# Metric system in the US.... what happened?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 1, 2003, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595 "2003-07-01T15:47:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jon\_the\_Geek](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/bbce88/32.png) [@Jon\_the\_Geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jon_the_Geek)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 1:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/21 "2003-07-02T01:50:56Z")

</div>

The argument that finally convinced me that it would be a HUGE pain to switch over, at least fully (and I’m a chemist who doesn’t know most of “our” system to save my life) is that so much of the US is layed out on nice mile-based/acre-based grids (at least in Michigan). Switch to metric, the grids become nonsense.

Also, when I’m driving and see that I have 100 miles left to go, I know I have about 100 minutes left in my trip. That argument is becoming less and less useful as the speed limits move up above 60, though 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dropzone](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dropzone/32/7515_2.png) [@dropzone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dropzone)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 3:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/22 "2003-07-02T03:15:48Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by keeper0 \*  
> \*\*I just wish they had decided that a meter was “one fifth of how far an object will fall in a vacuum at sea level in the first second of freefall” because then g would equal 10 instead of 9.8 \*\*

Hah! Even in metric you think in fractions!

Fractions are easier in pounds and, especially, feet. Half a foot? Six inches. A third? Four inches. A quarter? Three inches.

I had been wondering how well the conversion was going in Britain so I’m glad that this thread exists to confirm my observation: Okay, up to a point. What made me wonder were some British TV shows, travel and cooking, where the measures are given in Imperial and there’s a metric-converting voiceover. I was wondering if these were first recorded for a US audience (didn’t seem likely) or if somebody had mostly given up and the metric was an afterthought (seemed more likely).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Achernar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e274bd/32.png) [@Achernar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Achernar)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 4:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/23 "2003-07-02T04:01:26Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by dropzone \*  
> Fractions are easier in pounds and, especially, feet. Half a foot? Six inches. A third? Four inches. A quarter? Three inches.

Well yeah, if you pick those particular fractions. But what about a fifth of a foot, huh? Or a third of a pound, or half a mile, or an eighth of a yard? Some fractions are easier in foots and pounds, and some are easier in metric. Some are not easy in any system.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 4:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/24 "2003-07-02T04:08:13Z")

</div>

I don’t think there’s “massive resistance” to the metric system in Britain. I would say most people under 40 are more comfortable with metric than imperial, which is only really used for distances, body weight/dimensions, pints of beer, and car fuel consumption (miles per gallon, but we buy petrol (gas) in litres). All recipes I’ve seen in recent years use metric measures, and I’m not at all comfortable with ounces, fluid ounces, “cups” and so on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 4:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/25 "2003-07-02T04:17:53Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by keeper0 \*  
> \*\*I just wish they had decided that a meter was “one fifth of how far an object will fall in a vacuum at sea level in the first second of freefall” because then g would equal 10 instead of 9.8 \*\*

Nah, that would lead to confusion between force and weight again. “10N = 1 kg” sounds too much like a unit conversion when in fact it’s a formula equating two different quantities under a specific condition. I think “c=3x10[sup]8[/sup] m” would have been a better definition of the meter.

I don’t understand the argument about common terms becoming obsolete. “Mileage” will always be an English word, synonymous with “fuel economy” and measured in liter/100km (or km/liter). “Walk a mile in one’s shoes” will make sense if people will just remember (and they will) that a mile is a unit of distance. In Japan we have a saying that a journey of a thousand _ri_ begins with one footstep. Nobody knows how many meters one _ri_ is but we get the sense that a 1000-_ri_ is a fairly long journey, and that’s enough to make sense of the proverb.

Also, a conversion to the metric system doesn’t necessarily mean throwing out _all_ non-metric measures. The Japanese (and the Brits, I presume) still use tablespoons, tablespoons and cups to measure liquids. (Defined as 15ml, 5ml and 180ml respectively.) Room sizes are still measured by the number of _tatami_ (straw mats), except those mats are standardized to 90x180cm.

