# Mercury, Vaccines, and Autism

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261>\
**Category:** Cecil's Columns/Staff Reports\
**Created:** [June 8, 2007, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261 "2007-06-08T14:31:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Washoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/ecae2f/32.png) [@Washoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Washoe)\
**Post date:** [June 10, 2007, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/21 "2007-06-10T22:20:55Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=C K Dexter Haven]  
One of my jobs is screening Cecil’s incoming e-mail, and there have been a couple of notes of interest. My favorite is the guy who says that it’s not vaccines that cause autism, it’s fluoridation of water.  
[/QUOTE]

Nonsense—it’s caused by zinc deficiency.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cartooniverse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cartooniverse/32/3084_2.png) [@Cartooniverse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cartooniverse)\
**Post date:** [June 10, 2007, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/22 "2007-06-10T23:15:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=C K Dexter Haven]  
One of my jobs is screening Cecil’s incoming e-mail, and there have been a couple of notes of interest. My favorite is the guy who says that it’s not vaccines that cause autism, it’s fluoridation of water.  
[/QUOTE]

> [@General Jack D. Ripper( from "Dr. Strangelove")](#):
>
> We must preserve the purity of our precious bodily fluids. Mandrake, have you ever heard of fluorodation of the water supply???

😃

I wonder if Cecil is going to do a follow-up?

Cartooniverse

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sophistry_and_Illusion)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2007, 8:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/23 "2007-06-11T08:58:34Z")

</div>

Gee, I wonder where \*\*quondam \*\* went? I guess facts disagree with his digestion.

I would laugh at people like this if their scaremongering weren’t costing lives. But since it is, I despise them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2007, 2:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/24 "2007-06-11T14:18:54Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=C K Dexter Haven]  
One of my jobs is screening Cecil’s incoming e-mail, and there have been a couple of notes of interest. My favorite is the guy who says that it’s not vaccines that cause autism, it’s fluoridation of water.  
[/QUOTE]  
But you didn’t send him over here? Why don’t you want us to have fun? ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2007, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/25 "2007-06-11T14:32:09Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=quondam]  
Well, if you inject enough mercury into a tiny infant, isn’t it possible that neurological problems could ensue?  
[/QUOTE]  
If we indiscriminately beam radio signals into outer space, isn’t it _possible_ that we will attract the attentions of malevolent Lobster People from Alpha Centauri who will visit the Earth in indetectable spacecraft and busy themselves kidnapping people and installing laser-guided mind control devices in their taints?

Yes, and because it’s _possible_, obviously that is proof that _it happened._ Quick! Cover your taint in tinfoil!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mort\_Gage](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/bc8723/32.png) [@Mort\_Gage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mort_Gage)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2007, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/26 "2007-06-11T20:37:55Z")

</div>

So if mercury in vaccines is causing autism, why is a male four times more likely to get autism than a female? Are we to believe males get vaccinated four times more frequently?

[http://www.montereyherald.com/health/ci\_6064008](http://www.montereyherald.com/health/ci_6064008)

> [@](#):
>
> Autism is a disorder that predominately affects males (80 percent of all affected individuals). Of those with the Asperger’s form, 90 percent are male.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fessie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c37758/32.png) [@fessie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/fessie)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/27 "2007-06-12T01:44:30Z")

</div>

[It’s being tried in court.](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070611/ap_on_go_ot/autism_vaccines)

> [@AP](#):
>
> WASHINGTON - The parents of 12-year-old Michelle Cedillo asked a federal court Monday to find that their child’s autism was caused by common childhood vaccines, a precedent-setting case that could pave the way for thousands of autistic children to receive compensation from a government fund set up to help people injured by the shots…
> 
> Her parents, Theresa and Michael Cedillo, allege a preservative called thimerosal that had been used in vaccines weakened their daughter’s immune system and prevented her body from clearing the measles virus after she was immunized for the disease at age 15 months.
> 
> Today, Michelle suffers from a litany of health problems, including severe autism, inflammatory bowel disease, glaucoma and epilepsy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![susan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/susan/32/17537_2.png) [@susan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/susan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 2:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/28 "2007-06-12T02:11:03Z")

