# More evil: Glinda the Good Witch, or Lex Luthor?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [December 21, 2010, 9:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005 "2010-12-21T21:29:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ranchoth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ranchoth/32/1066_2.png) [@Ranchoth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ranchoth)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 6:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/21 "2010-12-22T18:29:00Z")

</div>

First off, which version of Luthor are we talking about? (Current) comics continuity? Richard Donner movies? DCAU? (Strictly speaking, I could ask the same about Glinda—1939 movie? Books? “Wicked”? One of the other spinoffs or adaptations that no one ever remembers?—but in think the '39 Glinda is the one we’d all be thinking about.)

Second—is there a set definition of “evil” we’re working with, or is it the whole point to decide that ourselves? I mean, like if I send a unprepared young farmgirl off on a mission that could likely lead to her torment and death, because I’m convinced that I’m on the Side of Right™ and some _small_ sacrifices must be made, is that more or less evil than blowing up a skyscraper full of hostages to cover up robbing the company vault, just because I wanted the money?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/22 "2010-12-22T18:32:01Z")

</div>

> [@Ranchoth](#):
>
> First off, which version of Luthor are we talking about? (Current) comics continuity? Richard Donner movies? DCAU? (Strictly speaking, I could ask the same about Glinda—1939 movie? Books? “Wicked”? One of the other spinoffs or adaptations that no one ever remembers?—but in think the '39 Glinda is the one we’d all be thinking about.)
> 
> Second—is there a set definition of “evil” we’re working with, or is it the whole point to decide that ourselves? I mean, like if I send a unprepared young farmgirl off on a mission that could likely lead to her torment and death, because I’m convinced that I’m on the Side of Right™ and some _small_ sacrifices must be made, is that more or less evil than blowing up a skyscraper full of hostages to cover up robbing the company vault, just because I wanted the money?

I need you to rephrase all this in the form of a series of wisecracks.

That said, we are obviously NOT talking about Glinda from the Wiz. She can’t be evil because (a) she’s played by Lena Horne, and (b) she’s played by _Lena Goddamn Horne_. So tread lightly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scuba\_Ben](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/278dde/32.png) [@Scuba\_Ben](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scuba_Ben)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/23 "2010-12-22T18:48:05Z")

</div>

Glinda in the first book is a very minor character. Her role is basically that of MacGuffin: “You came all the way out here to ask me THAT? You could have just sent a Munchkin carrying a letter, and avoided causing all that damage in Porcelain-Land on the way. Oh very well, here’s your answer.”

In the movie, the ending shows her to be one nasty bitch.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_DiFool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_difool/32/19543_2.png) [@John\_DiFool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_DiFool)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/24 "2010-12-22T18:52:22Z")

</div>

> [@Shawn1767](#):
>
> Glinda is a manifestation of Dorothy’s subconscious. She exists only in Dorothy’s dream. Therefore all the inconsistencies are merely because dreams don’t always make sense. If anything, we should be discussing Dorothy’s subconscious and what this means.

You mean, like the WWotW is Dorothy’s Jungian Shadow, the Wizard is her Superego, and Glinda is her Higher Self? With the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Cowardly Lion being further aspects of herself? Oops I’m mixing Freudian and Jungian archetypes, aren’t I?

Of course in the novels, Oz is a real place-which still leaves open the possibility of Dorothy choosing to visit an alternate reality which still reflects her psyche.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/25 "2010-12-22T19:32:06Z")

</div>

> [@John\_DiFool](#):
>
> You mean, like the WWotW is Dorothy’s Jungian Shadow, the Wizard is her Superego, and Glinda is her Higher Self? With the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Cowardly Lion being further aspects of herself? Oops I’m mixing Freudian and Jungian archetypes, aren’t I?
> 
> Of course in the novels, Oz is a real place-which still leaves open the possibility of Dorothy choosing to visit an alternate reality which still reflects her psyche.

Maybe he means [this](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=10682551&postcount=10) post by Captain Amazing – the single greatest CS post ever.

> [@Scuba\_Ben](#):
>
> Glinda in the first book is a very minor character. Her role is basically that of MacGuffin: “You came all the way out here to ask me THAT? You could have just sent a Munchkin carrying a letter, and avoided causing all that damage in Porcelain-Land on the way. Oh very well, here’s your answer.”
> 
> In the movie, the ending shows her to be one nasty bitch.

\*China-\*Land.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 7:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/26 "2010-12-22T19:34:50Z")

</div>

> [@kjckjc](#):
>
> So he was creating a huge metropolis, a city, if you will. And this was to be made up of crystals. Green ones. Emerald even. And so now you are trying to convince us that Lex planned this new Emerald City all on his own? No sir, there was certainly somebody pulling the strings, somebody eeeeeeevil.

Parker F’in Posey. Nuff’ said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 7:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/27 "2010-12-22T19:45:11Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> Parker F’in Posey. Nuff’ said.

I’m going to need you to take that back. Parker Posey is too pretty to be pernicious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Second\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/bbe5ce/32.png) [@The\_Second\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Second_Stone)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2010, 11:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/28 "2010-12-22T23:46:43Z")

</div>

I think you misunderstand that pernicious usually comes in pretty poses. And Dr. Pepper comes in a bottle.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2010, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/29 "2010-12-23T04:02:31Z")

</div>

The “conniving Glinda” scenario is based on the movie’s portrayal of Glinda. In the book Glinda isn’t even involved in most of the action–another Witch pops up at the beginning & gives Dorothy the bad info; Glinda is only met at the end.

So we have to say that Glinda’s reputation has suffered due to lame Hollywood screenwriting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bill\_Door](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/50afbb/32.png) [@Bill\_Door](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bill_Door)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2010, 12:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005/30 "2010-12-23T12:46:06Z")

</div>

> [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](#):
>
> I had the impression that more than one day had passed while Dorothy was unconscious.
> 
> Almira may well have been killed in the tornado.
> 
> On the other hand – I don’t think we see _Toto_ in the coda, and I don’t think he’d have left Dorothy’s side unless … ☹

Well, in all fairness, they had been in the storm celler a long time, and it had been a while since lunch.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/more-evil-glinda-the-good-witch-or-lex-luthor/565005.md?page=1)
