Movies you've seen recently (Part 1)

Shadows (1959, John Cassavettes).

It’s considered the forerunner of American independent cinema and has won many awards, and I thought it looked and sounded amateurish. It should be a lot more interesting: The story’s about race relations and struggling jazz musicians during the Beat Generation years in New York City; some of the music is by Charles Mingus; and there’s even an interesting story about an earlier version (with a lot more Mingus) being lost for decades and resurfacing in 2003.

The actors weren’t bad, but the sound, lighting, photography and other aspects seemed pretty crappy to me. In a number of scenes, characters having a conversation were filmed separately (not on screen together), as often happens, but it doesn’t look or sound like they’re in the same place at the same time or even responding to each other (unnatural flow of dialogue). Hasn’t aged well, and it was born pretty damn ugly, IMO. I think it’s appreciated more for its significance than its content, but I’d love to hear otherwise from fans of the film.

**Showboat[p/B] – the 1951 version. Gorgeous Technicolor photography. Apparently they toned things down for this version, and I should really see the 1936 version if I want the definitive one (I’ve watcvhed bits of it on YouTube. Hard to believe that version was directed by James Whale, who did Frankenstein and The Old Dark House. Kinda like Robert Wise directing West Side Story and The Sound of Music) . I’m a big fan of musicals, and this was apparently a groundbreaking one for its integration of deeper stories and adult themes with the music, but I couldn’t help thinking that musical taste have changed a helluva lot. Aside from “Old Man River”, I really couldn’t get into the songs at all. I’m surprised that the subject of miscegenation played such an important role. Ironically, they couldn’t have an actual black or partly black woman play the role because Southern states wouldn’t run the film if an actual black lady kissed a white man. Times have definitely changed.

The film is also apparently largely responsible for the idea that a Mississippi showboat was basically a standard steamboat. It wasn’t – the boiler would take up the place where the audience would be if they tried to put this on in a standard steamboat. The 1936 film portrayed it correctly – the showboat was actually basically a big box on a boat base that had to propulsive power of its own; it was driven by a “tow boat” that, despite the name, pushed it on the river.
Shin Godzilla – The most recent Japanese version of Godzilla (at least, the most recent non-animated one) resets the clock and tells the story of Godzilla as if no prior version existed. It’s interesting in that

a.) Godzilla sort of “evolves” through the film, starting as an animal that can’t walk upright to become something like the Godzilla we are familiar with.
b.) As far as I can tell, it’s the first fully CGI Japanese Godzilla (an earlier film had a CGI scene of Godzilla swimming underwater, but the rest of the film, was classic guy-in-a-suit. This film looks like it’s exclusively CGI. There have been three films made wholly or partly with US participation that had completely CGI Godzilla, but this looks like the first all-Japanese CGI Godzilla movie.
c.) They try to depict what would actually happen if the Japanese government had to deal with the sudden appearance of a kaiju in Tokyo Bay. So, especially at the beginning, we get lots of shots of people on telephones, people arguing about whose responsibility things are, government operatives staying late at their desks. It’s [iu]Godzilla vs. The Bureaucrats*. And it’s Japanese bureaucracy, so you know it’s extra-bureaucratic. They want to reassure the public, so they lie about the problem being solved, just before Godzilla invades. One functionary is convinced that the threat is a real biological threat, but he’s told that he’s too junior to buck the system. And so on. A very different take on the response to a Monster Invasion. And the bureaucrats ultimately do prevail.

I’ve been watching other Godzilla films I missed recently – Godzilla 2000, Godzilla Tokyo SOS, Godzilla vs. Destroyah. They’re interesting in their own ways, but Shin Godzilla* is really different.
*It apparently means something like “Godzilla II” or “Godzilla Again”, but they wanted to translate it as “Godzilla: Resurgence” before deciding to simply go with the Japanese title.
Robinson Crusoe on Mars – I stumbled across a used copy of the Criterion edition (the only version on DVD I’m aware of), and had to pick it up. Despite many things that today look cringe-worthy, it’s definitely several cuts above the typical science fiction film of the period – or even today. This is, as far as I know, the first SF film to use the idea of a “self destruct” on a space ship, and the only one to use the idea properly and to good effect.

My latest five:

Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure
I’d wanted to see this for the longest time - don’t even really know why - and finally got around to it. Silly, quirky and funny, most of the time.

