# Movie/TV actors as mental images of historical or literary figures

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [July 31, 2014, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464 "2014-07-31T03:00:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 3:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/41 "2014-08-01T15:12:01Z")

</div>

Marc Anthony will always look like Marlon Brando in my mind, even though I’ve never watched anything from the movie except the funeral oration: [Mark Antony's Speech - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X9C55TkUP8).

Brando is so much like Anthony was supposed to be that it’s frightening. I really can imagine someone with Brando’s gifts taking over half the Roman empire and leading them over a cliff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/42 "2014-08-01T15:35:30Z")

</div>

Ben Kingsley is always Gandhi.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Don\_t\_Panic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/don_t_panic/32/398_2.png) [@Don\_t\_Panic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Don_t_Panic)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/43 "2014-08-01T15:55:32Z")

</div>

> [@Slithy\_Tove](#):
>
> For years during the 20th C, Julius Caesar was either Claude Rains or Rex Harrison; both playing him as George Bernard Shaw’s beau ideal of the bemused realist. With the monstrous dictators of the era running wild, Caesar could look benign in comparison (so long as we didn’t examine the historical record too closely).
> 
> Then after the corporate raiders of the 80’s, portrayals of Ceasar changed to the typical sort of megalomanical asshole out of Fortune magazine.

BTW, speaking of Caesar.

These days, I tend to think of Caesar as Lance Armstrong. Well, if you replace the bicycle, the doping scandals and the appearance on Oprah with the conquest of Gaul, the end of the Republic and making himself dictator for life. He’s a paradoxical and divisive figure. A man who is dominating and somewhat larger than life, but also a ruthless bastard who think the rules don’t apply to him. Intensely charismatic, someone you want to root for, but also always the alpha male, and an egomaniac who is burning with ambition. When he shakes your hand, you feel special, but if you get on his bad side, he will mess you up. He can’t just be the greatest man in the Republic, he must be greater than the Republic. He can’t just do well in the Tour the France, he has to utterly dominate it. He’ll cheat, lie and use any underhanded tactic to get what he wants, and he’ll walk over any number of bodies to get to the top, whether they are those of enemies or of former allies.

But he’s also a man with an uncanny ability to grip the hearts and minds of the people, and who is revered as a popular hero by many even after his downfall. Sure, he made himself dictator, brought down the Republic, used EPO, blood doped and then covered it all up. And sure, he’s such a spinmeister with his Oprah interview and his writings from the Gallic Wars. But he did so many great things! He fought for the glory of Rome and the U.S. Postal Service! He reformed the calendar and started a foundation to fight cancer! He was always on the side of the people against the Senate and the oligarchs, and I’ll still wear his yellow ribbon, even if he is a gigantic asshole.

He’s also someone who, at the end, seemed to think that he had become too great to bring down, and when he did fall, it took him by surprise. “You can’t murder Caesar! You can’t strip Lance of his titles! Don’t you all love me?” His ego just got too big for him to see the reality of the situation.

And even now, somewhere in our hearts we still like him more than the weasily stab-happy senators and the petty and nosy anti-doping journalists who brought him down.

(Well, anyway, you know what I mean.)

Yeah, I think Lance would make a pretty good Caesar.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fuzzy\_wuzzy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a8b319/32.png) [@Fuzzy\_wuzzy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fuzzy_wuzzy)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 4:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/44 "2014-08-01T16:03:23Z")

</div>

Jason Robards will always be FDR to me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 4:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/45 "2014-08-01T16:29:49Z")

</div>

> [@Zeldar](#):
>
> [QUOTE=me]  
> I sure am glad you’re capable of understanding that and taking a grand view, there.

Why, thank you. Every now and then I have a moment of clarity. It usually fades when the sun comes up.  
[/QUOTE]

I honestly can’t tell which of us is whooshing the other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/46 "2014-08-01T16:33:26Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](#):
>
> I honestly can’t tell which of us is whooshing the other.

Then you win. Congrats!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/47 "2014-08-01T16:57:16Z")

</div>

I agree with what’s already been posted about Lincoln’s thin, reedy, Kentucky-accented voice, as noted by many of his contemporaries.

> [@burpo\_the\_wonder\_mutt](#):
>
> I hate to admit this, but I spent my first four decades within shouting distance of Gettysburg, PA; my Dad dragged us there dozens of times, but I couldn’t follow any of it. Put Jeff Daniels, Martin Sheen and Sam Elliott in a 4-hour film and I am hooked through the gills. Says more about me than the battle, though.

I thought Robert Duvall in _Gods & Generals_ made a better Robert E. Lee than Sheen, but _Gettysburg_ is by far the better movie. And Jeff Daniels nailed Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain’s quiet courage and everyman strength of character - shoulda gotten an Oscar for _Gettysburg_, I thought.

Edward Woodward will always be Harry “Breaker” Morant, although there wasn’t a very strong personal resemblance. Love that movie:

[http://static.awm.gov.au/images/collection/items/ACCNUM\_SCREEN/A05311.JPG](http://static.awm.gov.au/images/collection/items/ACCNUM_SCREEN/A05311.JPG)  
[http://resources0.news.com.au/images/2010/11/12/1225952/394240-breaker-morant.jpg](http://resources0.news.com.au/images/2010/11/12/1225952/394240-breaker-morant.jpg)

> [@Zeldar](#):
>
> …And I have forgotten exactly which show David Morse was a perfect George Washington for. HBO maybe?..

Yes, in HBO’s _John Adams_. He and Paul Giamatti were both very good in their respective roles: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgCQDZdlMdc](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgCQDZdlMdc)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/48 "2014-08-01T17:17:50Z")

</div>

> [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](#):
>
> \<\< cliopped \>\>  
> Edward Woodward will always be Harry “Breaker” Morant, although there wasn’t a very strong personal resemblance.  
> \<\< and here \>\>

Not to argue, but for me the role that defines Woodward is in the original [The Wicker Man (1973)](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070917/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_59) which was blasphemed in a remake with Nicolas Cage not too long ago. But Breaker was indeed a great role for him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![burpo\_the\_wonder\_mutt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/burpo_the_wonder_mutt/32/365_2.png) [@burpo\_the\_wonder\_mutt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/burpo_the_wonder_mutt)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 5:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/49 "2014-08-01T17:21:19Z")

</div>

(2 posts up) Haven’t done G&G yet, but I could see that. If Gettysburg is (to you) a 4 star film, what would you rate G&G?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/7cd45c/32.png) [@Elendil\_s\_Heir](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elendil_s_Heir)\
**Post date:** [August 1, 2014, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464/50 "2014-08-01T19:42:35Z")

</div>

If we’re talking about a five-star scale, _Gettysburg_ would be a three-star film. _G&G_ would be a one, if that. It shows two Confederate triumphs (Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville) and no Union wins, has not one but two slaves say they would rather be free but are content to remain enslaved, and has a noticeably-plumper and -older Daniels playing what is supposedly a younger Chamberlain. It is far more unbalanced and pro-Confederate than _Gettysburg_ IMHO.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movie-tv-actors-as-mental-images-of-historical-or-literary-figures/694464.md?page=2)
