# Massive measles outbreak - thank you, Andrew Fucking Wakefield

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [April 19, 2013, 10:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119 "2013-04-19T10:56:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 9:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/101 "2013-04-22T09:14:06Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> Wakefield’s latest stunt (I think he’s actually enjoying being back in the news again) is to call for a “televised public debate” about the MMR vaccine and his beliefs. Seeing as how our own **LavenderBlue** is a pro-vaccine doper with experience debating an antivaxer in public, maybe she can take Wakers up on his challenge (I’d contribute towards her airfare and lodging). 😃

Very bad idea. The tactic Wakefield is using is to try to create the impression that the value of vaccines is debatable. In any short debate a substantial proportion of the audience will either conclude the person who lost actually won, or at the least conclude that the subject matter of the debate is in great doubt.

Well educated people are convinced using facts and reason, less well educated people are convinced by authoritative statements made by someone they trust. The former already think Wakefield is a dangerous quack. The latter are not going to be won over by debate: on the contrary they would see a debate as a good reason to stick with their faith in whatever authority they already accept.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aruvqan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aruvqan/32/2891_2.png) [@aruvqan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aruvqan)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 9:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/102 "2013-04-22T09:53:39Z")

</div>

I got all of my childhood shots after the age of 5 - I had previously had most of the usual diseases [though not mumps, I got mumps in my mid 20s]

Back in the day they just lined everybody up in the gymnasium and ran us through the lines for various shots. I was under the impression that to go to school required it, and it was _universal_ - no kid was allowed in school without shots. I asked my husband, and my brother and they agree, _everybody_ got the shots, nobody skipped out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AnthonyElite](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b487fb/32.png) [@AnthonyElite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AnthonyElite)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/103 "2013-04-22T12:55:31Z")

</div>

I just came in here to say that:

1. The comment about the germs killing anyone was a joke - I thought clearly - emphasizing my doubt of it actually BEING possible. Duh?

2. I’m not a troll…I registered when I was practically a kid. I know what your thinking…I planned this 10 years ago so I would have troll immunity, right? :rolleyes:

3. I’m not playing as if I don’t understand, I’M AN ACCOUNTANT DAMN IT, NOT A SCIENTIST! I have a high school education in biology. I have read several studies that point me in either direction of the vaccination debate. I don’t know the nitty-gritty science behind all of it - though I do try - there are too many things in this world to research all of them properly. It’s hard enough figuring out what to eat these days.

4. I feel that my gut instinct is not unreasonable though you are playing like it is. I see that there is an argument on the issue, vaccination is a relatively new science compared to the depth of study of other sciences, and there are logical arguments with research on both sides.

You are currently not doing something, never had issues with it before, and someone is trying to sway you to take preventative measures against it. Meanwhile there are some logical arguments against the measures. Therefore my action is to do nothing until there is no evidence.

And you are calling these people greedy for not wanting immunizations, which they view to be potentially dangerous and under-researched, because your snowflake who can’t get immunizations needs immunity through me? Bashing me is not a reasonable method to sway me, and neither is dehumanizing me.

Yes, I am afraid of entering a world were immunizations are mandatory to be part of society. Is that so wrong?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 1:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/104 "2013-04-22T13:20:50Z")

</div>

> [@Princhester](#):
>
> The tactic Wakefield is using is to try to create the impression that the value of vaccines is debatable. In any short debate a substantial proportion of the audience will either conclude the person who lost actually won, or at the least conclude that the subject matter of the debate is in great doubt.

I know, I was being facetious. When **LavenderBlue** posted here awhile back about her plans to debate a local antivaxer on the radio I discouraged the idea, noting that such types commonly employ dodges like Gish galloping to overwhelm opponents with irrelevant and misinterpreted effluvia.

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> I’M AN ACCOUNTANT DAMN IT, NOT A SCIENTIST!

If only we could get Jenny McCarthy to say “I’M AN EX-B-MOVIE ACTRESS, NOT A SCIENTIST”.

> [@](#):
>
> I feel that my gut instinct is not unreasonable though you are playing like it is.

Announcing that you have a “high school education in biology” and then suggesting your gut instinct trumps what professionals in immunology and public health tell us is, well, kind of arrogant.

> [@](#):
>
> I see that there is an argument on the issue, vaccination is a relatively new science compared to the depth of study of other sciences, and there are logical arguments with research on both sides.

