Regardless, it’s not at all uncommon to see 10-12 year old cars that never saw a wax job in their lives tooling along with shiny factory paint jobs where water still beads up.
That was my point- you used to be able to tell the vintage of a car by the sheen of the paint, more or less, as older cars were less dull because the paint would weather over time, which seems to be a problem that’s been predominantly solved. Same with body panel corrosion.
I drove my first Honda for 17 years before replacing it nearly 9 years ago. And you could not tell how old my current one is. Cars, nearly alone among consumer goods have vastly improved over the years, both in reliability and life span, not to mention safety (although the latter was government mandated). The first car I drove, a '49 Chevvy, was a wreck at 12 years and it was always chancy whether it would start in the winter. My '55 Ford lost its engine at 13 years (the frame rusted out and the engine ended up on a city street). My '70 Volvo was falling apart at 13 years. But now? Cars seem to go on forever. I expect my Honda to outlive me.
Unless you are a real petro-head, you may not realize how old a car is. I recently bought a used 2002 Mercedes SLK 230 roadster. That’s 14 years old! One of my co-workers saw it in the parking garage and assumed it was brand new. It is in great shape, but anyone who is a car enthusiast would know it is not the current generation body style, but to the average guy, it looks current.
He was stunned to find out my “new” convertible is actually 3 years older than his Nissan XTerra.
I had the misfortune of being given one of these as a rental car when I had to make a quick drive over the Rockies to Grand Junction and my personal vehicle was in the shop. I had serious doubts that I was going to be able to make it over the summit. I think I was hitting about 12-15 mph with the pedal floored when I finally crested. There were no pelotons around, but I was neatly passed up by a Smart car.
Landrover has to take the cake. There are lots of poorly made cars out there, but few that retail for $80,000. Yeah, I’m sure it’s very nice inside, but when you’re at the very bottom of reliability rankings…
You do know they make (well, made, RIP) more than one model right? That’s like complaining about how those Fords only come in black.
While not really “awful” cars in the manner the OP asks about, I wonder if the VW “cheating diesel” models will live in infamy as examples of corporate malfeasance for years to come…
(In today’s news, Mitsubishi admitted to fudging their fuel economy numbers for some of their Japanese models.)
Modern day bad paint jobs? I see a lot of newer cars where the clear coat has failed, and it has that white, hazy look in spots, usually the hood, roof, and trunk. I don’t remember seeing that on older cars.
And, I see a lot of white Chevy vans that have large sections of the paint peeled off right down to the bare metal.
there was a spike in paint de-lamination across the industry in the '90s. as a movement to reduce/eliminate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) the industry transitioned to water-borne paints. Many hadn’t worked out paint-primer compatibility completely.
That’s true, the old cars were very big but alot of that was empty and wasted space. The engine compartment had lots of open space (granted that made them easier to work on. The trunks were huge but did you really need all that trunk space? As were the interiors but often like today people would be driving alone and didnt need all that space.
I drive one older than that. I have a 1996 Ford Contour. That’s 20 years old. I bought it used in 1997. It’s been reliable, never has given me a bit of trouble. I’ve only replaced things such as tires and batteries, things that normally wear out, a couple of timing belts and the air conditioner compressor. Outside of those, I replaced the stereo a few years ago. I replaced the factory cassette deck with an aftermarket CD player. It only has about 85k miles on it, so I expect it to keep going for years to come.
If you want to talk about modern-day awful cars, you can’t forget the Mitsubishi i-Miev. It’s the cheapest electric car available in the US, and it is the quintessential compliance vehicle. It has a pathetic 60-mile range (in a time when electric cars are expected to have a 200-mile range), and it is so underpowered that taking it onto the freeway is… ill-advised. Also, it’s a rather ugly little subcompact. They don’t advertise it at all, and they literally only sell a few of them per month in this country. It’s screamingly obvious that the Mitsubishi execs said, “OK, State of California, we need to have an alternative-fuel vehicle? OK, fine, here’s our fucking alt-fuel car.”
-My 1977 Ford Courier truck (thirdhand) = spectacular blow-up at 78k
-The 1985 Ford Mustang = everything but the wheels fell off or blew up by 61k
-1988 Nissan Econobox = cheapy everything, but never a glitch in six years
-1994 Suzuki Sidekick = cheapy, but fun and never a glitch (I had two in succession)
-1998 Nissan pickup = same
-2001 Nissan Altima = same
-2003 Jeep Wrangler = no mechanical issues, but an unexciting 4-cyl hamster engine
-2005 Nissan X-terra = gave up the ghost at 92k, as did my brother’s
-2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee = still running strong at 91k, no issues
-2002 BMW 530i = put a lot of money into her after rescue from previous abuse owner; now running like a clock at 151k
Goodness, I’ve had a lot of cars!
We had a lot of shitty Big Boat American cars while growing up. Something was always wrong.