# Michelle Bachman again (maybe there should be a sticky) **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [April 29, 2009, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774 "2009-04-29T21:21:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 5
**Author:** ![Captain\_Carrot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f0a364/32.png) [@Captain\_Carrot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Carrot)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/81 "2009-05-01T16:47:19Z")
> [@Mr.Moto](#): > > I think too that some of her comments over the years might have been misconstrued or deliberately placed in the worst possible light. This has been discussed in other threads. Really? Which ones? When she said that Obama was anti-American? When she said the media should do an expose on Congress and find out who’s pro-America and anti-America? When she claimed to be fighting tyranny in Washington? ---
**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/82 "2009-05-01T16:52:08Z")
Probably the thing about how her church believes that [the Pope is the Antichrist](http://www.wels.net/cgi-bin/site.pl?2617&collectionID=795&contentID=4441&shortcutID=5297). It’s true, but it’s not fair to hold it against her, in the same way that Jeremiah Wright’s shtick shouldn’t have been held against Obama. She’s not a church elder. ---
**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 4:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/83 "2009-05-01T16:54:47Z")
> [@elucidator](#): > > Oh, crap, this thread is going to turn into a quatrain wreck. All right, what do you have to say for yourself, Mr. “indictment pending”? ---
**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 5:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/84 "2009-05-01T17:38:53Z")
I trust I am not required to regard sparkling, witty wordplay with the same gimlet eye as a “bad pun”. Mad Dog 20/20 is not champagne, after all. ---
**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/85 "2009-05-01T17:49:56Z")
> [@Mr.Moto](#): > > I think the Bachman obsession on these boards is attributable to the fact that some of our more vocal members come from her neck of the woods. > > I think too that some of her comments over the years might have been misconstrued or deliberately placed int he worst possible light. This has been discussed in other threads. Are you suggesting that we’ve gone into Bachmann boner overdrive? ---
**Author:** ![Mr.Moto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de0a6/32.png) [@Mr.Moto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Moto)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/86 "2009-05-01T17:51:31Z")
> [@elucidator](#): > > Mad Dog 20/20 is not champagne, after all. You should know. ---
**Author:** ![Mr.Moto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9de0a6/32.png) [@Mr.Moto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Moto)\ **Post date:** [May 1, 2009, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/87 "2009-05-01T17:52:52Z")
> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#): > > Are you suggesting that we’ve gone into Bachmann boner overdrive? “You Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet.” ---
**Author:** ![Gala\_Matrix\_Fire](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/4da419/32.png) [@Gala\_Matrix\_Fire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gala_Matrix_Fire)\ **Post date:** [May 2, 2009, 12:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774/88 "2009-05-02T12:45:05Z")
> [@ElvisL1ves](#): > > Is there still a push to replace his face on the dime with Reagan’s? Last I heard, Nancy Reagan spoke up to say that FDR was one of Ronald Reagan’s heroes and that RR would absolutely not want to replace him on the dime. I think they dropped it after that. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/michelle-bachman-again-maybe-there-should-be-a-sticky/494774.md?page=4)