed restraint, which could have resulted from forgetting he had his pistol, or a conscious decision on his part. There’s no way to know which it was.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12367 "2013-07-12T14:29:13Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> Isn’t it amazing: If Zimmerman forgot he had his gun with him, it’s proof that he had no intent to do any harm; on the other hand, if Zimmerman did know he had his gun with him, it’s proof that he had no intent to do any harm.
> 
> It’s like the perfect defense!

No, actually it’s like: If Zimmerman forgot he had his gun with him, then he is guilty of murder, whereas if he didn’t forget he had his gun with him, then he is guilty of murder.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jack\_Batty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jack_batty/32/3201_2.png) [@Jack\_Batty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jack_Batty)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12368 "2013-07-12T14:31:04Z")

</div>

Actually it’s more like this: if Zimmerman said he forgot he had his gun with him, then he’s fucking lying, because he never would have gotten out of his truck to chase down one of the asshole fucking punks who always get away with out it in the first place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12369 "2013-07-12T14:36:45Z")

</div>

Actually, just to close this off: Anything Zimmerman says is a lie, because he is a murderer. We know he is a murderer because everything he says is a lie.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12370 "2013-07-12T14:39:29Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> Actually it’s more like this: if Zimmerman said he forgot he had his gun with him, then he’s fucking lying, because he never would have gotten out of his truck to chase down one of the asshole fucking punks who always get away with out it in the first place.

Your psychological profile aside, if Zimmerman were so determined to stop Martin from getting away, why would he stop running and take a couple minutes to talk to the NEN dispatcher? That’s ample time for the asshole punk to escape.

If he anticipated capturing the asshole punk, why not draw his pistol first? A Kel-Tec 9mm is a lot more persuasive than a 5’ 7.5" 200 pound man.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jack\_Batty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jack_batty/32/3201_2.png) [@Jack\_Batty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jack_Batty)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12371 "2013-07-12T14:48:45Z")

</div>

You tell me. You’re the tough guy who’s always packing.

All I know is that if you’re walking through Walmart shopping for some lard-covered butterballs or whatever, you may not be paying much attention to the problem solver you’re hiding on your person. But if you just spotted a drugged out maniac walking through your neighborhood, you’re going to know what you’re bringing to the patrol area. Don’t try to convince me otherwise, Serpico.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zyanthia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Zyanthia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zyanthia)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12372 "2013-07-12T14:49:07Z")

</div>

> [@Human\_Action](#):
>
> So…say I realize that I can’t find my shotgun. I search the whole house. Turns out it was locked in my safe the whole time, but for seven minutes, I didn’t know where it was.
> 
> I should go to prison for that?

I know I didn’t spell out all the specifics in my earlier proposal, so I do apologize for my ambiguity.

If I were to write it in better (probably not in full but hopefully enough to get the gist):

[QUOTE= In my opinion what a Law might look like (not really in legal terms though)]

The owner of a firearm is responsible for the safe disposition of their firearm at all times. If an owner fails to keep track of said firearm and does not report it as stolen and the firearm is used in the commission of a crime, the penalty is punishable by:  
If damage to property = Fine  
If injury to livestock = Fine  
If injury to people = Fine, community service  
If death to people = Fine, revocation of license for a period for not less than 1 year. After 1 year, owner may complete a gun safety course to reattain license.

[/QUOTE]

This isn’t punishment for the crime that was committed, this is punishment for not being responsible with your weapon, which allowed it to be used in a crime.

And I don’t really want people who have stuff stolen from them held responsible for what was stolen.

But if you are careless with the gun, or forget where it is, and something happens, yes you should face punishment. In my opinion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DragonAsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/db5fbb/32.png) [@DragonAsh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DragonAsh)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12373 "2013-07-12T14:55:24Z")

</div>

Let’s see - you’re the neighborhood watch captain. You carry your gun around with you 24/7 (didn’t he say he almost always had his gun on him?) You’re tracking a real suspicious guy, you think he’s up to no good, you think he’s possibly on drugs, possibly armed, and you got out of your car to follow him.

Do you really think he’d ‘forget’ he was armed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12374 "2013-07-12T14:58:23Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> You tell me. You’re the tough guy who’s always packing.

Eh, I’m medium-tough at best. You flatter me.

The point should be clear: Zimmerman’s actions are not consistent a refusal to let Martin escape: he stopped for several minutes, during which time Martin would be long, long gone if he was a the burgler Zimmerman suspect him to be.

His actions are not consistent with an attempt to capture Martin: his pistol was holstered, if it was not, then Martin either wouldn’t have punched Zimmerman at all, or there’d be bruises and scratches on Zimmerman’s hands from a struggle for the gun.

His actions are not consistent with a desire to kill Martin: he didn’t fire until about 30-40 seconds into a fight where he was losing badly, and he fired only one.

Those facts eliminate second-degree murder all on their own, though not manslaughter.

> [@Jack Batty](#):
>
> All I know is that if you’re walking through Walmart shopping for some lard-covered butterballs or whatever, you may not be paying much attention to the problem solver you’re hiding on your person. But if you just spotted a drugged out maniac walking through your neighborhood, you’re going to know what you’re bringing to the patrol area.

I’d say it’s more likely to be the reverse, that you’d forget information, even important facts like “my gun is on my hip”, during a time of stress, and novel stress at that, rather than a tranquil afternoon’s shopping.

