# Movies that truly stood the test of time **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Created:** [April 17, 2005, 8:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748 "2005-04-17T08:45:58Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Dunderman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ecb155/32.png) [@Dunderman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dunderman)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 8:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/1 "2005-04-17T08:45:58Z")
The art of filmmaking is now over a century old, and it has made amazing leaps in that time. Therefore, most movies that were loved and revered in their time look pretty dated and amateurish today, and not only in the effects department. I can watch old classics and appreciate them for what they did for filmmaking, but if I try to simply watch them like I would any movie, I’m usually disappointed. With some exceptions. _The Cabinet of Dr Caligari_ is still scary and evocative today, after 85 years. _Casablanca_ is still almost a perfect movie, despite having given birth to so many clichés that a modern-day watcher should tire of it in fifteen minutes, feeling that he’d seen it all before. _The Wizard of Oz_ still works just fine. These movies I don’t have to give leeway because of their age. What are your examples? ---
**Author:** ![SPOOFE](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c5a1d2/32.png) [@SPOOFE](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SPOOFE)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 9:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/2 "2005-04-17T09:01:48Z")
A lot more recent than your examples, but I’d nominate _Star Wars_. I think its grandeur stands especially proud in light of the prequels, which don’t come anywhere near its quality. Is it deep? Hell no. Is it a lot of fun? Hell yes. A little less nerdliness, but I’d also nominate _Citizen Kane_. I don’t bestow it with deity-levels of worship, but it certainly stands unique for its technical achievements, as well as Welles’ blending of movies and theatre. Slightly less well-known, I’d give the nod to _Compulsions_, another Orson Welles movie (well, sort of… he doesn’t star, but he definitely plays the most interesting character). It doesn’t have the typically stupid-happy ending of the day, it doesn’t take easy ways out, and it deals with some pretty dark and sick themes that would still be dealt with trepidation today. And good goddamn, the closing argument that Welles’ lawyer character makes at the end is a true cinematic experience to enjoy. ---
**Author:** ![Sarah\_Woodruff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/df788c/32.png) [@Sarah\_Woodruff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sarah_Woodruff)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 9:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/3 "2005-04-17T09:27:45Z")
[The original Nosferatu](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013442/)- made in 1922, it is a silent film, but the hideous vampire and all the flickering shadows scare the bejesus out of me 83 years after it was made. ---
**Author:** ![uglybeech](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/82dd89/32.png) [@uglybeech](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/uglybeech)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 9:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/4 "2005-04-17T09:40:44Z")
I second Nosferatu in the very old movie category. Movies I consider timeless even though they’re considerably younger: The Manchurian Candidate Dr. Strangelove (actually most of Kubrik’s seem peculiarly modern in tone. As if they could have been made yesterday). From Here to Eternity And here’s a prediction: Silence of the Lambs I think will stand the test of time. ---
**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 10:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/5 "2005-04-17T10:50:32Z")
I made a list of what I thought were the 50 most important Hollywood films, and I believe they all will stand the test of time. I would post the list here, but it is quite long and would overwhelm the thread. I had posted it before, but the hamsters have lost it. ---
**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 1:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/6 "2005-04-17T13:54:13Z")
2001: A Space Odyssey. Everything but the title is eternal. Empire Strikes Back. It’s so much smoother than the original and just feels like it’ll last. Citizen Kane Pitch Black. Yes, I said it. I had a thread on here at one point stating that this movie is the next great cult hit. I am an absolute supporter of this movie and hope it stands the test of time well(yes, I loved the sequel as well). ---
**Author:** ![Alias](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a88e4f/32.png) [@Alias](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alias)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/7 "2005-04-17T14:17:57Z")
I’ll have to second The Manchurian Candidate (the original one). That movie is practically perfect. ---
**Author:** ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/8 "2005-04-17T15:55:00Z")
D.W. Griffith’s \*\*Broken Blossoms \*\*(1919, silent). Obviously no one would confuse this film for something modern – which is definitely in its favor. Lillian Gish is utterly radiant, and more innocently beautiful than in any other film of hers. This film is worth seeing if only to see Gish play this role. Yes, there’s some really awful racial stereotyping (the main character is supposed to be Chinese, and sensibilities were very different back then). ---
**Author:** ![ElectricZ](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/58f4c7/32.png) [@ElectricZ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElectricZ)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/9 "2005-04-17T17:14:16Z")
_The Third Man._ I used to think that older movies couldn’t effectively portray human nature but TTM does a great job, as well as being an effective mystery. Then there’s the all-zither soundtrack that’s timeless simply because it DOES NOT STOP throughout the whole movie. 🙂 EZ ---
