# Most poisonous thing

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [February 6, 2011, 5:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411 "2011-02-06T17:20:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cluricaun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/bb73d2/32.png) [@Cluricaun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cluricaun)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2011, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/21 "2011-02-07T13:55:58Z")

</div>

> [@Superhal](#):
>
> Many drugs like cocaine, heroin, angel dust, etc., if they aren’t cut by other products, will kill you in pure form.

This isn’t true at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Khendrask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3e96dc/32.png) [@Khendrask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Khendrask)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2011, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/22 "2011-02-07T15:42:49Z")

</div>

Beryllium Oxide in its dust form has an LD50 to 0.5 to 5 mg/kg.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enigmatic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@enigmatic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enigmatic)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2011, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/23 "2011-02-07T16:18:23Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> This doesn’t make sense. It’s not possible to define an LD50 in the context of an individual. The whole point of the LD50 is to account for variations from one individual to another by defining the dose required to kill 50% of a group of subjects.
> 
> IOW, the LD50 for a given substance is the same regardless of the individual to whom the toxin is being administered.

I knew someone was going to point that out as soon as I read the post back through :p. It does tend to get used rather loosely by lazy scientists to just mean lethal dose when it shouldn’t.

My point was that human LD50 records tend to either be based on a very random patchwork of incidents or an extrapolation from other primates. Given both this and the fact that the exposure environment and access to medical intervention tend to vary by compound, it’s very difficult to make statements about relative toxicity of compounds based on published human LD50 values that are within a order of magnitude or so of each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sailboat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sailboat/32/461_2.png) [@Sailboat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sailboat)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2011, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/24 "2011-02-07T17:05:17Z")

</div>

> [@Superfluous\_Parentheses](#):
>
> Erm, you _can_ eat (or drink - [very famous case here](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko)) plutonium, it’s just that it (AFAIK) has no nutritional value, but that would apply to pretty much any poison or venom.

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> \<Nitpick\>  
> Polonium =/= plutonium.

> [@enigmatic](#):
>
> That was polonium, although there isn’t really anything stopping you eating plutonium though and it is pretty toxic. All of this stuff is going to be many orders of magnitude less toxic than the botulinum though

Just highlighting that plutonium is toxic if you swallow it, although less so than arsenic, for example. It’s also radioactive, carcinogenic if inhaled, can pose a risk of [criticality](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticality_accident), and it’s heavy as hell if you drop it on your foot. Plus you will draw the attention of government agents if you have any. Just stay away from it. It’s bad stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heavyarms553](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/779978/32.png) [@heavyarms553](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/heavyarms553)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/25 "2011-02-09T05:51:32Z")

</div>

Well, the most poisonous native thing growing in north america is probably the fool’s webcap. There have been reports of fatal poisonings from merely tasting it and spitting it out. Destroying angels and deathcaps get a lot of publicity, but you need to eat quite a bit more of them to die.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FuzzyOgre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a587f6/32.png) [@FuzzyOgre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FuzzyOgre)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 9:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/26 "2011-02-09T09:59:00Z")

</div>

Nobody mentioned hydrogen sulfide? Just a whiff will kill you, and its easy enough to accidentally ingest some crude oil that contains a lethal dose.

And if you survive, your lifetime tolerance goes down.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TravisFromOR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/cc9497/32.png) [@TravisFromOR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TravisFromOR)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 10:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/27 "2011-02-09T10:51:37Z")

</div>

> [@Sailboat](#):
>
> Just highlighting that plutonium is toxic if you swallow it, although less so than arsenic, for example. It’s also radioactive, carcinogenic if inhaled, can pose a risk of [criticality](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticality_accident), and it’s heavy as hell if you drop it on your foot. Plus you will draw the attention of government agents if you have any. Just stay away from it. It’s bad stuff.

Just making a post about plutonium on a public message board can draw the attention of jack-booted thugs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sailboat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sailboat/32/461_2.png) [@Sailboat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sailboat)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 12:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/28 "2011-02-09T12:29:28Z")

</div>

There’s also dimethyl mercury. In [a notable case](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Wetterhahn), a small amount killed someone right through her protective equipment. Procedures for handling it were revised as a result of this accident, but, more to the point, most authorities now discourage using it at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enigmatic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@enigmatic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enigmatic)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 12:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/29 "2011-02-09T12:30:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Just making a post about plutonium on a public message board can draw the attention of jack-booted thugs.

Maybe. What exactly do you think they are going to do after they get here and ascertain that the thread isn’t “can someone hook me up with 7kg of plutonium, need answer fast”?

Or do you think everyone gets an annual allowance of times that they are allowed to discuss things that have national security implications in a none security relevant context, before they go on the no flight list? 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sailboat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sailboat/32/461_2.png) [@Sailboat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sailboat)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 12:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/30 "2011-02-09T12:34:30Z")

</div>

> [@FuzzyOgre](#):
>
> Nobody mentioned hydrogen sulfide? Just a whiff will kill you, and its easy enough to accidentally ingest some crude oil that contains a lethal dose.
> 
> And if you survive, your lifetime tolerance goes down.