By the way I’d like to thank the Americans for converting Japan to the metric system during the post-WWII occupation. One of the best things to come out of the occupation IMHO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![commasense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/commasense/32/3017_2.png) [@commasense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/commasense)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 4:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/26 "2003-07-02T04:30:58Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Seven \*  
> \*\*My grade school years were in the middle of the “change over”. I was taught the metric system but not English Standard.
> 
> I’m somewhat pissed the US didn’t convert because I know nothing about English Standard.
> 
> I don’t know how many tablespoons there are in a pound, how many inches in a gallon, or how many fathoms in a ton.
> 
> I can order a pint though. \*\*

Let see, I think I have a conversion table around here somewhere:

45.78 Tablespoons = 1 lb.  
389.55 inches = 1 gal (U.S.)  
466.79 inches = 1 gal (Imp.)  
.788 fathoms = 1 ton  
365 x 100 watts = 1 light year  
8 pints (Imp.) + 8 hours = 1 hangover

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quantum\_Butterfly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/e79b87/32.png) [@Quantum\_Butterfly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quantum_Butterfly)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 4:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/27 "2003-07-02T04:59:43Z")

</div>

Another American who wants metric checking in. Complex math with Imperial measurements is HELL. And don’t even get me started on the township/range land ownership grids, which were done in acres and fractions of acres! Those things are the biggest pain in the butt for those of us working with spatial data. The Ivory Tower solution would be just to wipe the existing township/range crap and implement a nice logical metric-based system. Unfortunately, Ivory Tower solutions rarely work in the real world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asterion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/4da419/32.png) [@asterion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asterion)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 4:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/28 "2003-07-02T04:59:44Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by keeper0 \*  
> \*\*As has been stated above, the other advantage of the metric system is that there is smoother transition from one type of unit to another.
> 
> As an engineer, I can’t tell you how often I do calculations like “One liter of water will have a mass of one kilogram and fill a cube 10 cm on each side.”
> 
> I just wish they had decided that a meter was “one fifth of how far an object will fall in a vacuum at sea level in the first second of freefall” because then g would equal 10 instead of 9.8 \*\*

Problem is, that doesn’t make any sense, as we want our standards to be as universal as possible. Thus, a meter is the distance light travels in a vacuum in some very small fraction of a second, and seconds are defined as a number of oscillations or decays or something of some atom (Co-60?) and so on. Those are universal measurements, limited only by our ability to measure them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![t-keela](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a3d4f5/32.png) [@t-keela](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/t-keela)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 5:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/29 "2003-07-02T05:32:46Z")

</div>

The US nearly adopted the metric system 200 years ago. It’s a shame we didn’t. Now, well…hmmm…We’re a hardheaded bunch aren’t we.

The US was fresh outta Vietnam in '75 when the politicians **told** us we had to adopt the metric system. Considering the cold war, our stubborness and many peoples ignorant cries of it being a communist plot, it never had a chance.

We’re getting there though, slowly but surely. When me and the rest of us old timers kick off…y’all can switch the rest of it.

(BTW I still know how much a peck is.)

I see my booze is no longer sold in half gallons or a quarts.  
Then again…tequila does come from Mexico. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![t-keela](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/a3d4f5/32.png) [@t-keela](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/t-keela)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 5:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/30 "2003-07-02T05:39:30Z")

</div>

I think the metre was by Napoleon’s order…one ten millionth of the distance from the north pole to the equator in line with Paris. The modern adaptation is a wavelength frequency taken from Krypton which was similar (but constant) to the original meter as first defined or some such…

A unit defined by the equal divisions of length from the equator to the north pole through France? Did I remember that right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ms2001](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ms2001/32/18463_2.png) [@Ms2001](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ms2001)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 7:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/31 "2003-07-02T07:24:54Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by The Gaspode \*  
> **Oh, and in Europe, gas milage is expressed as liter/100km.**

SUV manufacturers must love that one.