Vaccination goes back hundreds of years (do a search on smallpox, for instance), a ton of research has gone into demonstrating the safety and efficacy of current vaccines, and it is not a he says-she says deal - the vaccines-are-bad camp has a tiny amount of flawed research to back its claims compared to the mountain of evidence on the other side.

> [@](#):
>
> You are currently not doing something, never had issues with it before, and someone is trying to sway you to take preventative measures against it.

The same goes for seat belts, fire safety laws and other precautionary measures that most of us haven’t had “issues” with. It’s nice to prevent those issues before they occur.

> [@](#):
>
> Bashing me is not a reasonable method to sway me, and neither is dehumanizing me.

You’re referring to vulnerable people who need to be protected through herd immunity as “precious snowflake(s)”, but protest that immunization is “dehumanizing me”? Sheesh, get a grip.

> [@](#):
>
> Yes, I am afraid of entering a world were immunizations are mandatory to be part of society. Is that so wrong?

Adults are not generally required to be immunized except in special circumstances (i.e. in the military or for job/travel reasons). If it upsets you to hear that you can spread infectious disease by not getting a pertussis or flu shot, turn off the TV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 1:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/105 "2013-04-22T13:41:57Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> 1. I feel that my gut instinct is not unreasonable though you are playing like it is. I see that there is an argument on the issue, vaccination is a relatively new science compared to the depth of study of other sciences, and there are logical arguments with research on both sides.

[200 years long enough for you?](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Jenner)

> [@](#):
>
> You are currently not doing something, never had issues with it before, and someone is trying to sway you to take preventative measures against it. Meanwhile there are some logical arguments against the measures. Therefore my action is to do nothing until there is no evidence.
> 
> And you are calling these people greedy for not wanting immunizations, which they view to be potentially dangerous and under-researched, because your snowflake who can’t get immunizations needs immunity through me? Bashing me is not a reasonable method to sway me, and neither is dehumanizing me.

You are substantially dismissing and downplaying the amount of evidence we have about the efficacy of vaccination. This is not new age guesswork; there are literally centuries of experiments and evidence to back up the view that immunizing people is a **good thing**. Take the point that smallpox has been eradicated and polio nearly so - it was not all that long ago that these diseases were feared by the general public, that death or a lifetime of disability would follow in their wake. Nowadays we barely think of them. That’s what immunization has done for the world.

Do some people view them as “potentially dangerous and underresearched”? Yes, but people’s views are not always reflective of reality.

Are they potentially dangerous? To a very small extent - nothing is risk-free and there is always the potential for allergic reactions and other bad side effects to any medication.

Are they underresearched? No. Not remotely.

And are they riskier than going unimmunized? \*Hell \*no.

> [@](#):
>
> Yes, I am afraid of entering a world were immunizations are mandatory to be part of society. Is that so wrong?

Yes. Because the alternative is the return of epidemics of preventable diseases and deaths, a far more fearsome - and rightly so - proposition.

I recognize that your feelings are being hurt by the implication that not getting immunized is a selfish act. To which I refer you to my OP: there’s a measles epidemic going on because too many people decided that they didn’t want a vaccination, an epidemic that affects not only them but the very young, the very old and the otherwise-immunocompromised. In Wales 77 people have been hospitalized and one man is dead so far. And all for **nothing**.

So suck it up, Bucky and get the shots. The life you’re risking may not be your own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 2:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/106 "2013-04-22T14:39:12Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Nitpick:
> 
> Rubeola = measles  
> Rubella = German measles

Correct - I got the names swapped around.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AnthonyElite](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/b487fb/32.png) [@AnthonyElite](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AnthonyElite)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/107 "2013-04-22T15:48:26Z")

</div>

No, **Jackmannii** , I never suggested my high school education trumps modern science. I suggested that my lack of higher-level understanding on the issue prevented me from making a fully informed decision. Furthermore I identified the pressures of modern life as a limiting factor in my knowledge. I DO argue that my logic on the issue is sound. You talk about seat belts as an example…yes, I understand seat belts. That is a very simple situation - it requires only a very basic understanding of physics to understand why a seat belt is important. You tried to apply that to an issue as complex as biology. That’s a joke. I was simply stating that my logic was not faulty: where I am unsure about an issue and am waiting for a more reliable information base, and I don’t perceive any immediate threat to my person, I find it reasonable to maintain course until I am more certain. That is reasonable, no?