</div>

Meanwhile, these pleasant young fellows, whose parents did not believe in vaccination, exposed numerous people to measles, [one](http://www.registerguard.com/news/2007/06/06/ed.edit.measles.jmg.0606.p1.php?section=opinion) by flying, [one](http://www.registerguard.com/news/2007/06/09/a1.publichealth.0609.p1.php?section=cityregion) by disobeying a request (to which he’d agreed) to stay at home so as not to infect others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sophistry_and_Illusion)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 5:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/29 "2007-06-12T05:06:07Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Mort Gage]  
So if mercury in vaccines is causing autism, why is a male four times more likely to get autism than a female? Are we to believe males get vaccinated four times more frequently?  
[/QUOTE]

Ha ha! Nice try. For the vaccine haters, the statement that vaccines cause autism is unfalsifiable. They would explain away this datum by saying something like, “Well, it just goes to show that males are more sensitive than females to thimerosol.”

[QUOTE=W.V.O. Quine]  
Any statement can be held true come what may, if we make drastic enough adjustments elsewhere in the system.  
[/QUOTE]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CurtC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/ce73a5/32.png) [@CurtC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CurtC)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 1:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/30 "2007-06-12T13:30:01Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=quondam]  
How about 87 times the amount that would be considered acceptable from eating fish?  
87 TIMES THE AMOUNT.

“The March 1991 memo, obtained by The Times, said that 6-month-old children who received their shots on schedule would get a mercury dose up to 87 times higher than guidelines for the maximum daily consumption of mercury from fish.”  
[/QUOTE]

So over a period of many months, an infant would get 87 times the recommended limit for _daily_ consumption of fish? And this overlooks the small detail of how toxic the different forms of mercury are - the mercury found in fish is in a methylmercury molecule, which seems to be more persistent and toxic than the ethylmercury molecule that Thimerosal breaks down into.

The levels involved appear to be relatively safe, especially compared to the known risks of these diseases that children are being vaccinated against. Further, the epidemiological data seems to rule out a link between vaccines and autism. Still it’s a good idea to reduce mercury exposure whenever we can, and in the case of infant vaccines, that’s what they did. Flu shots still contain Thimerosal, and I’ve given those to my kids without worry.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![symbo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d07c76/32.png) [@symbo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/symbo)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 1:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/31 "2007-06-12T13:52:47Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Sophistry and Illusion]  
Ha ha! Nice try. For the vaccine haters, the statement that vaccines cause autism is unfalsifiable. They would explain away this datum by saying something like, “Well, it just goes to show that males are more sensitive than females to thimerosol.”  
[/QUOTE]  
Would Spinozas Law would be applicable here? “If the facts do not support the theory…the theory must be changed to support the facts” or something like that…btw, this is a great site…I used to think that the only fix for my angst was watching Dr.Strangelove and The Wages of Fear. :smack:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 2:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/32 "2007-06-12T14:28:30Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Sophistry and Illusion]  
Ha ha! Nice try. For the vaccine haters, the statement that vaccines cause autism is unfalsifiable. They would explain away this datum by saying something like, “Well, it just goes to show that males are more sensitive than females to thimerosol.”  
[/QUOTE]

That identical argument was made in discussion in an anti-vax forum on a messageboard where I am no longer welcome.

The other counter is ‘well, we don’t know what other things in vaccines trigger autism, so we need to play it safe and not vaccinate.’

:rolleyes:

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/33 "2007-06-12T14:53:26Z")

</div>

Folks, the fact that there is a prevalence of autism in males doesn’t exonerate Thimerosol. If the underlying genetic issue that can result in the condition predominates in males, and is simply triggered through environmental contact with the various compounds that are contained in the preservative, there would still be a predominance of male cases, even though the vaccinations are being given to both genders at an equal rate.