Scandalous: The True Story of the National Enquirer
Pretty interesting documentary about the venerable supermarket tabloid, and its evolution over the years from horse-racing periodical to blood-and-guts rag to celebrity gossip source to purveyor of political agitprop. Quite a tale.

Just Mercy
Based-on-a-true-story courtroom drama about a courageous young lawyer and the wrongly-accused man he tries to get off Alabama’s death row. Kind of predictable, but Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Foxx are both excellent in the lead roles.

Ex Machina
Rewatched this beautifully-shot, unsettling, potent sf drama about the threats and opportunities posed by AI. Very good stuff.

The Death of Stalin
Darkly-comic satire about the frantic Politburo maneuvering, politicking and backstabbing that followed the Soviet strongman snuffing it at long last. Steve Buscemi is great as Khrushchev, despite looking nothing like him, and Jason Isaacs, looking nothing like Lucius Malfoy, is also very good as the blustering, arrogant Marshal Georgi Zhukov. Not great history, but a helluva ride.

I know you are, but what am I? :smiley:

Yesterday - about a man who realizes The Beatles have been erased from history in everyone’s mind but his, so he decides to perform their songs as his own. Directed by Danny Boyle. I liked it, but it felt a little bit lacking in some way. I just never felt much tension, even during the climactic scenes. It is a good concept, but it needed more energy.

Definitely agreed. A good movie that, in different hands, might have been great.

Exit, a Korean action/comedy disaster movie where the protagonists parkour across city rooftops to stay ahead of a rising, deadly toxic fog. The initial premise was contrived, but once the story got going it was actually a very fun film! 8/10.

Got in a few nominees over the past 3 weeks or so before the big night:

Marriage Story
Life Overtakes Me
The Two Popes
I Lost My Body
Klaus
Parasite
Hair Love

And one more: Troop Zero

Watched “Dr. Sleep”, which was a pretty good adaptation of the King novel. Also watched “The Last Jedi”, which was just tiresome.

I watched Laurel and Hardy’s Sons of the Desert, which I’d never seen. In fact, it’s been ages since I’ve seen any Laurel and Hardy movies. I was curious about Sons of the Desert because it is consistently listed as one of their best films. They even named the Laurel and Hardy fan club after it (although, to be fair, how many other L&H titles lend themselves to becoming fan club names? This one comes with ready-made costumes, oaths, and songs, too.)

But I have to admit to feeling let down. Maybe I was simply building up my expectations too much, but I was ready for some excellent, involved comedy – like the tour de force that was Buster Keaton’s The General. What I saw seemed like pretty standard run-of-the-mill effort, not something to rank among the very best.

Or am I missing something? Anybody want to defend this film from me giving it a downcheck?

That’s pretty typical of what most people think of those two movies. The General is rated 8.1 and Sons of the Desert is rated 7.6 on the IMDb, making The General the 194th highest rated film and Sons of the Desert well outside of the top 250 rated films. The General is ranked as number 34 in the 2012 version of Sight and Sound’s 100 Greatest Films of All Time, while Sons of the Desert doesn’t make it into list of the 100 greatest. Laurel and Hardy may have a pretty intense group of fans, but outside of them Sons of the Desert doesn’t rate that well.

Shhhhhhhhh! I’m trying to use the phone!

There’s a lotta things about me you don’t know anything about, Dung and burpo. Things you wouldn’t understand. Things you couldn’t understand. Things you shouldn’t understand.

Saw “Once Upon a Time . . . in Hollywood” last night. We both thought it was pretty meh. How Pitt got an Oscar for that is a mystery to me.

The Lobster WTF!?!? If I cared enough to bother I’d look up what that movie was really supposed to be about.

The Laundromat fantastic. A wonderful cast and a delightful production of what would normally be a boring subject.

Oh, and I might add that there was a huge problem (to me) in the Tarentino movie: they kept showing people shuttling around the country in 747s. The time frame for this film is 1967, at the latest, and the 747 didn’t fly commercially until 1970.

Actually, we can pinpoint the timeframe pretty precisely: August 8, 1969 – the date of the Manson Family murders.

True, but this is also a universe where Hitler died in a theater fire and the Tate-LaBianca murders at the very least went down very differently from ours.

Um…yeah…that’s a bit of a stretch. It’s one thing to posit: What if the Manson family went to the house next door? vs. What if the Manson family, Sharon Tate, everything they did and movies they made etc all occurred two years prior? Also: went to the house next door?

Yeah, my bad. The “Family” came under Manson’s influence in 1967, but the murders were two years later. Still, the planes were a glaring error.