# Men's Rights Movement may have a big future.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mens-rights-movement-may-have-a-big-future/655049>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [April 7, 2013, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mens-rights-movement-may-have-a-big-future/655049 "2013-04-07T01:15:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 308

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ladyfoxfyre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ad7895/32.png) [@ladyfoxfyre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ladyfoxfyre)\
**Post date:** [April 16, 2013, 1:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mens-rights-movement-may-have-a-big-future/655049/308 "2013-04-16T13:35:18Z")

</div>

> [@blindboyard](#):
>
> “paternity leave feminist” brings up some neutral sites on the front page, several where google has thoughtfully corrected it to “maternity leave feminist”

You are a liar. Google does not autocorrect “paternity leave” to “maternity leave”.

> [@](#):
>
> and a couple of ladyfoxfyre’s sites, the “feminist philosophers” one, which takes the position that men should only have leave if the mother’s voluntarily give up some of theirs

This is bullshit as well. The article is discussing a UK proposal which allows women to transfer their existing maternity leave to their husbands. None of this “men should only have leave if the mothers voluntarily give up some of theirs”. It’s discussing an actual proposal in the UK parliament not saying that is the only way men should have leave.

I’m starting to see the problem here. You’re a goddamned liar about everything you bring up, and that’s why nobody is interesting in debating you. You can barely be arsed to cite anything, and when people DO bring you citations you can’t even READ them correctly enough to parse what they say. Good luck with your MRA propaganda wall-o’-text diatribes buddy.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mens-rights-movement-may-have-a-big-future/655049)._