Mental Hygiene

Factual Questions
41

Maybe you never stayed in one place long enough to get to know the culture?

I don’t know, and frankly, reading your posts hurts. Seems like somewhere along the lines you would have learned to punctuate and format even something close to correctly.

I don’t even know what it is you’re looking for with this thread. Are you looking for information, or do you want to confirm your personal observations or what, exactly? Is this about evolution or politics or ethnography? Or is this some unified theory of Americana you’re working on?

42

I’m going to assume that that’s an honest error and not an intentional dig.

I’m going to echo WhyNot here. You seem to be looking for something well beyond the scope of your original question. Maybe you should open a thread in Great Debates and clearly lay out what position you’re arguing in favor of?

You seem to have constructed your own ideosyncratic system for grouping together abstract concepts. You act at though the connections you’ve come up with are somehow absolute and intuitively obvious, even though other posters have pointed out that in some cases your model contracts what actually occurs in the real world. You then make sweeping proclamations based on this ideosyncratic philosophy … which, not surprisingly, are also demonstrably wrong.

There is no “cowboy gene”. There are no significant genetic differences between urban and rural dwellers. The cultural differences between urban and rural dwellers are far more complicated and fluid than you state. In short, your model is flawed, your conclusions are wrong, and you seem confused about the difference between evidence and opinion.

43

whynot
whynot Some unified theory of Americana we americans work on together, certainly unification needs, it does.

whynot you are empathic and I like it. You are becoming mentally Healthy.

As a further Hygienic treatment considering chicagos own history of agri-business, the closing of the feedlots, the effects of the removal of the signs of a natural order from the city. The chicagoites wanted what the dominate eastern metropolises were enjoying and did not want to be ridiculed as that bunch of filty cowboys. Chicago wanted to become a center of refinement and the arts not cowshit and farts. Keep in mind the need for the feedlot is still all those empty bellies and the agri business and all those that labor in it deserve respect and appreciates all the technological help that the urban dwellers can provide to reduce humanities footprint on the rurual environment.

You were thinking whynot, start a thread “The unified theory of Americana” or AKA "why the blues are blues and the reds are reds and will there ever be purple!

As a point of order, I would like one rule, Lets agree to muzzle solipsism from la la land.
In my opinion la la land hasn’t done any good beginning with that movie “Birth of a Nation”

44

Um, what color is the sky in your world?

45

Solipsism? That makes no sense. I think you mean “sophistry”, which is an unfair charge but at least scans.

In any case, you don’t get to decide who talks and who doesn’t.

46

After reading a little Philip Dick this afternoon I find that this thread makes more sense, though it still isn’t coherent.

47

I’d rather trade places with Sisyphus than parse this thread.

48

I’ve discovered that playing the bongo drums in a black turtleneck sweater and beret while smoking thin chronic cigarettes makes reading momsgladiolas posts much more bearable.