Menu expansion at fast food restaurants

I realize that sounds inherently contradictory that I would rail against breakfast sandwiches and not “regular” sandwiches but I still remember when Timmy’s was pastries, coffee and soup/sandwich items. Their misguided attempt to be all things to everyone has resulted in an overall decrease in what made them good in the first place. Cost cutting measures like premade frozen dough and this plethora of items has made them shittier, not better, with time.

FWIW, I think even the coffee at McDs is better now than T-Hos , as are the breakfast items, and this is coming from someone who generally avoids the Clown whenever possible.

I see it the other way around - the burger is good, but overpriced, but the fries are some of the best fast-food fries I have ever had (probably because they aren’t crispy).

When I saw this thread, the first thing that came to mind was JITB - especially the commercial from a few years ago:
A customer walks into a generic competitor’s fast food restaurant.
“Breakfast?” “Burger”
Jack then goes into a short spiel about his breakfast menu.
“Lunch?” “Burger”
Another spiel about the lunch options - “not just burgers.”
“Dinner?” “Burger”
Yet another spiel, this time about larger items for dinner.
In other words, the varied menu was a selling point for JITB.

I found a more detailed link here.

Oh, it definitely was a selling point. How they expected us to execute that menu with a speed of service goal of 3 minutes and 30 seconds from when a car pulls up to the order box to when they leave the drive-thru, and cook everything to order (when most products have a cook time of 2-3 minutes), they were a little more vague on.

Have to get on the McD’s coffee bandwagon. Best idea ever. Now, if they’d just bring back the chicken biscuits.
Didn’t the original McD menu expansion come from the Lenten fast, when burger revenue would just tank?

Today I just don’t think of the hamburger as the one item every kid will eat. Seems like it’s chicken fingers/nuggets instead. And I’m really one with the wagon wheel pasta with butter deal. Butter only was the only way I’d eat pasta until a light came down from the heavens, and alfredo sauce hit the US midwest.

Reminds me of Taco Bell’s Five Ingredients Combined In Totally New Way.

Comparing with the Firebug, currently age 7:
Likes spaghetti.
But eats it the way you ate your wagon wheel pasta - just with butter and salt.
Pronounced it ”P’sketti” (definitely more of a ‘P’ sound than a ‘B’, but otherwise right there)
Hates tomatoes and tomato sauce
Loves ketchup

But good question about the wagon wheels, because I remember them from way back, but can’t remember when I’ve seen them last. The Firebug is a bit of a messy eater with spaghetti, so I’d like to try them out on him, but I’d want to see if he reliably liked them before ordering 12 bags through Amazon per Lasciel’s link.

But in response to this:

I’ve almost never seen anyone do the twirling thing in real life. I’ve always assumed that maybe native Italians, and some Italian-Americans, did that, and maybe a few of us Anglos did it as an affectation. But pretty much everyone I know uses the edge of their fork to cut a bite-sized chunk of spaghetti and sauce, then slides the fork under it to get it into one’s mouth. No muss, no fuss, occasional dangling spaghetti, but not much when it happens.

That is funny… my experience is the exact opposite. The only ones I see cutting the spaghetti are Moms doing it for their kids.

Exactly. People who cut pasta would probably jack-light deer or take 17 items through the “15 or fewer” lane at the grocery store.