I don’t see anything suggesting that in [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide#Toxicity):

> [@](#):
>
> Since hydrogen sulfide occurs naturally in the body, the environment and the gut, enzymes exist in the body capable of detoxifying it by oxidation to (harmless) sulfate.[6] Hence, low levels of sulfide may be tolerated indefinitely.

> [@](#):
>
> Exposure to lower concentrations can result in eye irritation, a sore throat and cough, nausea, shortness of breath, and fluid in the lungs. These effects are believed to be due to the fact that hydrogen sulfide combines with alkali present in moist surface tissues to form sodium sulfide, a caustic.[10] These symptoms usually go away in a few weeks.
> 
> Long-term, low-level exposure may result in fatigue, loss of appetite, headaches, irritability, poor memory, and dizziness. Chronic exposure to low level H2S (around 2 ppm) has been implicated in increased miscarriage and reproductive health issues among Russian and Finnish wood pulp workers,[11] but the reports have not (as of circa 1995) been replicated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/31 "2011-02-09T13:22:54Z")

</div>

> [@heavyarms553](#):
>
> Well, the most poisonous native thing growing in north america is probably the fool’s webcap. There have been reports of fatal poisonings from merely tasting it and spitting it out.

Really? Wikipedia mentions claims to this effect, but states that a citation is required. I had previously understood (on the authority of several respected mycologists) that any fungus could be tasted with impunity, as long as it was just a very small piece, spat out and followed by further salivating and spitting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FuzzyOgre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a587f6/32.png) [@FuzzyOgre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FuzzyOgre)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 1:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/32 "2011-02-09T13:31:56Z")

</div>

> [@Sailboat](#):
>
> I don’t see anything suggesting that in [Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide#Toxicity):

Wikipedia never worked on an oil rig. If you do, you are required to take an H2S safety course and get certified.

One of the things they drum into you is that it is heavier than air and can be dissolved in various substances, so walking through the wrong mud puddle can jar it loose. You’ll drop like a stone if its concentrated enough.

Here is a chart. [http://www.safetydirectory.com/hazardous\_substances/hydrogen\_sulfide/fact\_sheet.htm](http://www.safetydirectory.com/hazardous_substances/hydrogen_sulfide/fact_sheet.htm)

Those are pretty rarefied concentrations. The stuff is bad news.

[http://cupe.ca/health-and-safety/Hydrogen\_Sulfide](http://cupe.ca/health-and-safety/Hydrogen_Sulfide)

I was taught that if you do succumb and are revived(or are even just exposed to high levels), you then have a life time lower tolerance, and beyond a certain point you will be barred from entering oil lease sites.

Ah-ha! “Legator and Singleton (1997) reported that permanent central nervous system damage can occur at concentrations common at industrial facilities, asphalt sites, and livestock operations.” from [http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2007/10/Human-Health-Effects-from-Exposure-to-LowLevel-Concentrations-of-Hydrogen-Sulfide.aspx?Page=2](http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2007/10/Human-Health-Effects-from-Exposure-to-LowLevel-Concentrations-of-Hydrogen-Sulfide.aspx?Page=2)

So the means by which it damages can be permanent, so on subsequent exposures, less of the same would be needed to kill you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![heavyarms553](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/779978/32.png) [@heavyarms553](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/heavyarms553)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2011, 2:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/33 "2011-02-09T14:33:30Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Really? Wikipedia mentions claims to this effect, but states that a citation is required. I had previously understood (on the authority of several respected mycologists) that any fungus could be tasted with impunity, as long as it was just a very small piece, spat out and followed by further salivating and spitting.

That is probably correct. However, I’m not so confident that I’d try it out!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enigmatic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@enigmatic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enigmatic)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 9:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/34 "2011-02-10T09:31:19Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Wikipedia never worked on an oil rig. If you do, you are required to take an H2S safety course and get certified.

It’s nasty stuff all right. I’d always been taught that hydrogen sulfide was about on par with hydrogen cyanide.

The issue is that it’s detectable via smell at very low levels (I believe that it’s actually released by old style ammonium sulfide stink bombs), and when increased steadily will become physically intolerable well below the toxic levels, it’s therefore not regarded as dangerous by a lot of people who have encountered it only through chemistry lessons because of that. But your sense of smell is rapidly lost (potentially in seconds) at high concentrations which makes it easy for poisoning to go unnoticed.

> [@](#):
>
> I was taught that if you do succumb and are revived(or are even just exposed to high levels), you then have a life time lower tolerance, and beyond a certain point you will be barred from entering oil lease sites.

I don’t remember anything about the reduced tolerance thing, and a search for “hydrogen sulfide lifetime tolerance” didn’t show anything relevant in the first few hits other than this thread.

Are you sure that the reference wasn’t to shorter term issues? Enzymes do often take a fair amount of time to recover to normal levels after major poisoning events.

There is a paper [here](http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.000545?journalCode=pharmtox) that Google search tells me contains the text “time to apparent recovery, e.g. some blood enzymes returned to normal only. 2 months after the H2S poisoning (101, 102)”  
but I’m not in a position to get the actual paper, so you might want to check it out if you have literature access.