No arrogance, whatsoever - humility would be the right word. I admit no special knowledge in this issue and rely on more intelligent people to handle it.

I was not saying that immunizations are in some way dehumanizing, I was saying that by polarizing the debate and demonizing the opponent you are hurting your argument, not helping it. I want human suffering no more than you, I am compassionate being, I hope.

And, I thought of course, that it was clear that I know we aren’t CURRENTLY required to get immunizations, rather I am afraid of a FUTURE scenario. I’m not on the anti “side” or the pro “side”. I am on the “want what is best for future generations” side. This means carefully weighing in on all ideas, even though they may seem foolish.

I know that the anti-vaxers are a small minority…but that does not mean it doesn’t warrant consideration. I may be fairly ignorant in matters of biology, but I understand that a majority DOES NOT mean correctness, it means acceptance. There are instances - such as the world being round, not flat - that the majority is wrong.

To **Gyrate** ; my feelings aren’t hurt. I was simply trying to clarify an issue I did not understand. I NEVER knew that I was supposed to be getting immunizations to prevent OTHERS from getting sick. No one told me. Ever!

Also, as to the amount of knowledge on the subject; 200 years is a long time relative to my life, yes. Relative to the knowledge of medical history it is not. Relative to human history it is a speck. I am simply suggesting that we might NOT know as much as we think about these immunizations and that although I value human life, if I think the human race itself could be at stake on this issue I think it is worth waiting. Again, I don’t know, I’m an accountant.

**Back to the discussion:** I can’t find it right now - I’ll keep looking - but haven’t some viruses/germs altered DNA? Would that be a danger - unknowingly introducing an immunization that negatively altered DNA?

On whole I think the issue is more complex than proponents are making it out to be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 4:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/108 "2013-04-22T16:22:47Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> I understand that a majority DOES NOT mean correctness, it means acceptance. There are instances - such as the world being round, not flat - that the majority is wrong.

That’s a shitty argument.

The majority of the _informed and educated_ is a better metric. Those have known the world is round for a couple thousand years or more.

Likewise, the same majority of the _informed and educated_ have known vaccines are better than the alternative for centuries now.

And even as uninformed and uneducated as some people are, certainly, we don’t have kids running around with pox marks or in wheelchairs or dead in coffins from smallpox anymore. Nor (except in isolated parts of the world) do we fear our kids will ever get smallpox or polio.

And, for a couple generations at least, we didn’t fear our kids getting measles, mumps, whooping cough, or several other diseases. And it’s only now that people have stopped having their kids vaccinated that ‘magically’ these diseases are popping back up.

That’s more than a majority opinion or a newly accepted scientific theory - that’s observable fucking reality.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 4:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/109 "2013-04-22T16:43:51Z")

</div>

> [@drew870mitchell](#):
>
> Surely your doctor knows. I got chickenpox the old fashioned way so I just took the discussion at face value and never did any follow-up. First few Google results say the usual administration is one shot at 12-15 months and another at 4-6 years. Maybe that is what they meant.

Unfortunately, the cite says nothing about being immunized as a young adult, nor my personal gap between shots (especially since I don’t remember if I got the 4-6 year shot).

Not sure what this means for me. Hmm.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Morgyn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/morgyn/32/3041_2.png) [@Morgyn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Morgyn)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/110 "2013-04-22T17:00:37Z")

</div>

**AnthonyElite** , the last known case of smallpox in the wild, as it were, was in [October 1977](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395794/). This was \*entirely \*due to widespread enforcement of vaccinations against it. Except for samples in some (really well-secured and with strict protocols in place) bio labs, mostly governmental, the smallpox virus no longer exists.

The point people are trying to make, which you may be missing, is that while vaccinations can have some bad side effects, the incidence is very low and (usually) not particularly harmful. Getting the actual disease being vaccinated against, however, is usually \*very \*harmful and can be deadly. Witness this family, who were anti-vaccine until their [son got tetanus](http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10860122) and nearly died of it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/111 "2013-04-22T17:02:07Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> I know that the anti-vaxers are a small minority…but that does not mean it doesn’t warrant consideration.

