Just in case some other participant or lurker thinks “TLDR” is a proper rebuttal, I offer the following concise description of eliminationism:
It is when one or more popular spokespersons of a specific political faction commonly and consistently use language in their public speech that isolates one ethnic or ideological group as an enemy and attempts to show it as an existential threat that must be eliminated from society.*****
If that’s too long and boring for anyone to respond to, I suggest such a person may not be equipped to discuss these grownup topics
*****For everyone else, please note that neither I nor BrainGlutton (to my knowledge) has ever claimed that eliminationism is dangerous or even very effective in isolation. Most partisan groups have been represented at one time or another by speakers who’ve used eliminationist rhetoric. But it begins to darken the political landscape when the same eliminationist images, concepts and word-for-word phrases are used in concert by many or most of the popular figures representing a specific world view. And that is the ‘eliminationist’ argument about the rhetoric of the right.