> [@](#):
>
> Ah-ha! “Legator and Singleton (1997) reported that permanent central nervous system damage can occur at concentrations common at industrial facilities, asphalt sites, and livestock operations.” from [http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2007/1...de.aspx?Page=2](http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2007/1...de.aspx?Page=2)

It’s certainly going to have the capacity to cause permanent nervous system damage, anything that screws with mitochondria is going to have the capacity to do that. I wouldn’t _expect_ such damage to increase it’s chance of killing you next time, although I’d be surprised if we understood the nervous system well enough for anyone to be able to give you a definitive no on that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![si\_blakely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d9b06d/32.png) [@si\_blakely](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/si_blakely)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2011, 1:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/35 "2011-02-10T13:26:52Z")

</div>

> [@Cat\_Whisperer](#):
>
> In the category of “most poisonous thing that you can easily grow and might not even know you have in your yard,” I’ll nominate the [Castor Bean.](http://museum.gov.ns.ca/poison/?section=species&id=114) As few as two seeds can kill a child.

The toxin is [Ricin](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricin) and when injected is very toxic - so toxic that the KGB used it successfully as an assassination weapon - check out [Georgi Markov](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgi_Markov).

Si

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FuzzyOgre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a587f6/32.png) [@FuzzyOgre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FuzzyOgre)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2011, 9:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/36 "2011-02-11T09:38:48Z")

</div>

> [@enigmatic](#):
>
> It’s nasty stuff all right. I’d always been taught that hydrogen sulfide was about on par with hydrogen cyanide.
> 
> The issue is that it’s detectable via smell at very low levels (I believe that it’s actually released by old style ammonium sulfide stink bombs), and when increased steadily will become physically intolerable well below the toxic levels, it’s therefore not regarded as dangerous by a lot of people who have encountered it only through chemistry lessons because of that. But your sense of smell is rapidly lost (potentially in seconds) at high concentrations which makes it easy for poisoning to go unnoticed.

Right. In the field it can jump from barely irritable to fatal levels in seconds. I can see that being much less likely in a lab.

> [@](#):
>
> I don’t remember anything about the reduced tolerance thing, and a search for “hydrogen sulfide lifetime tolerance” didn’t show anything relevant in the first few hits other than this thread.
> 
> Are you sure that the reference wasn’t to shorter term issues? Enzymes do often take a fair amount of time to recover to normal levels after major poisoning events.
> 
> There is a paper [here](http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.000545?journalCode=pharmtox) that Google search tells me contains the text “time to apparent recovery, e.g. some blood enzymes returned to normal only. 2 months after the H2S poisoning (101, 102)”  
> but I’m not in a position to get the actual paper, so you might want to check it out if you have literature access.

Possibly. I will see if I can find my old text book. I do remember being told you could be blacklisted from work, and there is an effective blacklist system in place.

For instance, if you were a big enough jerk to people they’ll blacklist you, and if your employer attempts to use you on jobs, they will get blacklisted too.

> [@](#):
>
> It’s certainly going to have the capacity to cause permanent nervous system damage, anything that screws with mitochondria is going to have the capacity to do that. I wouldn’t _expect_ such damage to increase it’s chance of killing you next time, although I’d be surprised if we understood the nervous system well enough for anyone to be able to give you a definitive no on that.

Yeah, they might be erring on the side of caution. For instance, if you have a hearing impairment, they will ask you to get medical proof that you dont have a perforated ear drum as H2S poisoning can bypass PPE(air masks) that way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heyoka13](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Heyoka13](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Heyoka13)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2011, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/37 "2011-02-12T00:27:17Z")

</div>

What would be a lethal dose of anti-matter?

Seems like just enough to blow your head off would do the trick. Anyone know off hand the mass/energy equivalent of a few M-80s?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/73ab20/32.png) [@The\_Tao\_s\_Revenge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tao_s_Revenge)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2011, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/38 "2011-02-12T00:36:53Z")

</div>

> [@Heyoka13](#):
>
> What would be a lethal dose of anti-matter?
> 
> Seems like just enough to blow your head off would do the trick. Anyone know off hand the mass/energy equivalent of a few M-80s?

Even few people eat antimatter than they do lava. See the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HMS\_Irruncible](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hms_irruncible/32/7394_2.png) [@HMS\_Irruncible](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HMS_Irruncible)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2011, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/39 "2011-02-12T01:46:48Z")

</div>

> [@FuzzyOgre](#):
>
> Nobody mentioned hydrogen sulfide? Just a whiff will kill you, and its easy enough to accidentally ingest some crude oil that contains a lethal dose.

Bullshit. If that were true, nobody would survive their first boiled egg fart. Every spring, children would be lying on church lawns dead after easter egg hunts. (Certainly it is lethal at high enough concentrations, but I wouldn’t call that a “whiff”).  
The one interesting thing about HS is that it doesn’t smell at lethal concentrations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2011, 4:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411/40 "2011-02-12T16:29:31Z")

</div>

Cad Jnr was asking for the answer. Is there a consensus on which food (not refined chemical) will kill you the fastest?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/most-poisonous-thing/570411.md?page=3)
