# Movies without moral redemption: Any? Possible?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [December 18, 2006, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660 "2006-12-18T17:59:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2006, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660/101 "2006-12-19T13:46:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=The New and Improved Superman]  
There’s one that I thought would be fairly obvious that’s been missed -

[Pink Flamingos](http://imdb.com/title/tt0069089/)! Utterly without redemption. In fact, the protagonists / antagonists of this film _compete_ for the title of most ruthlessly craven, irredeemable filthy person in the world.  
[/QUOTE]

But that makes for a happy ending. Everybody wins in a competition like that! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2006, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660/102 "2006-12-19T14:00:22Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=JohnBckWLD]  
Funny Games[.](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=116204)  
[/QUOTE]

Excellent. Not a bit of redemption, but I would argue that this movie is the sort of movie lissiner believes von Trier makes … its ending is really ABOUT the audience’s expectations, rather than being a natural outgrowth in the story.

The filmmaker makes this quite clear by having what seems to be a happy ending occur toward the end of the film, then ‘rewinding the film’ and having the ending come out dark, as if saying, “No happy ending for you, silly audience.” Very European. Very dumb.

They either are doing or have done an American remake of Funny Games, it will be interesting to see what happens to the ending.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2006, 3:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660/103 "2006-12-19T15:01:30Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Sublight]  
Hasn’t anyone seen _Swimming With Sharks_? It’s basically _The Devil Wears Prada_ (based on what I’ve seen of the previews for DWP) ten years earlier in the film industry with male leads (Kevin Spacey and Frank Whaley).

Producer Spacey dumps on his assistant Whaley the entire movie, until finally Whaley decides to get even. No moral redemption at all.  
[/QUOTE]

I see your point, but in the OP I did make an exception for revenge movies, which are sort of redemption-in-reverse. And if I didn’t make an exception for dark comedies, I should have.

Among **lissener** ’s many odd points, he makes one good one – we can narrow the field so much that it’s self-referencing. Is it possible to have a redemptive Disney Hollywood light comedy that’s not a redemptive Disney Hollywood light comedy? The answer seems to be that even in those narrow contstraints, yes, sometimes it’s possible. Not as a matter of course, but on occasion.

_Quick Change_ certainly seems to fall into the light comedy category, but is it redemptive at all?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SkipMagic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skipmagic/32/20706_2.png) [@SkipMagic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SkipMagic)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2006, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660/104 "2006-12-19T17:46:55Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> > [@lissener](#):
> >
> > Lars Von Trier’s Dancer in the Dark addresses this pretty forcefully. The theme of this movie is that if you’re going to be that kind of audience, that insists on neat happy endings where everything turns out “right”–if you’re going to be so emotionally immature that you turn over the maintenance of your emotional life to Stephen Spielberg–then you deserve what you get.
> 
> [I was saying what Von Trier was accusing his audience of; that was not “me” talking. I was saying that Von Trier was accusing his audience of emotional immaturity; _I_ was not accusing anyone. I was discussing the theme of a movie, not calling spoke immature.]

> [@spoke-](#):
>
> I find arrogance annoying. I’m funny that way.

Okay, I think we’re done with this hijack. **spoke-** , **lissener** has clarified his original comment, so that should clear up (hopefully) some of the problems you had with his post; if it doesn’t however, then move it to the Pit or just move on (my vote).

Please keep in mind that Cafe Society is not meant for discussion about other posters; it’s meant to talk about the arts. When the discussion veers off into how to interpet a poster’s attitude, it’s gone outside the purposes of Cafe Society and should either stop or move to the Pit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2006, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660/105 "2006-12-19T19:39:02Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Evil Captor]  
Dude. Movies are entertainment. It’s real life that sucks. If I thought making movies that sucked as much as real life would somehow make real life suck less, I’d be with you all the way. Von Trier would be a moviemaking god. But the guy clearly hates his characters and puts them through hell for the fun of it, and then expects us to join him on his little sadism rides.  
[/QUOTE]  
First off, your last sentence describes Stephen King to a T: I wouldn’t change a word of it, and will probably quote it without attributiont the next time a discussion on King comes up. Second, movies certainly \*can \*be entertainment, strictly and solely. Nothing but brain candy and distraction. They can, however, be so much more. So to complain when they’re MORE, rather than just limiting yourself to watching the ones you like, strikes me as odd. How is a diversity of artistic intention a bad thing? Would the world really be a better place if ALL movies were NOTHING but brain candy and distraction?

Third, you don’t learn only from positive example. The danger in that is that you become accustomed to assuming that whatever you’re watching is a positive example, and you lose a sense of critical judgment. A good movie, fyask me, is one that is morally ambiguous, and leaves the audience in the position of having to judge for themselves. When it’s morally black and white, it’s easy to fall into the trap of assuming the filmmaker’s morals as your own, rather than judging for yourself. This is my major problem with a filmmaker like Spielberg: he tells you what to feel every step of the way, so skillfully that it’s almost impossible to resist, and leaves you an entirely morally passive person. Von Trier was accusing those members of the audience who willfully give themselves over to that.

[QUOTE=Evil Captor]  
Saying we somehow have a responsibility to like the trash von Trier churns out is like saying we have a responsibility to like cotton candy. We don’t, dude.  
[/QUOTE]  
Huh. Well then it’s a good thing no one said anything like that, ain’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2006, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660/106 "2006-12-19T19:42:29Z")

</div>

For the record: I love a movie that’s nothing but brain candy and distraction, if it’s well done. \*Con Air, Double Team, Romy and Michele, Tank Girl, Bring It On, Run Lola Run, \*almost any Fred and Ginger flick, most of Hitchcock, _Arsenic and Old Lace_–come on, the list is endless.

But to condemn a movie for being more than that is ridiculous.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/movies-without-moral-redemption-any-possible/384660.md?page=5)
