I read the posts you quoted.
Many men see women as having inherent value over some random stranger on the street because of their mating potential, as indicated by various secondary sexual characteristics. Were nate to attempt to seek a relationship with one of these women, he might act charming and want to know her as a person, but he wouldn’t be bothering if she didn’t have clear mate value, as indicated by various characteristics.
So what is the part that offends you, specifically?
Is it the fact that his subconscious mind skips straight to fantasizing about the sex even though the woman is a total stranger that offends you? (this would certain explain but not justify why rapes are so common, if a large percentage of men have similar mental urges)
Or is the discussion of exactly which secondary sexual characteristics?
How could he have phrased how he sees the world in a way that *doesn’t *offend you?