Quote:
Originally posted by BobLibDem:
I was taught that the bomb was dropped on Japan because they would never surrender. In truth, they were trying to negotiate a surrender via the Soviets.
Holy shit, I didn’t know that!"
True, but the Russians weren’t interested. They only declared war on Japan after we had them defeated. They were just interested in gobbling up as much territory and influence as they could. Some people speculate that a major reason for dropping the atom bomb was to impress the Russians that we were not to be trifled with. This was especially important after Roosevelt and Churchill gave away the farm in Europe.
Also, according to the History Channel, the Japanese deliberately dragged their feet in their reply after the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, replying in an ambiguous manner. (I used to know the actual word that they used; maybe someone else can provide it.) They did this in an attempt to try and negotiate a more favorable peace treaty. It was as a result of this delaying tactic that the decision was made to drop the second bomb on Nagasaki.
Also reported on the History Channel was an unsuccessful attempt by some of the younger military officers to kidnap the emperor and to prevent the broadcast of the pre-recorded tape of the emperor telling the Japanese people that they should surrender without any further resistance. Only the bravery of a few people refusing under threat of death to disclose the location of the tapes and at the radio station prevented this from happening. There was a movie produced about this and it appeared to be very accurate in the historical details.
Often overlooked is the fact that more people were killed in the firebombing of Tokoyo than were killed by the atom bombs. It is just that the atom bomb was so powerful a weapon that the emperor could “save face” by “thinking the unthinkable” and surrender in view of such a weapon.
Again, according to the History Channel, the fanaticism of the kamikaze pilots convinced our military leaders that unless the atom bomb was used, the japanese population as a whole would fight unto the death and many more lives would be lost on both sides. I think if you compare the lives of eastern europeans and the Japanese since WWII, it is obvious which group was treated better.
Also, our leaders suspected, correctly as it turned out, that the American POW’s would be killed by the Japanese if and when Japan was invaded. I know a man whose brother was in a Japanese POW camp when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The Japanese soldiers murdered all 2500 POW’s at that camp the same day.
A Japanese man who was just a boy at the end of the war said that he was concerned that his generation was the last one that would remember how well they were treated by the US soldiers. He said that the Japanese soldiers told them that the American soldiers were cannibals and would eat them. He said that they found out just the opposite; the American soldiers were nice to them and gave them candy and gum.
A woman (from Okinawa?) told of how the Japanese soldiers would arrange them seated in a circle on the ground and would then drop a hand grenade into the circle. She cried as she reported that the only reason that she was alive was that her grenade did not go off.
The Japanese soldiers also either forced or induced Okinawans to jump off of the cliffs into the sea (many times holding their children) instead of being captured by the Americans. The History Channel did show a black and white film someone had taken of a woman jumping from a high cliff, surely to her death.
I can only imagine the rage US veterans must have felt when they heard of the exhibit in the Smithsonian that apparently put much of the blame for the war on the US and that dropping of the atom bomb was not necessary.