Nations With Official (or Unofficial) Theocratic Tendencies

Absolutely. Early Presidents. How many recent ones would you class with the deists?

Australia doesn’t have a President… does it? In any case their current Prime Minister is Anglican I think. But I have used NZ as an example before; our current PM perhaps has a religion… but has said he doesn’t believe in life after death, and our previous PM was agnostic or an atheist. The point being that – outside of a few small fringe parties – religion or lack of religion is not a deciding factor in getting elected here. Is the same true of US politics?

If a US presidential candidate said: “if you’re asking me if I’m religious it depends how you define religion*”, and stated that he did not believe in life after death, would it have a positive, negative, or no effect on his election chances?

(*quote from current NZ PM John Key).

I wasn’t bashing the US. I was asking, given the exact wording of the OP’s question, whether the OP was wishing to explicitly exclude the US from consideration.

What hijack? The OP asked about (my emphasis): Nations With Official (or Unofficial) Theocratic Tendencies.

Tendencies. Not actual theocracy. If you think there are aspects of Dominionism in the US aren’t you arguing in support of the US having theocratic tendencies?