The evidence against the Thimerosol connection is much stronger than that, and much more sophisticated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![susan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/susan/32/17537_2.png) [@susan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/susan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/34 "2007-06-12T16:55:30Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Would Spinozas Law would be applicable here? “If the facts do not support the theory…the theory must be changed to support the facts” or something like that

I guess Spinoza might have said it, but I think you mean William of Occam (who, in any event, would have said it first). Occam’s Razor, or the principle of parsimony.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chorpler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chorpler/32/2888_2.png) [@chorpler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chorpler)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 8:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/35 "2007-06-12T20:54:33Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Shoshana]  
I guess Spinoza might have said it, but I think you mean William of Occam (who, in any event, would have said it first). Occam’s Razor, or the principle of parsimony.  
[/QUOTE]

I think you’re confusing two different things. Occam’s Razor involves not unnecessarily multiplying entities, or “All other things being equal, simpler explanations are preferable,” in common usage. **symbo** ’s quote is about evidence overruling theory if the theory and evidence don’t match up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![susan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/susan/32/17537_2.png) [@susan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/susan)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2007, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/36 "2007-06-12T22:38:55Z")

</div>

Okay, so enlighten me with a Spinoza cite. I couldn’t find one this morning, but that means very little given the amount of time I had available to look.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@Sophistry\_and\_Illusion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sophistry_and_Illusion)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2007, 7:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/37 "2007-06-13T07:53:06Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Shodan]  
The other counter is ‘well, we don’t know what other things in vaccines trigger autism, so we need to play it safe and not vaccinate.’

:rolleyes:  
[/QUOTE]

Good one! “Getting our child vaccinated _might_ increase our child’s risk for autism, but not getting our child vaccinated _demonstrably_ raises the risk that our child (and his/her playmates) will get a fatal or crippling disease. So the obvious thing to do is…”

(If you guessed, “Not get the vaccine,” you win the VHAA (Vaccine Haters’ Association of America) coveted Tinfoil Hat Award.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quiddity\_Glomfuster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/c4cdca/32.png) [@Quiddity\_Glomfuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quiddity_Glomfuster)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2007, 10:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/38 "2007-06-13T10:54:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DSYoungEsq]  
Folks, the fact that there is a prevalence of autism in males doesn’t exonerate Thimerosol. If the underlying genetic issue that can result in the condition predominates in males, and is simply triggered through environmental contact with the various compounds that are contained in the preservative, there would still be a predominance of male cases, even though the vaccinations are being given to both genders at an equal rate.

The evidence against the Thimerosol connection is much stronger than that, and much more sophisticated.  
[/QUOTE]

Or perhaps the people who believe that this ‘evidence is strong’ are so happy following their own particular pet theories that they are uninterested in trying to assist in discovering more plausible ones. I’ve heard some health professionals suggest that autism could be triggered by a virus or viruses in people born with a weakness of some sort. I think this is the research theory worth following.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chorpler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chorpler/32/2888_2.png) [@chorpler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/chorpler)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2007, 2:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/39 "2007-06-13T14:50:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Shoshana]  
Okay, so enlighten me with a Spinoza cite. I couldn’t find one this morning, but that means very little given the amount of time I had available to look.  
[/QUOTE]

I don’t have any idea if Spinoza actually said it or not. I’m just saying that the concept under discussion isn’t Occam’s Razor, but a more general philosophy of science – if the evidence and the theory disagree, you have to reformulate your theory rather than discounting the evidence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2007, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261/40 "2007-06-13T15:29:54Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DSYoungEsq]  
Folks, the fact that there is a prevalence of autism in males doesn’t exonerate Thimerosol. If the underlying genetic issue that can result in the condition predominates in males, and is simply triggered through environmental contact with the various compounds that are contained in the preservative, there would still be a predominance of male cases, even though the vaccinations are being given to both genders at an equal rate.

The evidence against the Thimerosol connection is much stronger than that, and much more sophisticated.  
[/QUOTE]

This is correct, of course. It is _possible_ to have varying reactions to environmental factors that are gender-related - males characteristically develop heart problems earlier in life than females, for instance, and women survive longer in cold water than males.

What I should have made clear is that it is taken for granted by anti-vax types that differing rates of autism must necessarily be based on differing reactions to thimerosol for males vs. females. I believe this was **Quiddity Glomfuster** ’s point.

I should have been more clear. One of the annoying things about the anti-vax forum I mentioned earlier is that it was impossible to communicate distinctions like this. They simply ignored detailed explanations and clarifications in favor of endless repetition of whatever they decided was the simplest distortion they could come up with.

Anyway, I don’t want to do the same thing, so **DSYoungEsq** is correct, and I appreciate his input.

Regards,  
Shodan

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/mercury-vaccines-and-autism/407261.md?page=3)
