What is “inherent value,” Mach? It’s dependent on your criteria for evaluation. There’s no absolute.
I avoided There’s Something About Mary for a long time, because it looked totally asinine. In many ways, it is totally asinine. Still, after being convinced to give it a chance, I got a good wheeze out of it. No, it doesn’t (for me) hold up to repeated viewing, and there’s close to zero in the way of potential for stimulating after-movie conversation, but if, when considering a movie, you place a high value a belly-laugh, then There’s Something About Mary is a better film than Bergman’s Persona.
You should also try to remember that it’s human nature to equate “rare” and “valuable” to some degree. How would you feel if the hoi polloi had an insatiable attitude for emotionally demandng films like [Love, Liza*? I loved that movie, it was totally cathartic. I value having my emotions affected that powerfully. If 90% of box-office offerings were that emotional, I would value it less.
I’m not so self-centered that, because I got bored with teenage sex-comedies twenty years ago, I think the current generation of teens should have to suffer through the sort of films I enjoy as an adult. Hell, when I was seventeen, I walked out of [url=“http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089366/”]Hail Mary](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0282698/), which I’d gone to see with a group of older friends, and watched O.C. and Stiggs by myself. It was the right decision at the time. I enjoyed Hail Mary on video years later.
It’s one thing to be pissed off if your friends always demand that you bow to their tastes without ever giving anything else a chance, but it’s another thing altogether to say that millions of strangers should stop enjoying the films that they enjoy because you don’t enjoy them.
Word to the wise-- There really is something to be said for big and stupid, once in a while. Don’t dismiss it out of hand. Life in all its rich variety, and all that.