“Attention car shoppers! If you’re looking for mileage, look no further than the 2005 Maibatsu Monstrosity! Some new cars only get 7 or 8 L/100km, but the 2005 Monstrosity gets an unbeatable 21.5 L/100km!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noone\_Special](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/noone_special/32/2863_2.png) [@Noone\_Special](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Noone_Special)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 7:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/32 "2003-07-02T07:39:20Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> > [@](#):
> >
> > _Originally posted by The Gaspode_  
> > Oh, and in Europe, gas milage is expressed as liter/100km.
> 
> \*Originally posted by Mr2001 \*  
> \*\*SUV manufacturers must love that one.
> 
> “Attention car shoppers! If you’re looking for mileage, look no further than the 2005 Maibatsu Monstrosity! Some new cars only get 7 or 8 L/100km, but the 2005 Monstrosity gets an unbeatable 21.5 L/100km!” \*\*

At least in Israel (fully metric), we use the more intuitive Km/Liter. Results sound _ **worse** _ than miles/gal (by a factor of 1.6/3.89, or roughly 0.4 - so 25 MPG works out to about 10 KPL)

And to answer an earlier post - yes, what English speakers call “Mileage” is called “Kilometrage”. AND a 1000 Km journey begins with a single step … 😉 etc.

Dan Abarbanel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Doomtrain](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/0ea827/32.png) [@Doomtrain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doomtrain)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 8:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/33 "2003-07-02T08:09:47Z")

</div>

The only time I’ve ever seen a metric sign in the States was about 60 miles outside Atlanta on I-75S. Weirdest thing ever, big sign out in the middle of nowhere, “ATLANTA 65 MILES / 125 KM”

Measurements may not be accurate, see store for details, some assembly required, batteries not included…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noone\_Special](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/noone_special/32/2863_2.png) [@Noone\_Special](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Noone_Special)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 9:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/34 "2003-07-02T09:22:15Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by GMRyujin \*  
> \*\*The only time I’ve ever seen a metric sign in the States was about 60 miles outside Atlanta on I-75S. Weirdest thing ever, big sign out in the middle of nowhere, “ATLANTA 65 MILES / 125 KM”  
> \*\*

Which is plain flat wrong, to boot… (65 miles ~ 105 Km)

Dan Abarbanel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 10:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/35 "2003-07-02T10:04:53Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by scr4 \*  
> \*\* “Walk a mile in one’s shoes” will make sense if people will just remember (and they will) that a mile is a unit of distance. \*\*

That’s not even necessary. People only need to know what the meaning of the sentence is. It would work even if people had forgotten what “mile” or “shoe” means, and don’t understand the allegory. I mentionned that in France there are still many sentence used including various old units no longer units. In some cases, most people know that said unit used to be a length or weight unit. But not always so. For instance the sentence “avoir maille a partir avec quelqu’un” (“having a “maille” to share with someone”) means you you can’t agree with someone. Originally, the maille was the smallest monetary unit, hence making its sharing impossible.

However, not only people don’t know that a “maille” was a monetary unit, but even the word “partir” has lost its lost its original meaning “to share” in modern french. So, the sentence, taken litterally, makes absolutely no sense to nobody. However, the whole sentence is still used, and people do understand that it means that you can’t agree with someone. The same would most likely happen if people have forgotten that a mile was used to measure distance, and that a “shoe” was something you put on your feet. They would still get the meaning of “walking a mile in someone’s shoes”. Common sayings are very resilient. They live their own life, independantly from the words used.

Of course it’s not true only for units. Another french saying is “c’est l’hopital qui se moque de la charite” which has the same meaning that “it’s the pot calling the kettle black”. I’m sure plenty of french people wouldn’t know what the word “charite” refers to. And similarily, I’ve seen on this board people wondering about the kettle/pot/black thing, though this would have been obvious for everybody in past times when people were cooking on a fireplace, with kitchenware made of a metal which would blaken over time. It’s no longer true. Some people don’t get the reference. The sentence is still understood, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![clairobscur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/839c29/32.png) [@clairobscur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/clairobscur)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 10:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/36 "2003-07-02T10:30:02Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by t-keela \*  
> \*\*I think the metre was by Napoleon’s order…one ten millionth of the distance from the north pole to the equator in line with Paris. \*\*