> [@Jack Batty](#):
>
> Don’t try to convince me otherwise, Serpico.

I concluded some time ago that you were immune to contrary reasoning, but I try anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 2:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12375 "2013-07-12T14:59:55Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> All I know is that if you’re walking through Walmart shopping for some lard-covered butterballs or whatever, you may not be paying much attention to the problem solver you’re hiding on your person.

Zimmerman was on his way to Target, not Wal-Mart. But it is good to know that you now understand why Zimmerman would not have immediately remembered that he had the pistol with him.

> [@](#):
>
> Don’t try to convince me otherwise, Serpico.

That apparently isn’t going to work - all we have to convince you are facts and logic.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12376 "2013-07-12T15:02:09Z")

</div>

> [@Zyanthia](#):
>
> I know I didn’t spell out all the specifics in my earlier proposal, so I do apologize for my ambiguity.
> 
> If I were to write it in better (probably not in full but hopefully enough to get the gist):
> 
> This isn’t punishment for the crime that was committed, this is punishment for not being responsible with your weapon, which allowed it to be used in a crime.
> 
> And I don’t really want people who have stuff stolen from them held responsible for what was stolen.
> 
> But if you are careless with the gun, or forget where it is, and something happens, yes you should face punishment. In my opinion.

Ok, I understand your reasoning. Some areas do have laws similar to that, though the owner’s reasonable efforts at securing the weapon, such as a gun safe, are generally a defense: you’re not liable if someone breaks open your safe, as you did all you reasonably could to prevent the theft of the gun.

I’m confused as to how this would apply to Zimmerman, though. His gun wasn’t lost or stolen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12377 "2013-07-12T15:04:06Z")

</div>

> [@DragonAsh](#):
>
> Let’s see - you’re the neighborhood watch captain. You carry your gun around with you 24/7 (didn’t he say he almost always had his gun on him?) You’re tracking a real suspicious guy, you think he’s up to no good, you think he’s possibly on drugs, possibly armed, and you got out of your car to follow him.
> 
> Do you really think he’d ‘forget’ he was armed?

It’s certainly possible, yes, be it from the gun being so routine as to be below conscious thought, or from stress affecting cognition. I don’t understand the mortal certainly from some posters that it’s not.

Do you carry a concealed firearm?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12378 "2013-07-12T15:08:08Z")

</div>

Gah, about two dozen typos in that post. Sorry, **Jack Batty** , some days I’m borderline illiterate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12379 "2013-07-12T15:12:10Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> I’ve tried to explain why it’s immoral and cowardly to provoke a fist fight while carrying a concealed handgun you’re willing to use.

When you talk about a fight, and you call one party immoral and cowardly and (even though you think the other party is) omit calling the other party immoral and cowardly, your biases are showing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steophan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steophan/32/9595_2.png) [@Steophan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steophan)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12380 "2013-07-12T15:12:31Z")

</div>

> [@Jack\_Batty](#):
>
> Actually it’s more like this: if Zimmerman said he forgot he had his gun with him, then he’s fucking lying, because he never would have gotten out of his truck to chase down one of the asshole fucking punks who always get away with out it in the first place.

So, as Zimmerman did not, in fact, chase down anyone, does that prove he’s not lying?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tollhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e99b99/32.png) [@Tollhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tollhouse)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12381 "2013-07-12T15:19:36Z")

</div>

> [@Human\_Action](#):
>
> Where’d you get that? It’s just not a claim that requires being “incredibly gullible” to find plausible, if you’ve actually carried a pistol and thus might know what you’re talking about.
> 
> Zimmerman firing when he did is evidence that he showed restraint, which could have resulted from forgetting he had his pistol, or a conscious decision on his part. There’s no way to know which it was.

Still wanting everything both ways, I see

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zyanthia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Zyanthia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zyanthia)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12382 "2013-07-12T15:19:46Z")

</div>

> [@Human\_Action](#):
>
> I’m confused as to how this would apply to Zimmerman, though. His gun wasn’t lost or stolen.

Well, Zimmerman claims he forgot where the gun was. That means the gun wasn’t at the scene on purpose. Zimmerman didn’t bring it there intentionally, it was there because Zimmerman forgot where it was.

Now since Zimmerman didn’t realize the gun was at the scene, he didn’t think twice about getting into an altercation. What’s the worst that can happen?

Suddenly Trayvon sees the gun and Zimmerman is like, “Oh shit, I bit off more than I can chew!”

If Zimmerman had secured the gun before engaging Trayvon, the shooting couldn’t have happened.

I know it’s all speculation, and I’m not saying carrying the gun was wrong, but carrying the gun when you forget it’s there so you don’t know that you need to keep it out of other peoples hands until it’s almost too late screams of negligence to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tollhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e99b99/32.png) [@Tollhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tollhouse)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2013, 3:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125/12383 "2013-07-12T15:23:45Z")

</div>

> [@Human\_Action](#):
>
> It’s certainly possible, yes, be it from the gun being so routine as to be below conscious thought, or from stress affecting cognition. I don’t understand the mortal certainly from some posters that it’s not.
> 
> Do you carry a concealed firearm?

Human action, almost everytime I read one of your posts, the term ‘both ways’ comes to mind. Have you ever practiced gymnastics?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125.md?page=618)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/martin-zimmerman-humble-opinions-and-speculation-thread/619125.md?page=620)