Antivax views have gotten ample consideration and have been shot down, not because they represent minority opinion but because they are deeply and provably wrong. The individual (Wakefield) who sparked this thread is a good example of a “minority” researcher who conducted heavily flawed, fraudulent and unethical research, while collecting huge sums of money from a lawyers’ group hoping to sue vaccine manufacturers (and participated in other gross conflicts of interest). His “landmark” research paper got retracted not because it represented a minority viewpoint but because it was (to use a highly scientific term) bullshit.

> [@](#):
>
> I can’t find it right now - I’ll keep looking - but haven’t some viruses/germs altered DNA? Would that be a danger - unknowingly introducing an immunization that negatively altered DNA?

Some infectious disease organisms control DNA expression and take over cell function as part of the natural infectious process. Vaccinating against these organisms prevents this from happening.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MegaBee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f0a364/32.png) [@MegaBee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MegaBee)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/112 "2013-04-22T17:26:42Z")

</div>

> [@Leaper](#):
>
> Unfortunately, the cite says nothing about being immunized as a young adult, nor my personal gap between shots (especially since I don’t remember if I got the 4-6 year shot).
> 
> Not sure what this means for me. Hmm.

Your doctor can order a blood test that will determine whether or not you need a booster shot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/113 "2013-04-22T17:30:52Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> **Back to the discussion:** I can’t find it right now - I’ll keep looking - but haven’t some viruses/germs altered DNA? Would that be a danger - unknowingly introducing an immunization that negatively altered DNA?

Viruses do that. Vaccinations do not and cannot do that. You have correctly identified yet another excellent reason why vaccinations are better than natural diseases.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cat\_Whisperer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cat_whisperer/32/4839_2.png) [@Cat\_Whisperer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cat_Whisperer)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/114 "2013-04-22T17:49:38Z")

</div>

[I posted this back in 2008](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10125195) - a quick and dirty run-down of what the diseases we vaccinate against look like, and what they do.