**Author:** ![Tangent](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tangent/32/3098_2.png) [@Tangent](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tangent)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 5:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/10 "2005-04-17T17:29:24Z")
**Raiders of the Lost Ark** is as much fun to watch today as it was 25 years ago. The action scenes hold up well, despite having been copied by dozens of other movies. Harrison Ford and Karen Allen are terrific in their roles. The score is inspiring. This is one film I would bet the bank on being a classic 50 years from now. > [@Mahaloth](#): > > Pitch Black. Yes, I said it. I had a thread on here at one point stating that this movie is the next great cult hit. I am an absolute supporter of this movie and hope it stands the test of time well(yes, I loved the sequel as well). I’m with you on **Pitch Black** , but I couldn’t stand the sequel. ---
**Author:** ![Walloon](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/fbc32d/32.png) [@Walloon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Walloon)\ **Post date:** [April 17, 2005, 11:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/11 "2005-04-17T23:38:10Z")
The amazing, avant-garde [Man With a Movie Camera](http://www.imagesjournal.com/issue05/reviews/vertov.htm#top) (1929). This is always my number one choice when I want to surprise people with how advanced silent-era moviemaking could be in the right hands. ---
**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 12:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/12 "2005-04-18T00:23:00Z")
Those old Melies shorts, with these crude silly special effects - there’s one where he uses black velvet bags and editing tricks and such to “take his head off” and put it on a musical staff , as I recall, and a lot of stuff like that. It’s still so fresh and playful and creative! (Beats the hell out of those Lumiere trains coming into stations, man). Everything he did just speaks of the great potential of a new medium. _Lawrence of Arabia_ is still as moving and effective now as it was when it was released, and there’s still nothing like that great desert with that tiny little man coming out of it. _Blade Runner_ really dosen’t seem dated at all, although you know that sort of future has fallen a bit out of fashion. I think it will survive after _Star Wars_ is mostly forgotten. ---
**Author:** ![Lobsang](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobsang/32/4067_2.png) [@Lobsang](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobsang)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 12:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/13 "2005-04-18T00:31:16Z")
I did a ctrl-f search for the word ‘escape’ so it looks like no-one has mentioned ‘The Great Escape’ which I can’t believe. If someone has mentioned it I aplopogise. I am someone who is prejudiced against old movies (pre-1980) and I LOVED the great escape. Same goes for a Clockwork Orange. ---
**Author:** ![Tentacle\_Monster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ba9def/32.png) [@Tentacle\_Monster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tentacle_Monster)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/14 "2005-04-18T00:39:27Z")
It’s only 25 years old, but I think Airplane! will always be funny. ---
**Author:** ![Baker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/bb73d2/32.png) [@Baker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baker)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/15 "2005-04-18T01:08:20Z")
> [@panache45](#): > > D.W. Griffith’s \*\*Broken Blossoms \*\*(1919, silent). Obviously no one would confuse this film for something modern – which is definitely in its favor. Lillian Gish is utterly radiant, and more innocently beautiful than in any other film of hers. This film is worth seeing if only to see Gish play this role. Yes, there’s some really awful racial stereotyping (the main character is supposed to be Chinese, and sensibilities were very different back then). I totally agree that this is a superior movie. That scene where Gish’s character is hiding in the closet, as her father breaks down the door in order to get at her to beat her, is horrendous even now. She’s a young girl, totally trapped, circling around and around in this tiny space like an animal without hope. And the printed epilogue, about how “You may not beat your child, but how often do you hurt them with unkind words?” will never be dated. ---
**Author:** ![stegon66](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ee59a6/32.png) [@stegon66](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stegon66)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/16 "2005-04-18T01:30:12Z")
Someone already mentioned my favorite movie, _The Third Man_. Add to the list Stanley Kubrick’s _Paths of Glory_. ---
**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/17 "2005-04-18T02:09:19Z")
_To Kill a Mockingbird_ A lot of the storytelling techniques are dated, but if you don’t still get choked up and simultaneously uplifted by it, you have no heart. ---
**Author:** ![RikWriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/49beb7/32.png) [@RikWriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RikWriter)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/18 "2005-04-18T02:12:23Z")
Jaws. ---
**Author:** ![RealityChuck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/realitychuck/32/195_2.png) [@RealityChuck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RealityChuck)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 2:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/19 "2005-04-18T02:39:04Z")
Most Chaplin and Keaton films still hold up, most notably **City Lights** and **The General**. Others: **Duck Soup Horse Feathers Bringing Up Baby Footlight Parade 42nd Street The Wind The 39 Steps Singin’ in the Rain North by Northwest She Wore a Yellow Ribbon M. Hulot’s Holiday** ---
**Author:** ![ZipperJJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zipperjj/32/211_2.png) [@ZipperJJ](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZipperJJ)\ **Post date:** [April 18, 2005, 5:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748/20 "2005-04-18T05:46:34Z")
I’ve watched “It’s a Wonderful Life” every Christmas for 25 years and it never feels dated to me. Might be that holiday movies are in general pretty timeless, but even when I introduce the film to friends who have never seen it, they immediately appreciate it. [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-that-truly-stood-the-test-of-time/299748.md?page=2)