Yes. But that is irrelevant to the point that is being made, where it’s ridiculous to gripe about the integrity of elections when we only know of a shift of less than a dozen votes out of many thousands of votes. You can speculate about how many votes were actually changed, but that’s just speculation. I mean, it’s literally griping about something made up out of whole cloth.
No doubt, which is why I prefaced my comment as pedantry. If anything it emphasizes that obsessing over individual errors is pointless since even if there was a marginally high error rate, the effect on the final result is going to be modest.
But it’s still fraudulent! Let’s dispense with democracy since it doesn’t work. /s
Was this the same race where the Republican candidate was arguing to invalidate his own daughter’s ballot?
I would think this is mostly the opposite, mostly looking for votes the machine marked as invalid that should be valid and having both blue and red eyes agreeing as to what was cast. This happens in the case of a clearly marked oval and perhaps a dot or other stray mark in another oval, or somehow crumpled. While I’m sure that invalidation does happen, I suspect it’s mostly the other way.