> [@](#):
>
> I’ll give you a brief description of the disease caused by each of these organisms commonly vaccinated for (paraphrasings from site listed previously) - please take the time to read this long post. It is important to all of us that this particular ignorance is fought.
> 
> Diphtheria - Bacteria that releases a toxin that makes breathing and swallowing difficult; also attacks heart, kidneys, and nerves. Before vaccination, diphtheria was a common cause of death in children and adolescents, with 150,000 cases occurring each year.
> 
> Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) - Bacteria that causes meningitis, sepsis (blood infection), epiglottitis, athritis, osteomyelitis, and pneumonia. Symptoms include fever, stiff neck, drowsiness and can progress to coma and death. Bacteria can cause permanent paralysis, deafness, blindness, and mental retardation. Most people carry Hib in their nose and throats (most adults are immune to Hib).
> 
> Hepatitis A - Virus causes inflammation of the liver. Symptoms include fever, jaundice, nausea, and vomiting. Kills about 50 Americans each year. Transmitted in food and water as well as human contact. Prevalent everywhere in the world except for North America.
> 
> Hepatitis B - Virus causes inflammation of the liver, cirrhosis (severe liver disease), cancer of the liver. Many infected people carry the disease asymptomatically. 5,000 Americans die from Hepatitis B each year. Another 10,000 develop long-term hepatitis. Transmitted by casual contact and/or contact with body fluids of carriers.
> 
> Influenza - 40,000 Americans killed by influenza virus every year. 21 million people killed in worldwide influenza pandemic in 1918. Symptoms include high fever, chills, severe muscle aches and headache, runny nose and cough. Complications include severe and possibly fatal pneumonia. People with weakened immune systems may die from influenza.
> 
> Measles - Virus that causes high fever, red, raised rash, and “pink eye.” Can often develop into pneumonia which can cause death. Older children infected with measle virus can develop encephalitis (infection of the brain) which can cause permanent brain damage. 66 cases of measles reported in U.S. in 2005.
> 
> Meningococcal infection - Bacterial infection causing meningitis and sepsis. Meningitis from meningococcus has a 5% death rate for children. Sepsis from meningococcus has a 33% death rate for children (often within 12 hours of contracting the bacteria). Symptoms of meningitis include stiff neck, headache, fever, and drowsiness. Symptoms of sepsis include fever, shock, and coma. Every year 2,500 Americans infected with meningococcus; 300 die. Approximately 400 people who survive infection have permanent disabilties such as seizures, loss of limbs, kidney disease, deafness or mental retardation. Infection spread by intimate contact with infected person (kissing, sharing food and beverages, staying in same house or room for more than four hours a day).
> 
> Mumps - Virus that causes swelling in the parotid or salivary glands. Can cause meningitis and deafness. In men infected with mumps, can cause orchitis (infection of testicles) and sterility. Mumps in pregnant women can kill the fetus.
> 
> Pertussis (whooping cough) - Extremely contagious bacterial infection (infection caused by infectious droplets). Causes children to cough uncontrollably, often so bad they are unable to catch their breath. Pneumonia or seizures can develop. Children catch pertussis from adults - around 600,000 to 900,000 adults get pertussis each year, causing about 10 deaths in children even with the vaccine. Very serious for babies and young children.
> 
> Pneumococcus - Bacteria that causes serious infections of infants, toddlers, older people, and immunocompromised people. Causes meningitis, bloodstream infections, and pneumonia (as well as ear infections). Pneumonia includes high fever, cough, rapid, difficult breathing, and empyema that can compress and collapse a lung. Commonly found in the lining of nose and throat in 25% of humans. In the U.S. in 2000, pneumococcus caused 700 cases of meningitis, 17,000 cases of bloodstream infections, and 71,000 cases of pneumonia. Because of the overuse of antibiotics, many pneumococcus bacteria are now resistant to antibiotics.
> 
> Poliovirus - Highly contagious virus causes sore throat, fever, stomach pain/vomiting, stiff neck, and/or headache. Virus starts in intestines and travels through blood to brain and spinal cord. Paralysis is caused by virus attacking nervous system. 10% of people infected recovered fully - the rest confined to wheelchairs or iron lungs for the rest of their lives. Virus transmitted by fecal-oral route or oral-oral route, with a nearly 100% infection rate when children come in contact with poliovirus. Polio eradicated from the US, but still active in a dozen countries.
> 
> Rotavirus - Virus that causes infection of the intestines. Symptoms are high fever, persistent and severe vomiting, diarrhea. Extremely common infection - before the vaccine, 2.7 million children were infected, resulting in 55,000 - 70,000 hospitalizations and 20 to 60 deaths.
> 
> Rubella (German Measles) - Virus that causes mild rash, gland swelling, possible swelling of small joints and low-grade fever. Rubella in children is not a serious infection, but rubella virus can infect fetuses, causing blindness, deafness, heart defects or mental retardation. If infected in the first trimester of pregnancy, there is an 85% chance of permanent damage to the fetus. Female children in particular are vaccinated to protect their future fetuses. Rubella virtually eradicated in the U.S., but common in other countries.
> 
> Tetanus (lockjaw) - Bacteria found in the soil creates a toxin that causes muscle spasms that can interfere with breathing, causing suffocation, and also damage the heart. Tetanus bacteria are everywhere; every year 70 cases of tetanus causing 15 deaths are reported.
> 
> Varicella-zoster virus (chickenpox) - Extremely contagious virus that causes low-grade fever and blisters over entire body. Usually a mild infection, but can cause empyema (pus between lungs and chest wall), pneumonia, encephalitis, and Group A Streptococcus infection (“flesh-eating” bacteria) which enter through the skin during varicella infection. Before the vaccine, one child per week would die in the U.S. from chickenpox. Varicella virus lives in the human body for your entire life; it may re-activate later in life to cause extremely painful nerve blisters called Shingles.

I guess I should do more research and update my statistics, since this was from 2008.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rollo\_Tomasi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/58956e/32.png) [@Rollo\_Tomasi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rollo_Tomasi)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/115 "2013-04-22T17:52:02Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> where I am unsure about an issue and am waiting for a more reliable information base, and I don’t perceive any immediate threat to my person, I find it reasonable to maintain course until I am more certain. That is reasonable, no?

What do you consider a “reliable information base”? The National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Harvard Medical School support vaccination. What proof do you need or what organization needs to say “vaccination is safe” for you to consider the matter closed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolga](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/e56c9b/32.png) [@Kolga](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolga)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 5:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/116 "2013-04-22T17:53:40Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> On whole I think the issue is more complex than proponents are making it out to be.

No. No, it’s not.

