Discretion is the better part of valor.
Rage Against The Machine. It’s their on-the-nose “Wake up Sheeple!” type-lyrics that grate:
I walk the corner to the rubble, that used to be a library
Line up to the mind cemetery now!
Is there room in this thread for a little Sister Christian hatin’?
Surely there’s room in this thread for Talking Heads.
Heard it on the radio today and laughed myself silly. Basically, some girl ran away from home because daddy didn’t talk to her enough, and that’s why she’s a hooker. :smack:
When a hair band or arena rock band who usually sang about groupies, tattoos, or tattooed groupies got political, it always got pretentious.
Poison, “Something to Believe In”
Motley Crue, “Time for Change”
White Lion, “When the Children Cry”
Warrant, “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” (their self-proclaimed effort at serious songwriting)
Tesla “Signs”
Guns N’ Roses “Civil War” (Axl speaking “what’s so civil about war anyway?”)
I think the most complimentary thing I’ve heard about Dream Theater (decades ago now) is that they were really tight. Maybe not Ramones tight, but very tight for prog, I suppose.
I once bought one of their albums, and I sold the CD to a used record store after…one listen? It was lyrically pretty dire. So I figure that’s whom you must beat.
Nah, Talking Heads had a sense of humour and a wicked rhythm section.
Oh man, good call. :smack:
Extra debits against the Warrant song for appropriating a book title for a song that had nothing to do with the book, and against the Tesla song (and it’s a cover!) for inadvertently kicking off the wretched “Unplugged” phenomenon that bedeviled MTV for most of the 90s. :mad:
That’s why I still like Paul and Jacko. Stick to silly love songs.
I can’t believe no one has yet mentioned “MacArthur Park”.
“Someone left the cake out in the rain,
I don’t think that I can take it,
'Cause it took so long to bake it,
And I’ll never have that recipe again!!!”
Wow, that’s really an interesting point, Leftfield. “Turn the Page” and Bon Jovi’s “Wanted Dead or Alive” always struck me as the songs that wreaked of pretense (pretension? pretentiousness? hypretension?) above all others. So I’ll give the championship belt to Bon Jovi.
That’s not pretentious, it’s just ridiculous.
Here’s a question: Dostoevsky dealt with The Big Questions of life, death, God, etc., in most of his works. Does anyone call him “pretentious”?
Beethoven’s work was often long, bombastic and complicated. Not everyone loves it, but does anyone call Beethoven “pretentious”? No.
It’s fine to deal with big issues and to write complicated music, PROVIDED you’ve got genuine insights, genuine interesting ideas, and interesting music.
If you DON’T have the intellect to say something new, relevant or meaningful about the big issues, then you WILL sound like a pompous, pretentious twit when you try to write songs about them.
And pop music (three-minute songs with fairly strictly prescribed instrumentation and structure) is really not the best vehicle for trying to address the Big Questions…unless you are a once-in-a-generation talent.
While I think the song doesn’t score a zero on the pretentiousness scale, I don’t think using “one” is pretentious. The lyric is describing putting distance between yourself and others, so I think it’s appropriate to use “one” since it is also distancing. Clever, even.
It’s a bittersweet symphony - that’s Life. You try to make ends meet, try to love somebody, then you die.
It’s a tough question. Sure, Dostoevsky and Beethoven rock, but there are plenty of Russian novels and classical symphonies that could be considered pretentious.
Look at jazz pianist Art Tatum - dude could outplay anyone, anytime. He put lead fills on top of his lead fills and had 3-5 ideas going at once. But while a lot of folks don’t like his rococo approach, or think he’s exhausting or overly busy, few call him pretentious. Why? I have no fuckin’ clue, but I assume that most folks can hear that Art Tatum the purest of talents and not some overwrought navel-gazer.
Up until now, I always thought that it was about someone who was fed dreams of being a rock star, but failed and so had to go to work literally at a machine (i.e. factory,) in addition to the metaphorical sense of machine. This is enhanced by the shift whistle/mass of people at the song’s end.
The song captures the essence of a meaningless work/life, and the accompanying music perfectly captures the feeling as well (the harsh if not industrial keyboard effects representing the machine playing off of the soft acoustic guitar sounding like broken dreams). But knowing that it was meant to be about a successful rock star, I’d have to agree that it’s pretentious.
“Have a Cigar”, on the other hand, is one of the few songs about how much being a rock star sucks that I don’t dislike. Since anyone can find that they’re being asked to ride the gravy train by opportunistic cynics, not only musical artists.
Fittingly, ironically, those guys got sued because that song was just basically the singer singing over an orchestral arrangement of “The Last Time” by the Stones. 
I think purely instrumental musicians get a lot more leeway, because in the absence of lyrics it’s harder to ascribe intent, and intent is central to whether the work of art in question is pretentious or not. If Tatum had named one of his albums “A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius” (for example), I think we’d be calling him quite pretentious right now. 
With this as the primary criteria, I nominate U2. 