Yes…except that it wasn’t Napoleon’s order, but the republic’s order during the revolution. The task of defining the new units was only finished under Napoleon’s reign, however (measuring the distance you’re refering too with some accuracy was a lenghty process, in particular).  
Napoleon, by the way, immediatly decided to give to the new units the names of the former units people were accustomed to. So, a kilogram was called the french equivalent of “pound”, a kilometer the french equivalent of “mile”. Which of course confused people even more, since not only they didn’t have an intuitive grasp of what a kilo was, but they didn’t even know what you were refering to when you were saying or writing “pound”. So, they went on merily on their usual ways, using the former pounds and feets (and sometimes even the regional variants of same) and ignoring the new units. As I wrote before, only much later the metric system was made mandatory and people eventually get along with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Balthisar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/balthisar/32/2825_2.png) [@Balthisar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Balthisar)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 11:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/37 "2003-07-02T11:06:14Z")

</div>

I think the use of the imperial system in the USA is three meters tall and bullet-proof.

That said, living on the Canadian border (and actually paying attention to what goes on around me), kilometers (that’s ka-la’-miturs, not kilo-meters!) and degrees celcius present no major problems. The roadside stands in Ontario seem to always sell by the quart or the pound. A Japanese (metric) auto-plant in Canada (metric) that I went to once had all of their safety-related measurements in the English system (e.g., you need a safety harness if you climb above seven feet – no metric equivilent was even given).

I detest seeing kilometerage on car windshields in Mexico in L/km – it’s just not intuitive. Curiously enough they seem to say millage (mileage) to refer to gasoline consumption, though. And as popular as American football is with the middle classes, yards are no problem for the Mexicans. My wife seems to know all about inches and feet and miles, but doesn’t get Farhenheit very well.

In my local area, we’d have to rename the streets to 12.8km Road; 14.4km Road; 16km Road; and so on up to oh, 51.2km Road. I guess one adapts.

I will say that since we all drive 80mph now, I can’t easily say that at 60mph one mile equals one minute of travel time. On the other hand, in Ontario the OPP are rough, so at 100k/h it’s easy to think in 1/10th of an hour increments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 11:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/38 "2003-07-02T11:30:47Z")

</div>

One thing to remember is that the US has standards of measurement but in the 19th century when most countries adopted the metric system, they didn’t. Every trade in every country had its own system of measurement. So in England, there was a dairyman’s pint, a brewers pint (maybe even a vintner’s pint), an oilmonger’s pint and so on. I once saw a plaque in Zurich saying that this point was 804 meters above sea level (I am making up all these numbers, but they are approximately right; this was on a hill around 400 meters above the city), or 2567 French feet or 2493 Italian or 2602 British feet. Before the British metricized, their fluid ounce was slightly different from the US’s and their pint was 20 oz, not 16. So what metricization did inside a country was to make one standard inside that country and what it did internationally was to create one standard that most countries use. Without that, I think trade would be severely handicapped. Even so, there is a price paid as auto mechanics, for example, generally have to have two sets of tools.

Even though Canada is officially metric, things like nails and screws are still sold only in US sizes, as far as I have seen. A friend of mine told me of going to a lumber yard in Oslo to ask for a 5 cm by 10 cm piece of wood, only to hear the guy call back to the warehouse for a 2 by 4. And from I have seen, fruit and things like that are still sold by the (500 gram) pound in Europe, at least in some places. So quarter-poinder would be understood, although it had better be 125 grams.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirRay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@SirRay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SirRay)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 12:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/39 "2003-07-02T12:40:14Z")

</div>

It would be worth converting simply to get rid of those awful childhood puns of the “smiles is the longest word” and “how many feet in a yard” type.

Or have they already come up with awful SI puns yet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Agback](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/977dab/32.png) [@Agback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Agback)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2003, 12:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595/40 "2003-07-02T12:52:18Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Balthisar \*  
> **I think the use of the imperial system in the USA is three meters tall and bullet-proof.**

You don’t use the Imperial System in the USA. The Imperial System is the one in which there are 20 fluid ounces in a pint and 112 pounds in a hundredweight. The Imperial System was devised and adopted in the UK after the American War of Independence.

You use the US Customary System, also known as ‘English Mediaeval’.

Regards,  
Agback

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/metric-system-in-the-us-what-happened/185595.md?page=3)
