# Natalie Portman's nipples **URL:** \ **Category:** Cafe Society\ **Created:** [November 19, 2003, 9:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066 "2003-11-19T09:16:36Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 4
**Author:** ![Moo\_the\_Magic\_Cow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ebca7d/32.png) [@Moo\_the\_Magic\_Cow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Moo_the_Magic_Cow)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 6:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/61 "2003-11-20T06:16:35Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by Michael Ellis \* > \*\*Chalk me up as another one who’s quite uninterested in Natalie Portman. \*\* I don’t get it either. I mean, yeah, she’s attractive, but not moreso than any other good-looking girl her age. ---
**Author:** ![Yookeroo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yookeroo/32/323_2.png) [@Yookeroo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Yookeroo)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 6:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/62 "2003-11-20T06:34:01Z")
Natalie’s seriously yummy. So are her nipples. She was bigtime jailbait in **Beuatiful Girls**. Good movie. ---
**Author:** ![zoltar7](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b38774/32.png) [@zoltar7](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zoltar7)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 9:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/63 "2003-11-20T09:12:08Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by bughunter \* > But Yahoo is great for nipplage. If you see a photo of a female celeb on Yahoo’s Most Viewed Stories news page, and she’s not associated with one of the top stores (and she’s not Britney, Pamela, or Jennifer), look for nipples. \*\* [Natalie Nipples from Yahoo!](http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/031115/ids_photos_en/r3048724578.jpg&e=20&ncid=1756) ---
**Author:** ![Munch](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/munch/32/5281_2.png) [@Munch](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Munch)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 2:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/64 "2003-11-20T14:00:13Z")
> [@](#): > > Can I be the first to say that she’s wearing a flesh coloured bra? Nope. She has a very bright tan line, but that’s no bra. ---
**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/65 "2003-11-20T14:16:56Z")
Oh now I get it, Portman’s advertising for her upcoming movie… _Cold Mountain_ ---
**Author:** ![Grey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/b782af/32.png) [@Grey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grey)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/66 "2003-11-20T15:02:20Z")
These aren’t the nipples we’re looking for. Move along now. ---
**Author:** ![HDS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/bb73d2/32.png) [@HDS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HDS)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/67 "2003-11-20T15:04:42Z")
> [@](#): > > you can see Hugo Weaving’s nipples. Yay! Yum! While watching the second Matrix I kept thinking, “Look at all those Hugos! Enough for everyone!” 😃 ---
**Author:** ![FordPrefect](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/e99b99/32.png) [@FordPrefect](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FordPrefect)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/68 "2003-11-20T15:05:10Z")
She is cute. I like, and agree with, **Munch** ’s Royalty analogy. Nipples are nice. ---
**Author:** ![bughunter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/aeb1de/32.png) [@bughunter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bughunter)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 7:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/69 "2003-11-20T19:28:45Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by Mr2001 \* > \*\*Wake me up when you have some new pics of Heidi Klum. \*\* [Will These Do?](http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?g=events/en/111403victoriasecret&i=index&e=1&tmpl=sl) ---
**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 8:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/70 "2003-11-20T20:43:07Z")
Eh, I prefer Bernadette Peters’ nipples under a see-through dress. Yes, I have such a pic and no, I don’t know where I downloaded it from. ---
**Author:** ![TeaElle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8491ac/32.png) [@TeaElle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TeaElle)\ **Post date:** [November 20, 2003, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/71 "2003-11-20T22:08:59Z")
Bernadette Peters?! Really? The fascination with a specimen as decidedly irritating as Portman almost offends my feminine sensibilities, but I do understand that “ooh, ooh, nipples” thing that seems to happen with you men. I’m amused by it, but I do get it. But please do not be mistaken – this does not happen by accident. Fabric that sheer is sheer everywhere, no matter the light. Such public nipplage may not be the ultimate goal, but it surely ain’t no accident, especially from Hollywood types who know full well that they’re going to appear under bright stage lights and in glaring photo flashes which are going to make every feature of their dresses fully visible, including the sheerness. That leads me to the conclusion that young Miss A, er, um, _Portman_ was happy to hype her goodies for a little bit of attention. And if that ain’t a turnoff, what is? ---
**Author:** ![ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chockfullofheadygoodness/32/511_2.png) [@ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ChockFullOfHeadyGoodness)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/72 "2003-11-21T01:18:54Z")
> [@](#): > > _Originally posted by wolf\_meister_ > if you’d like to see some other unclothed femmes, the site is \ > It has lots of pop-ups [Beavis and Butthead] heh heh heh heh heh [/B&B] ---
**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 2:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/73 "2003-11-21T02:13:28Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by TeaElle \* > **Bernadette Peters?! Really?** Yep. I’d say the picture is from around the same time as **The Jerk**. ---
**Author:** ![photopat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e95f7d/32.png) [@photopat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/photopat)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 2:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/74 "2003-11-21T02:23:32Z")
Bernadette Peters…sigh. She’s still pretty hot. ---
**Author:** ![Manduck](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/manduck/32/256_2.png) [@Manduck](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Manduck)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/75 "2003-11-21T03:59:40Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by TeaElle \* > \*\*That leads me to the conclusion that young Miss A, er, um, _Portman_ was happy to hype her goodies for a little bit of attention. And if that ain’t a turnoff, what is? \*\* Well that ain’t a turnoff, I can promise you, so I’ll have to think of something that is. How about if she farted - that might be a turnoff. ---
**Author:** ![Gorsnak](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gorsnak/32/7587_2.png) [@Gorsnak](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gorsnak)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 4:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/76 "2003-11-21T04:14:18Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by Equipoise \* > \*\*I’ve heard that often those dresses don’t look so transparent in the store or at fittings, but when the woman gets up on stage in front of those multiple SuperDooperTrouper bright lights, bam, it’s transparent as all getout. That happened to Jewel one time too. \*\* Cite? ---
**Author:** ![Already\_in\_Use](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a9adbd/32.png) [@Already\_in\_Use](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Already_in_Use)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/77 "2003-11-21T04:56:54Z")
OK, so now we know that Natalie Portman isn’t a witch. That will help me sleep at night. ---
**Author:** ![Standup\_Karmic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ac91a4/32.png) [@Standup\_Karmic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Standup_Karmic)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 6:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/78 "2003-11-21T06:10:03Z")
> [@](#): > > \*Originally posted by Petter \* > \*\*Nipples protruding through two layers of fabric, woo … hoo. \*\* I never thought of it that way! That means there’s only a mere two layers of fabric between her nipples and mine (ignoring my shirt, the thousands of miles between us, a husky bodyguard and one measly little restraining order). [insert drool-y Homer sound here] But of course, like other’s who’ve clicked on the thread title, checked out the pic, read through all of the responses, and bothered to take the time to contribute, I have no interest whatsoever in Nipply Portman and her Natalies. Really. Don’t look at me like that, I was touching myself **before** I looked at that pic. ---
**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 6:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/79 "2003-11-21T06:28:15Z")
Miss Portman certainly isn’t bad looking (though she doesn’t compare to Princess Leia by a long shot), and I’ll never complain about nipples. But does anyone else think that that’s otherwise a rather unflattering shot of her? ---
**Author:** ![Standup\_Karmic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ac91a4/32.png) [@Standup\_Karmic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Standup_Karmic)\ **Post date:** [November 21, 2003, 6:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066/80 "2003-11-21T06:30:21Z")
It shows something other than her nipples? Musta missed that part. [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066.md?page=3) [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/natalie-portmans-nipples/214066.md?page=5)