# Montana & South Dakota primaries: Any surprises?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 2, 2008, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556 "2008-06-02T23:57:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2008, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/1 "2008-06-02T23:57:43Z")

</div>

The last two Dem primaries are tomorrow. It doesn’t matter much at this point, given the existing delegate count and the meager populations of Montana and SD, but I rather expect Clinton will sweep those almost-all-white-except-for-Indians states. Any reason to think otherwise?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airblairxxx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Airblairxxx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airblairxxx)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/2 "2008-06-03T00:00:59Z")

</div>

Polling is spotty, to say the least, but the last one I saw had Obama winning Montana.

I’d offer a cite but the boss is lurking.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/3 "2008-06-03T00:03:32Z")

</div>

Most polling has Obama winning both states.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/4 "2008-06-03T00:09:28Z")

</div>

Obama’s [done well](http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Pres/Maps/Jun02.html) in the Great Plains/Western states thus far. Polling shows him doing well in Montana and S. Dakota now.

Really, the only surprise I can imagine is if Clinton were to win them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/5 "2008-06-03T00:16:14Z")

</div>

On CNN this afternoon, one pundit said Montana is solidly for Obama but Clinton has been polling stronger in SD and will probably end up winning.

Montana votes for 16 delegates and S. Dakota votes for 15.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/6 "2008-06-03T00:17:32Z")

</div>

If they’re surprises, then wouldn’t we be unable to predict them by definition?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airblairxxx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Airblairxxx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airblairxxx)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/7 "2008-06-03T00:18:38Z")

</div>

Boss-man went home, so I went cite-hunting.

[This Montana poll](http://missoulian.com/articles/2008/05/25/news/local/news02.txt) has Obama ahead, 52-35. It was taken May 19-21, however.

[Here are two more recent polls by ARG.](http://americanresearchgroup.com/) They have Obama ahead by 4 in Montana but Clinton is ahead by 26 in South Dakota.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 12:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/8 "2008-06-03T00:21:41Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Airblairxxx]  
[Here are two more recent polls by ARG.](http://americanresearchgroup.com/) They have Obama ahead by 4 in Montana but Clinton is ahead by 26 in South Dakota.  
[/QUOTE]  
Well, ARG has a chance to redeem itself. I’ll believe it when I see it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Phlosphr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c68b51/32.png) [@Phlosphr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Phlosphr)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 1:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/9 "2008-06-03T01:25:47Z")

</div>

Everything I’ve heard on NPR today and this evening has Obama winning both.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Key\_Lime\_Guy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/48db29/32.png) [@Key\_Lime\_Guy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Key_Lime_Guy)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 1:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/10 "2008-06-03T01:33:16Z")

</div>

‘Cognate’ results:  
Obama won Wyoming 61-38.  
Obama won NoDak 61-37.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/11 "2008-06-03T20:21:10Z")

</div>

BTW and FWIW, [Jimmy Carter just endorsed Obama.](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080603/ap_on_el_pr/carter_obama_1) (Or, rather, said he **will** endorse him after the polls close today.) And Carter is a superdelegate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/12 "2008-06-03T20:30:16Z")

</div>

[AP says Obama has now clinched the nomination.](http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D912NV3G0&show_article=1)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jas09](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d07c76/32.png) [@Jas09](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jas09)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2008, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/montana-south-dakota-primaries-any-surprises/451556/13 "2008-06-03T20:47:10Z")

</div>

There are, as I see it, two potential surprises today - neither of which will have any impact on the eventual nominee. One would be Clinton winning SD (Montana is out of reach). The other would be Clinton acknowledging Obama as the nominee.
