According to the story, in 2008 Inman is 29 and his friend/accomplice is 28. Also according to the story, in 1994 Inman was 16 and his friend was 13 or younger? Maybe it’s just time for me to go to bed, but, what the hey? I guess Inman must have been 15 plus a lot at the time of the crime, and the friend 14 minus a fraction.
If you insist on the classical definition, “hero” wouldn’t be a word much used at all anymore, divine parentage being so hard to come by. “One who shows great courage,” though, is a definition that survives in modern dictionaries, and it’s hard to think of a more heroically courageous act than confessing to a capital crime in Texas in order to fulfill a personally-felt ethical obligation to justice, when the alternative is to continue to exist, fairly comfortably, in the knowledge that Texas justice is so sooty already that an additional smudge won’t be noticed, and in fact that its record is so black when it comes to capital crimes that it’s not really a smudge at all.
The fact that this act led Inman’s friends today to call him a hero does not detract from the ground occupied by those who call him a murderer: these truths exist independently of each other and do not clash. Whitmanlike, we are all large and we all contain multitudes. Statesman, liar, philanthropist, rogue; Thief, soldier, poet, glutton; Genius, racist, samaritan, philanderer; Doting father, embezzler, safe driver, alcoholic. Me on my best day, me on a good day, me when I’m mad, me at my worst.
The man is being condemned for what he has done. Let him also be praised for what he also has done, so that our children can learn to appreciate the difference.