Vaccination science has been around since Jenner, with earlier attempts at inoculation [dating all the way back to around 1000](http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/all).

We know how vaccines work. We know the statistics regarding the miniscule chances of very rare adverse reactions to vaccines and how those relate to the much, much more common chances of a dangerous or deadly reaction to the diseases the vaccines prevent.

We know that vaccines are not related to autism. They are not related to diabetes. They are not related to asthma. They are not related to ADHD. They are not related to any of the other dozens of conditions that anti-vaccine propagandists claim.

They do not work for 100% of people (some people do not seroconvert, others do not develop a complete antibody response). They do work for a significant percentage of the population.

Vaccination is a simple decision. Vaccinate yourself and your children, unless there is a legitimate established medical need not to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wolf333](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolf333/32/3460_2.png) [@Wolf333](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wolf333)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/117 "2013-04-22T18:01:51Z")

</div>

> [@Kolga](#):
>
> No. No, it’s not.
> 
> Vaccination science has been around since Jenner, with earlier attempts at inoculation [dating all the way back to around 1000](http://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/timelines/all).
> 
> We know how vaccines work. We know the statistics regarding the miniscule chances of very rare adverse reactions to vaccines and how those relate to the much, much more common chances of a dangerous or deadly reaction to the diseases the vaccines prevent.
> 
> We know that vaccines are not related to autism. They are not related to diabetes. They are not related to asthma. They are not related to ADHD. They are not related to any of the other dozens of conditions that anti-vaccine propagandists claim.
> 
> They do not work for 100% of people (some people do not seroconvert, others do not develop a complete antibody response). They do work for a significant percentage of the population.
> 
> Vaccination is a simple decision. Vaccinate yourself and your children, unless there is a legitimate established medical need not to do so.

We also know that vaccination helps those around you, which, in the long run, helps you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 6:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/118 "2013-04-22T18:13:07Z")

</div>

One of the sickening things in the latest sets of apologia is the use of ignorance as an excuse.

“I’m not an expert, but” or “It’s not really settled that” or whatever.

No matter how much **AnthonyElite** claims to the contrary, his ignorance is not as good as our knowledge. And that’s his argument in a nutshell - his (and anti-vaxxers) ignorance is as good as our knowledge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kolga](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/e56c9b/32.png) [@Kolga](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kolga)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 6:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/119 "2013-04-22T18:19:14Z")

</div>

> [@Wolf333](#):
>
> We also know that vaccination helps those around you, which, in the long run, helps you.

Yes. The measles outbreak that was the subject of the OP is a good example of what happens when anti-vaccine lies reduce herd immunity.

> [@Great\_Antibob](#):
>
> One of the sickening things in the latest sets of apologia is the use of ignorance as an excuse.
> 
> “I’m not an expert, but” or “It’s not really settled that” or whatever.
> 
> No matter how much **AnthonyElite** claims to the contrary, his ignorance is not as good as our knowledge. And that’s his argument in a nutshell - his (and anti-vaxxers) ignorance is as good as our knowledge.

Yes. “I’m not an expert…” Well, there ARE experts in this area, and they understand the science, and although there are a few crackpot exceptions, the expert consensus is that vaccines are safe and save lives.

“It’s not really settled…” Yes. Yes, it is. Again, with the exception of a few crackpots and proven conmen (Wakefield, Geiers).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2013, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119/120 "2013-04-22T18:32:32Z")

</div>

> [@AnthonyElite](#):
>
> Also, as to the amount of knowledge on the subject; 200 years is a long time relative to my life, yes. Relative to the knowledge of medical history it is not. Relative to human history it is a speck. I am simply suggesting that we might NOT know as much as we think about these immunizations and that although I value human life, if I think the human race itself could be at stake on this issue I think it is worth waiting. Again, I don’t know, I’m an accountant.

Bollocks. Vaccinations pre-date practically every part of modern medicine and treatment/prevention of disease. Vaccination is older than germ theory, older than washing your hands between patients. You’re not arguing from a stance of simple ignorance, but a stance of blatant misinformation. Unless you think we should stop using antibiotics and anti-septic procedures as well, then your “because history” argument makes … no, it still doesn’t make sense, but it’d at least be a consistent argument.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/massive-measles-outbreak-thank-you-andrew-fucking-wakefield/656119.md?page=7)
